1st Debate! Trump vs Clinton

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
IS THAT ONE OF THOSE FAKE DAN RATHER DOCUMENTS DOE?
 
jlprk said:
Circular reasoning.

The reason that the rush to war took 1.5 years of daily demands from Bush to rush us into war was...almost everyone was against going to war. Get it?

Just because he had to give us the bum's rush for so long due to our resistance, does not mean that he did not give us the bum's rush. Get it?
Click to expand...

Except everyone was for it.

72%, in fact.

22% against it. That's not resistance.

If only the facts agreed with your version of history, I might agree with you.

http://www.pewresearch.org/2008/03/19/public-attitudes-toward-the-war-in-iraq-20032008/

770-1.gif
 
Except that we've been through this and I showed you other polls from the biggest polling companies that show that even at the outset, the majority of Americans opposed the war. I don't have time now to dig up that post from a few years ago.
 
No you didn't because there were no such polls.
 
jlprk said:
Except that we've been through this and I showed you other polls from the biggest polling companies that show that even at the outset, the majority of Americans opposed the war. I don't have time now to dig up that post from a few years ago.
Click to expand...

umm, I don't remember this. I do remember finding myself, differing with most other people again.
 
barfo said:
So far the score on daily newspaper endorsements is Clinton 11, Johnson 5, Trump 0. Pretty amazing.

barfo
Click to expand...

Now 18 to 6 to -1 (the USA Today endorsed 'Not Trump')

barfo
 
Trump has shot himself in the foot so many times in the last week, he needs hip replacement surgery.
 
barfo said:
How many tweets is he going to send Nov 9 saying that if you disregard the vote totals, he won bigly?

barfo
Click to expand...

Russia hacked Newsweek as soon as they published the Trump Cuba article. They're going to hack multiple states election offices. We're not going to know who wins until next year.
 
oldfisherman said:
Trump has shot himself in the foot so many times in the last week, he needs hip replacement surgery.
Click to expand...
He's tanking the election hard....he sold his brand to the masses and the last thing he wants now is a real job
 
Denny Crane said:
No you didn't because there were no such polls.
Click to expand...

Wellll, I spent 2 minutes looking.

http://media.theharrispoll.com/docu...inds-Big-Differences-Among-Americ-2003-03.pdf

I could find many more, but you'd just ignore them as you've done in the past. By the way, even if you were right that the majority was in favor of the war from its first day, that would still be irrelevant to whether it was a pressured rush to war. It took Bush 1 1/2 years of daily whining lies to coerce America into war, not some leisurely unrushed walk in the park as you claim. It was a pushy rush to war.
 
jlprk said:
Wellll, I spent 2 minutes looking.

http://media.theharrispoll.com/docu...inds-Big-Differences-Among-Americ-2003-03.pdf

I could find many more, but you'd just ignore them as you've done in the past. By the way, even if you were right that the majority was in favor of the war from its first day, that would still be irrelevant to whether it was a pressured rush to war. It took Bush 1 1/2 years of daily whining lies to coerce America into war, not some leisurely unrushed walk in the park as you claim. It was a pushy rush to war.
Click to expand...


"Furthermore, a majority of Americans (58%) are at least somewhat confident that President Bush “will make the right decisions regarding the use or non-use of the U.S. military to attack Iraq.” Most people in Great Britain (69%) and Canada (63%) have little or no confidence that he will do so. "

Sad how much smarter the Brits and Canadians are.

barfo
 
barfo said:
Sad how much smarter the Brits and Canadians are.
Click to expand...

The British media are more current, in depth, and multisided than the more controlled American media. The British are just better at verbal skills--writing, reading, and talking.

At no time was the majority of Americans in favor of the Iraq War, even at the peak of war fever on the first day, after 1 1/2 years of a media rush to war pressuring the majority to be silent. Revisionist history will teach students differently, of course.
 
jlprk said:
Wellll, I spent 2 minutes looking.

http://media.theharrispoll.com/docu...inds-Big-Differences-Among-Americ-2003-03.pdf

I could find many more, but you'd just ignore them as you've done in the past. By the way, even if you were right that the majority was in favor of the war from its first day, that would still be irrelevant to whether it was a pressured rush to war. It took Bush 1 1/2 years of daily whining lies to coerce America into war, not some leisurely unrushed walk in the park as you claim. It was a pushy rush to war.
Click to expand...

barfo said:
"Furthermore, a majority of Americans (58%) are at least somewhat confident that President Bush “will make the right decisions regarding the use or non-use of the U.S. military to attack Iraq.” Most people in Great Britain (69%) and Canada (63%) have little or no confidence that he will do so. "

Sad how much smarter the Brits and Canadians are.

barfo
Click to expand...

upload_2016-10-1_16-14-21.png

33% + 40% is how much?

D'oh!
 


"It's my right to wear this, sir"

Duh.

Wearing a Trump hat to a freaking BLM rally - what's the worst that can happen?

This moron knew exactly what he was doing. Attention whoring for his FB Live feed.
 
Fez Hammersticks said:


"It's my right to wear this, sir"

Duh.

Wearing a Trump hat to a freaking BLM rally - what's the worst that can happen?

This moron knew exactly what he was doing. Attention whoring for his FB Live feed.
Click to expand...


The dude should have taken a knee, that would have confused everyone.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Click to expand...


Hmm, I question if this is drawing to win an invitation to the debate is legal.

Most states have strict regulations against requiring a financial commitment, such as a purchase, to win a drawing. He clearly states that to be entered, you must make a contribution. That violates most state regulations. I am not sure if there is an exemption for political drawings?

In addition, he states his father will pick the winner. I am not sure that fits the legal description of how a winner may be chosen in most states. Also, the odds of winning need to be announced in most states.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top