<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Apr 17 2008, 05:50 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kdub @ Apr 17 2008, 06:45 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Apr 17 2008, 02:28 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I can't decide how to vote.
Should I vote how he did relative to my expectations or should I vote on an absolute scale of NBA players?</div>
I had that problem as well. I'd think, however, that when talking about rookies, people tend to talk about their production in terms of what is expected out of them.
That's why I voted B. He was considered raw, had possible behavior issues, and was drafted in the teens where many bigs become busts. However he's started 39 (?) games, provides some of the season's best highlights and averaged respectable numbers, while (when motivated) playing quite well.
I didn't give him an A because, well, he's still raw (still looks somewhat jerky out there, little offensive game), and is reported to have behavior issues (Dave D: "millionaire athelete, 10 cent head").
</div>
Well, I'm also anticipating the likely discussion of well the majority voted player X as a B, but voted player Y as a C. Player Y had better stats than player X so something is wrong here.
</div>
Yeah, comparisons to other Nets wouldn't work. Other rookies however...