MarAzul
LongShip
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 21,370
- Likes
- 7,281
- Points
- 113
your mentioning trustworthy is pretty laughable when it was our cia and british intelligence agencies that planned and backed the coup to replace their DEMOCRATICLLY elected prime minister and parliament in 1953, to be replaced by a dictator backed by a brutal secret police on par with gestapo Germany in their torture and terror tactics trained by our very own cia. the middle east had democratic governments following the end of WWII but we didn't like their politics so we replaced them with our own dictators(see also Pakistan).the Tehran embassy take over by student protesters was directly a result of our own actions and complicity. the authoritarian theocracy that is now there filled the void left by the shah fleeing and the students not really having a solid plan for the aftermath... do I trust them completely? no but I certainly can see why they are a wee bit skeptical of our motives. I also think that to try to offer the perception of our government having the moral authority and high ground to dictate to the Iranians is laughable too.
Well laugh you butt off. However, it has nothing to do with moral high ground. There is no basis for trust so no agreement could possibly be worth anything. It certainly will not be a treaty, the Senate has said as much.
However, I do find you can believe in what they say:
"This regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."
"If one permits an infidel to continue in his role as a corrupter of the earth, his moral suffering will be all the worse. If one kills the infidel, and this stops him from perpetrating his misdeeds, his death will be a blessing to him."
I know for a fact that I am deemed an infidel in Iran. How about yourself?
High ground? Geez! I don't even give one fig about it, no nucs for Iran, no trust.