#24 Anfernee Simons (2 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Bringing on Rod Strickland for a second stint killed that team in my memory...
Rod was drunk then...his alcoholism battled him his whole life..he got in trouble with it in Russia when he coached there...to get in trouble for drinking in Russia you have to be wasted...his first stint here was a thing of beauty though
 
Er, did Detlef's last year (2000-2001) coincide with Cheeks' first year (2001-2002) in some way I'm not remembering? Detlef played 2 years in Portland at the peak of Trader Bob's volatile experiment. Was it only Detlef's retirement tour last year that he didn't have to go to practice? That timeline isn't making much sense.

Neither Dunleavy nor Cheeks had could give roster input. Bob sucked for both coaches.
 
Watching that UAA Highlights video from earlier in this thread again. Simons definitely has a ton of CJ in his game. There were plenty of times in that video where he could have taken it to the hoop and dunked it. Instead he pulls back and then quickly swishes a classic CJ pull up. That shows a maturity to his game because most 18 year olds would be dunking it all day against those kids.

Edit: And I would not be surprised to see him grow to a solid 6'5" shooting guard in the next couple of years.
 
Watching that UAA Highlights video from earlier in this thread again. Simons definitely has a ton of CJ in his game. There were plenty of times in that video where he could have taken it to the hoop and dunked it. Instead he pulls back and then quickly swishes a classic CJ pull up. That shows a maturity to his game because most 18 year olds would be dunking it all day against those kids.

Edit: And I would not be surprised to see him grow to a solid 6'5" shooting guard in the next couple of years.
Imagine if he grew another 2 inches. At 6'6, he could maybe play SF, and he'd be a star
 
fullsizerender_0.jpg
 
Lotto talent that's a few years away. I like this pick.

However, I was disappointed that Neil didn't swing big and try to trade up for Doncic.
 
“He had another very high-level player on his team that actually shared the backcourt with him, Eric Ayala, who’s going to Maryland next year,” Nash told The Post. “Sometimes when you’re a kid that’s that good, you want the ball in your hands the whole time, but he was unselfish enough to defer to Eric when Eric was playing well, and when he needed to take over he took over.”

Simons wasn’t playing against European pros or Division I players last year, but Ayala’s presence alongside him indicates the level of opponent he often faced. And the rigorous travel schedule, along with twice-a-day practices, means Simons might be no less prepared for pro life than his college counterparts.

https://nypost.com/2018/06/21/why-anfernee-simons-is-the-biggest-mystery-of-this-nba-draft/
 
I'm trying to go back and re-evaluate Simons as a prospect based on the little information available. I found a decent writeup at thesteipen.com

https://www.thestepien.com/2018/03/16/anfernee-simons-wrong-initiator/

Here's the money quote:
However, I believe that more in depth analysis of his translation to higher levels of play raises plenty of questions about his ability to impact the game in a winning manner at the next level. Even if Simons is able to harvest a high percentile outcome for his prospective skill set, it is one that has historically produced players whose team success didn’t live up to their perceived value. He has the sort of upside that is probably still worthy of a top 40 selection but in the grand scheme of things, his inability to create for teammates and lack of defensive impact make it hard to project Simons as the sort of lottery talent that some have labeled him as.
 
I'm trying to go back and re-evaluate Simons as a prospect based on the little information available. I found a decent writeup at thesteipen.com

https://www.thestepien.com/2018/03/16/anfernee-simons-wrong-initiator/

Here's the money quote:
It's not that I disagree with the article or anyone on these boards, however, I would like to get a look at the
rookies during summer league myself rather than take someone else's opinion on the matter, especially
given so little data on Simons. Currently, my opinion is this:
The rookies can do stuff Pat Connaughton can't do.
Pat can do stuff the rookies can't do.
Much of the stuff the rookies can do that Pat can't do CAN'T be taught (which is why Pat hasn't learned them).
Much of the stuff Pat can do that the rookies can't do CAN be taught (and they will learn them).

There are few players that can't learn the fundamentals of the game (unfortunately, Biebs is one).

Secondly, the author does not take into consideration the Combine, or the pre-draft team workouts, which are
both critical tools in analyzing someone based on not only small data sets, but low fidelity data sets. The word
on the street is that not only did he impress the Blazers, he impressed other teams as well (not just the Lakers).
 
So according to the ringers Kevin O’Connor, Portland gave Simons a promise, and that a couple of teams above them were seriously considering him (Minnesota and the Spurs.)

There was also another report that Minnesota had conversations with a couple of teams about moving down from 20, and Portland was one of the teams they talked to. So it seems like Portland really wanted Simons.

Here’s the link: https://www.pscp.tv/ringer/1yNGaXjybqXKj
Skip to about 2hr 47
 
So according to the ringers Kevin O’Connor, Portland gave Simons a promise, and that a couple of teams above them were seriously considering him (Minnesota and the Spurs.)

There was also another report that Minnesota had conversations with a couple of teams about moving down from 20, and Portland was one of the teams they talked to. So it seems like Portland really wanted Simons.

Here’s the link: https://www.pscp.tv/ringer/1yNGaXjybqXKj
Skip to about 2hr 47
Olshey just said a couple weeks ago that he doesn't give promises, ha ha.
 
So according to the ringers Kevin O’Connor, Portland gave Simons a promise, and that a couple of teams above them were seriously considering him (Minnesota and the Spurs.)

There was also another report that Minnesota had conversations with a couple of teams about moving down from 20, and Portland was one of the teams they talked to. So it seems like Portland really wanted Simons.

Here’s the link: https://www.pscp.tv/ringer/1yNGaXjybqXKj
Skip to about 2hr 47

Its funny that if the Spurs had drafted Simons, the same fans that are apoplectic over this pick would've been convinced the Spurs drafted the next great PG.
 
Yeah I remember. I think what happened was they promised they’d take Simons as long as they didn’t trade out of the draft.

But man imagine this board if they traded UP to get Simons???
No difference - it'd still be SSDD.
 
Its funny that if the Spurs had drafted Simons, the same fans that are apoplectic over this pick would've been convinced the Spurs drafted the next great PG.
lol, so true. It's really funny as the ones bitching about Simmons are typically the same ones who pretty much bitch about any Blazer decision.
 
To the Simons haters, let me say this:
I am totally willing to join you if he appears to suck. But right now, I'm seeing that
he can do things some NBA players can't.... and he has a lot of improvement left
in him.
 
lol, so true. It's really funny as the ones bitching about Simmons are typically the same ones who pretty much bitch about any Blazer decision.

The most amazing development has been you know who actually supporting the Blazers draft selections. I’m trying to find the real reason why. I think its because either one could eventually make CJ expendable
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top