2K8 Player Ratings

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I'm disturbed that Jefferson is listed as a SG, and Carter the SF. I'm guessing that's not the fault of the game, but the writer.</p>

-Petey</p>
 
Last year you could edit positions and I pray to god they have that in this year as well.</p>

I had to edit so much crap that it made me wonder if these people even watch basketball.</p>
 
Hmmm, weird, last year they had it right with RJ at the 3 and VC at the 2.
 
I don't mind Kidd or Carter ratings, but krstic and jefferson is disrespectful. Jefferson should be a 84/85 and Krstic like an 80. I know krstic was injured like the whole year, but when amare only played 8 games...he still got a 93 rating the following year higher than his healthy year previous.
 
Most video game ratings are based majorly on offensive stats and I'm sure we all love Kidd, but AI and Baron should rank higher than him.
 
I always find myself editting the original ratings. Its a pain the ass.</p>

IMO:</p>

Kidd=93VC=89RJ=83Krstic=78</p>
 
Kidd at 94 sounds good to me
VC is still a solid 92
RJ looks right at 85
Krstic can go at 79
Sean Williams = 99 potential and vertical
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheMann)</div><div class='quotemain'>Most video game ratings are based majorly on offensive stats and I'm sure we all love Kidd, but AI and Baron should rank higher than him.</div>

</p>agreed. when you look at each individual rating (block, 3fg, steal, speed, etc) there are definitely more offensive stats than defensive...but i guess that's just the way basketball is. although, it would be nice to have an overall rating that's unbiased towards offense.
 
Kidd: 94Vince: 92RJ: 85Nenad: 82</p>

The ratings are bad compared to previous years games. Tony Parker a 90? </p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Kidd: 94Vince: 92RJ: 85Nenad: 82</p>

The ratings are bad compared to previous years games. Tony Parker a 90? </p></div>

He's the finals mvp. I don't think a 90 is too high for him. </p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kiddfan4eva5)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Kidd: 94Vince: 92RJ: 85Nenad: 82</p>

The ratings are bad compared to previous years games. Tony Parker a 90? </p></div>

He's the finals mvp. I don't think a 90 is too high for him. </p>

</div></p>

Still, he should be in the 85-88 range.</p>

</p>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Legacy)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Kidd: 94Vince: 92RJ: 85Nenad: 82</p>

The ratings are bad compared to previous years games. Tony Parker a 90? </p></div>

Common Nenad a 82? He missed an entire season, if anything he should max out between 78-80...and I have seen him play alot, I had him in my basketball pool 2 years in a row. Anyways RJ should be in the mid 80s hes definitley underrated, from one Jefferson to another I think Big Al is overrated (in the game). </p>
 
I still can't get over David Lee over Oden or Durant. </p>

On the other hand the ratings get a big boost from 'awareness,' and David Lee certainly is a smart player.</p>
 
I dont know why people complain about David Lee being ranked higher then Oden and Durant, the man is a double double machine come OFF THE BENCH! and only in his sophmore year. Oden and Durant will obviously be better in the future but give Lee the respect he deserves, he was probably the only positive for the Knicks the entire season.
 
Nenad Krstic didn't missed the entire season, before his departure, he averaged 16 and 7.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MosDefinitely)</div><div class='quotemain'>I dont know why people complain about David Lee being ranked higher then Oden and Durant, the man is a double double machine come OFF THE BENCH! and only in his sophmore year. Oden and Durant will obviously be better in the future but give Lee the respect he deserves, he was probably the only positive for the Knicks the entire season.</div>

I agree. David Lee gives double doubles every night from the beach in limited minutes. Oden and Durant have NOT played a single NBA game yet so they really shouldnt even be rated at 80s. Oden probably wont even get to produce his first 2 years thanks to the surgery and recovery timeso he might even need to be lower than Durant.</p>
 
Alright, that is fair. Good points fellas. Baron over Kidd still grinds my gears. Maybe his USA performance will warrant a change in his ratings at the first roster update.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GMJigga)</div><div class='quotemain'>Alright, that is fair. Good points fellas. Baron over Kidd still grinds my gears. Maybe his USA performance will warrant a change in his ratings at the first roster update.</div>

</p> Baron still shoots better than Kidd, can steal just as good, and is a pretty good passer and rebounder. it doesn't surprise me he's higher than Kidd.
 
I would expect Kidd's on-ball defense, passing, rebounding, and offensive/defensive awareness categories to put him over the top.
 
Sorry, but Kidd's on ball defense sucks especially against smaller quicker guards. His defense flourishes when he's able to play free safety, when he's able to play passing lanes, preventing entry passes, etc. But his on ball defense stinks, always has. That's why I think finding a Kittles type player to play alongside him will improve the team defensively.
 
Then why'd we stick him on Bron in the playoffs?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top