OT 2018-2019 Rip City Two FANTASY FOOTBALL

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
TorturedBlazerFan said:
Hey after a couple weeks with a guy whos been injury prone in the past I wanted to move on and I like ajayi. Why wouldnt I use that guy to go get another guy I like.
Click to expand...
You could get much better value for that. That's horrid lol.
 
trailblazer18 said:
Vetoing trades because you think it is lopsided is ridiculous and a fantasy foul for sure - it's there to stop cheating. I'll definitely be upset if it doesn't go through.
Click to expand...
You just say this because you're on the other end man. Its that, and it's also there to protect against obviously lopsided stuff. I'm sure you can redo the deal with more, but you know you're fleecing him.
 
trailblazer18 said:
Commish vetoing at as well...this league is rubbish.

https://www.sbnation.com/fantasy/20...reality-stop-vetoing-trades-stop-being-a-jerk

If you are vetoing trades, why aren't you wearing an "I am an enormous doodyhead" sign?
Click to expand...
You wouldn't be making such a big deal about it if it wasn't you who's fleecing him. Even said you could probably get the trade done by giving up a little more and still win the trade while having it go through. You know it's extremely lopsided as is. And it's not like you worked hard on creating this trade, and now that works gone to waste. It's a 1 for 1 swap. I understand the frustration, but you should understand where were coming from as well.
 
BonesJones said:
You wouldn't be making such a big deal about it if it wasn't you who's fleecing him. Even said you could probably get the trade done by giving up a little more and still win the trade while having it go through. You know it's extremely lopsided as is. And it's not like you worked hard on creating this trade, and now that works gone to waste. It's a 1 for 1 swap. I understand the frustration, but you should understand where were coming from as well.
Click to expand...
I definitely think I'm getting the better end of the deal. That is one of the main reasons I agreed to the trade, but @TorturedBlazerFan knew what he was getting into and has his reasons for doing the trade. None of you offered a trade for Fournette. I don't know how many outside fantasy articles I need to find that agree that you don't veto trades unless it was cheating.
 
trailblazer18 said:
I definitely think I'm getting the better end of the deal. That is one of the main reasons I agreed to the trade, but @TorturedBlazerFan knew what he was getting into and has his reasons for doing the trade. None of you offered a trade for Fournette. I don't know how many outside fantasy articles I need to find that agree that you don't veto trades unless it was cheating.
Click to expand...
Us not offering for Fournette have nothing to do with it. Fantasy articles have nothing to do with it. I'm sure I can find articles that say something else as well. He said he didn't want to deal with Fournette's injury. So he trades him for an injured player... makes no sense. Since it'd be impossible for us to prove collusion, we have to veto anything that's extremely imbalanced to protect the league from it, regardless of if we think there's collusion or not. Know what I mean?
 
BonesJones said:
Us not offering for Fournette have nothing to do with it. Fantasy articles have nothing to do with it. I'm sure I can find articles that say something else as well. He said he didn't want to deal with Fournette's injury. So he trades him for an injured player... makes no sense. Since it'd be impossible for us to prove collusion, we have to veto anything that's extremely imbalanced to protect the league from it, regardless of if we think there's collusion or not. Know what I mean?
Click to expand...
It wasnt just the current injury its that I went back and looked and Fournette is almost always questionable with some sort of injury and misses games here and there and its always a ya never know game.
 
W
BonesJones said:
Us not offering for Fournette have nothing to do with it. Fantasy articles have nothing to do with it. I'm sure I can find articles that say something else as well. He said he didn't want to deal with Fournette's injury. So he trades him for an injured player... makes no sense. Since it'd be impossible for us to prove collusion, we have to veto anything that's extremely imbalanced to protect the league from it, regardless of if we think there's collusion or not. Know what I mean?
Click to expand...
Whatever, it's bogus.
 
TorturedBlazerFan said:
It wasnt just the current injury its that I went back and looked and Fournette is almost always questionable with some sort of injury and misses games here and there and its always a ya never know game.
Click to expand...
Ajayi has similar issues though. Fournette is a top 8 RB when healthy, and Ajayi isn't even top 20. It makes 0 sense. It's like trading CJ for Jeremy Lamb.
 
Well whatever the rules are the rules. the rules are if four people veto the trade doesnt happen. So I guess it is what it is.
 
TorturedBlazerFan said:
Well whatever the rules are the rules. the rules are if four people veto the trade doesnt happen. So I guess it is what it is.
Click to expand...
Honestly, if you get a little more value back I don't think people would have a problem with it.

Should definitely use this thread to announce who's on the trade block and what not.
 
TorturedBlazerFan said:
I didnt know there was an unwritten rule that I had to announce guys I wanted to trade.

Whatever veto it or don’t.
Click to expand...

No rule, just common sense if you want to get the best offers for that player.

You need depth at RB. I'd give you 3 RB's for Fournette, one of them (AP) has put up more points than Ajayi.
 
Last edited:
TorturedBlazerFan said:
I didnt know there was an unwritten rule that I had to announce guys I wanted to trade.

Whatever veto it or don’t.
Click to expand...
You don't have to, its just the fact that you showed no diligence when trading your 2nd round pick, then readily traded him for a 7th round pick with the same injury problems 2 weeks into the season.

You may not agree and I dont want to ruffle any feathers, but I hope you can understand why that's confusing to us.
 
Also, I'm jot.saying this from a standpoint where I want Fournette. I'm not even gonna go after him.
 
BonesJones said:
You don't have to, its just the fact that you showed no diligence when trading your 2nd round pick, then readily traded him for a 7th round pick with the same injury problems 2 weeks into the season.

You may not agree and I dont want to ruffle any feathers, but I hope you can understand why that's confusing to us.
Click to expand...
I understand it. Im not confused. I am really, really tired today had a long night (young kids do that once in a while) and I will try to remember that when I post so I dont make a donkey of mysef. I just feel like at this point you guys can veto it if you want, or let it go through its up to the voters. It doesnt do a whole lot of good to just keep talking about it and telling me how wrong you guys think I am for making the offer I did. I get it, I awknowledged that on paper it looks like a bad deal, none of us know how the rest of the seasons gonna go.
 
So if the trade ends up being vetoed will I know immediate or do I have to wait til the system says its going to process?
 
"I'll trade you Ryan Grant for Josh Gordon"

*Drops Ryan Grant*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BonesJones
Forum Game 2020-2021 RipCityTwo Fantasy Football
2 3 4
Replies
106
Views
11K
trailblazer18
trailblazer18
BonesJones
OT 2019-2020 RipCityTwo FANTASY FOOTBALL
27 28 29
Replies
843
Views
48K
PtldPlatypus
PtldPlatypus
BonesJones
OT Looking to fill out our Fantasy Football League for this year
8 9 10
Replies
274
Views
24K
Sedatedfork
Sedatedfork
hoopsjock
Forum Game Rip City Two 2019 Mock Off Season
8 9 10
Replies
270
Views
16K
TorturedBlazerFan
TorturedBlazerFan
KeepOnRollin
Forum Game Over/Under All-Star Edition!
Replies
18
Views
7K
KeepOnRollin
KeepOnRollin

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top