3 stabbed at London Tube station in terror attack, police say

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

"stabbed three people"
Plan B, hard to get guns. Hell knives will terrorize the poor bastards that can't get guns. Allah Akbar!

Stabbing 3 is better than killing 14 or 128.
 
I didn't realize Ben Carson was in London this week.

barfo
 
Have you thought this through? As the only armed man in America, you are now the only target worth 72 virgins.

If I'm the only armed man in America I will be the one the terrorists worship.

Sly Allah!

Sparky3.gif
 
If guns could truly be gotten rid of then yes, terrorist attacks might be like this, 3 stabbed and none dead. But, as long as guns are out there, and with 300,000,000 of them in America, they are here to stay, it's better to have law abiding citizens to also have guns to stop these ass holes.
 
If guns could truly be gotten rid of then yes, terrorist attacks might be like this, 3 stabbed and none dead. But, as long as guns are out there, and with 300,000,000 of them in America, they are here to stay, it's better to have law abiding citizens to also have guns to stop these ass holes.
But law abiding citizens with guns never DO stop these assholes.
 
If I'm the only armed man in America I will be the one the terrorists worship.

Sly Allah!

Sparky3.gif

Classic liberal error. Only the law abiding citizen gave up their guns. The terrorist just turned in the old shit if any, to make it look good.
Sorry my man, you are the only infidel left to count coup on. When you are gone, the caliph will have no need to retain virgins.
 
Classic liberal error. Only the law abiding citizen gave up their guns. The terrorist just turned in the old shit if any, to make it look good.
Sorry my man, you are the only infidel left to count coup on. When you are gone, the caliph will have no need to retain virgins.

Who you calling a liberal?
 
Well my bad! What other answer fit a guy that thinks everyone but him gave up his gun?

A liberal would have given up his gun too. A megalomaniacal dog like myself would keep his. You're not evil enough to understand.

Wait... not evil enough... maybe you're the liberal.
 
I'm sure there are lots of stories every year of law abiding citizens who kill the criminal(s) before any high level damage is done. You likely don't hear about them because it doesn't fit the medias narrative.
Definitely. I seem to remember there being talk that good citizens carrying concealed weapons stopped the Clackamas town center shooting from being worse than it was
 
You also tend to hear about these incidents taking place in areas that don't have high gun ownership and especially high percentages of people carrying guns. School shootings for example take place in areas that are gun-free zones. California is notoriously difficult to get concealed carry permits. So even if you don't see the gun owners shooting and killing the bad guys, their existence is likely affecting where the mass shooters and terrorists consider targets.

All that being said, I do think we need to close loopholes so that every gun sale (including person to person) and ammunition purchase should have to go through a background check or at least added to a database. There are common sense laws that can be implemented but taking guns away from citizens just softens up the target for the bad guys.
 
Seems we need background checks for knives and fire bombs too.
 
that every gun sale (including person to person) and ammunition purchase should have to go through a background check or at least added to a database

I don't agree with this at all! Why the hell does anyone need a background check purchase after purchase even worse, each time you take even temporary possession? Then it becomes even more objectionable when you add getting a background check for ammunition, time after time. Damn man, the background check cost more that the box of ammo! A box of .22 round is pretty damn cheap, the background check is maybe 10 times the cost.

Then there are a lot of guys like me, they load their own. What the fuck you going ask for next, background check when ever I buy anything I could possibly use to make ammo? Lead, copper, steel,
chemicals?

This is not only infringing, it is intrusion into private affairs.
 
Last edited:
Why the hell does anyone need a background check purchase after purchase even worse, each time you take even temporary possession?

Because people commit crimes and become felons. Or join domestic terrorist organizations like Trump for President.
 
I think the correct answer is; train all young people in the use of fire arms. Judge each person in this training whether or not they are fit to joint the ranks of the nation's armed citizens.
Conscientious objectors permitted but will forgo the right to bear arms.

Then people will not be so damned uncomfortable with firearms, after all they are but a tool that does no harm, properly used. It does good when used properly.
We will not be a Nation of sheep waiting for the some son of bitch to proclaim us infidels and start cutting throats or shooting up gatherings, while praising Allah!
 
Judge each person in this training whether or not they are fit to joint the ranks of the nation's armed citizens.
Conscientious objectors permitted but will forgo the right to bear arms

That would be against the constitution.
 
That would be against the constitution.

Naw! Up until recent history, fathers have been performing this function in the normal course of life.
But I have no objection to amending the 2nd amendment. That would be permitted and Constitutional you know. Probably a damn good idea too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top