$200 and a story gets you marijuana authorization at Hempfest in Seattle

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BrianFromWA

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Editor in Chief
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
26,096
Likes
9,073
Points
113
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015969811_marijuana21m.html

The ads, by a clinic called 4Evergreen Group, offered authorization to use medical marijuana for one year for $150 if the patient had medical records; $200 with no medical records.

I was one of the first in line Friday, no medical records in hand but curious about how the process worked. After watching a short instructional video and meeting with a naturopath for 11 minutes, I joined the uncounted but growing number of Washingtonians able to legally posses 1-½ pounds of cannabis and 15 plants.

Throughout the 13-year history of the state medical-marijuana law, the issue of how patients get authorized has been overshadowed by battles between advocates and law enforcement over rules for possession.

But the Legislature's 2010 expansion in the type of medical professionals able to authorize marijuana, and the emergence of specialty authorization clinics, helped stoke a boom in the medical-cannabis industry. That pushes the issue of authorizations to more prominence, none more visible than 4Evergreen's Hempfest tent.

I was authorized for recurring lower-back pain, a condition the naturopath found to be covered under the law's definition "a terminal or debilitating medical condition" because it caused "intractable pain." It flares up weekly, but I haven't missed work for it in years.

The authorization process appears to largely comply with state law, even if I might not be the type of patient voters had in mind when they passed the law in 1998.

"The intent of the law is to treat people with terrible, serious, even life-threatening conditions that may be helped with medical marijuana," said Donn Moyer, a spokesman for the Department of Health. "Ask yourself, is that what's happening out there?"

4Evergreen, with locations on Seattle's Aurora Avenue North, and in Tacoma, advertises itself as "the premiere patient network." Its Hempfest tent is well-known among advocates.

A staff member advertised the "no medical records" offer outside the tent while, inside, patients filed into bathtub-size exam rooms separated by curtains. Patients were asked to fill out a medical inventory of problems and to watch a video describing fine points of the medical-marijuana law and advising patients to not drive while high.

I waited nearly two hours to see Dr. Carolyn Lee Bearss. . "Let's focus on your back," Bearss said.

State law limits medical-marijuana use to patients with such debilitating conditions as AIDS-related wasting syndrome and multiple sclerosis. Intractable pain is defined as not easily managed, relieved or cured by other treatments.

I did not embellish, although, with no medical records on hand, nothing would have prevented it. I describe a four-year problem, treated by physical therapy, prescription and over-the-counter pain remedies, with weekly flare-ups ranging from slight to severe. Most of my male friends and family have similar complaints.

As required by the state law, Bearss did a physical exam, asking me to stretch until it hurt. She talked about other alternatives, including acupuncture, and advised me to see my primary doctor about other medical issues.

Then, after 11 minutes, she signed the one-year authorization on tamper-proof paper, and I handed over my credit card.

Do people care that this is happening? Survey seems to say "no."

The Hempfest tent doesn't bother Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, medical marijuana's prime champion in Olympia, because it may be convenient for legitimate patients unsure how to get authorized.

But she noted that the law requires "intractable pain," not "chronic pain," and wonders how a doctor can so quickly diagnose a long-term condition without medical records.

"I think that may be a rather loose evaluation," said Kohl-Welles, D-Seattle. "I think that does not meet the spirit of the law, if not the technicality of the law."...Although Department of Health's (DOH) professional boards can discipline doctors and others for violating the medical-marijuana law, none has been cited, according to DOH records.
 
For $200 and a sad story I'll buy you a drink.
 
American patients can (and do) pester their doctors about "pain" they're experiencing and receive all sorts of medication. Land of the free

Personally my drugs of choice are a strong cappuccino in the morning and a home brew IPA in the evening. I alternate between Naproxen Sodium and IB if I'm in pain accompanied by lots of H2O.

I'm not at all troubled by others finding something else that works for them... I know several very successful professionals who have wonderful families and seemingly are achieving the American dream that smoke pot regularly. If history is any indication of our nature, there will always be some who abuse drugs and hurt themselves, but often those types will seek out what they seek to abuse regardless of the laws. If anything, having some drugs taboo seems like it makes them more attractive.

STOMP
 
I wonder about all this.

On the one hand I think there is some validity to some of the studies that conclude there is some pain relief from pot. On the other hand, the current system is nothing more than a sham for anyone who wants to stay high all the time. Granted, I only know two people who have a legal pot card, but neither had a single thing wrong with them but have parlayed that into a SS disability and now they are high virtually all hours of the day they're awake and those of us who pay taxes support them 100%. BTW, one is an ex brother in law who became an alcoholic and the other is a lady I used to work with who uses a made up illness, fibromyalgia. But, it's pretty much an on going evolution of our cradle to grave welfare society.
 
good, pot is safer than all the other pain drugs, and safer than all the other recreational drugs, and MUCH safer than alcohol

its a joke that it is illegal, and remains so only to fill privatized prisons, and boost booze sales
 
I have no problem with this. The more legal pot, the less illegal pot, and the less illegal pot, the fewer crimes and the fewer people we "have to" incarcerate.

barfo
 
I live down the street from hempfest, and ... it's so effing annoying. A bunch of unwashed people who smell to high heaven and have pit bulls at their sides...

GTFO of my neighborhood, you dirty hippies.

Ed O.
 
I have no problem with this. The more legal pot, the less illegal pot, and the less illegal pot, the fewer crimes and the fewer people we "have to" incarcerate.

barfo
You don't "have to" incarcerate. You could execute them, put them in work camps, fine them, take away civic rights, etc.

Let me know when I can choose to ignore certain laws without consequence. I think you'll find my ideas are somewhat different than "I wanna get high, dude"
 
You don't "have to" incarcerate. You could execute them, put them in work camps, fine them, take away civic rights, etc.

That's why I put "have to" in quotes. Choose to would be more accurate.

Let me know when I can choose to ignore certain laws without consequence. I think you'll find my ideas are somewhat different than "I wanna get high, dude"

Ok, I'll bite! Which laws are you eager to break?

barfo
 
I live down the street from hempfest, and ... it's so effing annoying. A bunch of unwashed people who smell to high heaven and have pit bulls at their sides...

GTFO of my neighborhood, you dirty hippies.

Ed O.

The world barfo loves.
 
I have no problem with this. The more legal pot, the less illegal pot, and the less illegal pot, the fewer crimes and the fewer people we "have to" incarcerate.

barfo


The only problem I have with this scenario is that it also means turning out more potheads I have to support with my taxes. Adding another class of deadbeats to the public dime. Libs never have a problem with this as it expands their voting base. But I guess this is what our country has come to signify. More booze, more drugs, more deadbeat welfare types, elimination of the middle class and we'll just make the rich pay for it all. That's as progressive as it gets.
 
Last edited:
I have no problem with this. The more legal pot, the less illegal pot, and the less illegal pot, the fewer crimes and the fewer people we "have to" incarcerate.

barfo

Unlimited unemployment benefits for life means you don't have to work.
The rich paying for everyone's healthcare means you get your medical marijuana for free.

Sounds like a jobs program!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top