Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, and throw in that Scola jumper in the first quarter that was CLEARLY after the shot clock expired. Difference in the ballgame as it turns out.
Totally agree, i forgot about t hat, but remember pointing it out..can't win a series 5 on 8Oh, and throw in that Scola jumper in the first quarter that was CLEARLY after the shot clock expired. Difference in the ballgame as it turns out.
but the blazers got the majority of the calls in the second half, especially in the 3rd quarter.
battier and artest each had 2 fouls this game.Oh, would that be when Yao collected his one (and only) foul? Yeah, we were really racking up the calls. Or was that when Artest got his one (and only) foul? Battier his one (and only) foul?
Absolutely. No matter what happened early in the game, our fate was in our own hands in the fourth quarter and we choked. It wasn't the ref who poked the ball away from Blake, or who committed the offensive foul while driving to the hoop, or who took a rushed 3-pointer, etc., etc.come on man.. we man up in the 4th quarter we win.. dont blame it on crap in the 1st quarter.
of course when you take into account the 7 intentional fouls at the end of the games(3 from this game, 4 from game 3) that the blazers committed, it drops to a 47-36 difference in fouls called.We just settle for way too many jumpers so we don't get the fouls called. It's not until we're desperate and then we start driving to the hoop and put pressure on the defense. It's just stupid.
But it still doesn't excuse calling everything on G.O. and Joel. Fucking stupid calls. A 54-36 advantage is a pretty wide margin.
the blazers were allowed to be more physical in the 3rd quarter and went into the 4th leading by 6 points.That right there is the problem. It sets a tone for the game. From that point on, the refs made it clear that we couldn't be physical with Houston. On the other end, Houston grabbed and held and mostly got away with it.
over a 6 minute period in the 3rd they called 6 fouls on the rockets and only 1 on portland. they were definitely involved.That's not what I saw. We gambled more on defense by playing the passing lane. We also did a good job of closing in on Houston's drivers and blocked their shots. We got 3 blocks during a stretch of 5 possessions in the third, irrc. We also hit some big shots. It was a combination of Portland being hot on offense and Houston went a little cold. The refs weren't as involved in that third.
yes, at the time i remember thinking multiple of them were questionable just as i remember the first 3 fouls on the blazer centers being complete garbage.can you recollect any of those calls as being bad or questionable?
well 7 of the fouls were intentional fouls by portland at the end of the games. so those are explained pretty easily. oden has consistently been called for cheap fouls regardless of the opposition so if we assume that oden will have two completely garbage foul calls against him per game, that's 4 more fouls easily explained. take away those fouls and the advantage drops down to 43 to 36. that seems like a pretty reasonable amount to think that it might just be the difference between a team with a great defensive reputation and the effect of them playing at home rather than some conspiracy about the nba not wanting the blazers to win in houston.I know which stretch you are speaking of, but I don't remember any of them being egregious. I admit I might have had my rose-colored glass on though. Either way, I find it hard to fathom that a much more physical Houston team would be called for (a lot) less fouls than a soft defensive Portland team. How do you explain the fouls discrepancy in both games in Houston?
