82-64 At Haltime NY vs GSW

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
452
Likes
4
Points
18
A high scoring game i thought it'd be the end of the 3rd not the 2nd. NY could score 150-160 points this game I haven't seen that in awhile
 
David Lee took 17 shots in the first half and has a double-double.

The Knicks are going with seven players, so I wonder if they can maintain this pace.
 
neither team is really shooting spectacularly. just a case of run-and-gun offense meets matador defense.
 
Denver dropped 168 on the Sonics in regulation last March - and then turned around and lost to Seattle three weeks later 151-147 in Double OT.

BNM
 
Wow.

35 pts 21 rebs for David Lee

34 pts 11 rebs for Al Harrington

I wonder what our players would put up in a system like that. Rudy would kill in D'Antoni's system.
 
Doesn't look like they'll get to 150 - possibly not even 140. The Knicks have 132 with 1:50 left.

BNM
 
37/21 for Lee now.

10 pts 22 ast. for Duhon.

Yes, that Chris Duhon.
 
And 22 assists for Duhon.

BNM

Edit: Rats, beat me to it.
 
As entertaining as I'm sure that was, that style of play gets you NOWHERE in the play-offs. Of course, it's far from a given that either of these teams will even make the play-offs. So, let them have their fun in November while they can.

BNM
 
206 FGA, 47 3FGA and 53 FTA.

I'm guessing there weren't a lot of shot clock violations.

BNM
 
You have a point there.

D'Antoni couldn't win with a two-time MVP and Amare with that system in the playoffs. It's something to ponder. I still with we'd run a more uptempo system though.
 
After looking at the boxscore, my jaw dropped to the floor.

Harrington with 36 points and 12 rebounds?!
Duhon with 12 points and 22 assists?!!
Lee with 37 points and 21 rebounds?!!!??

Holy shit. I need to see a re-run of that game.
 
Clearly the Knicks are missing Zach Randolph.
 
Clearly the Knicks are missing Zach Randolph.

Record before the trade: 6-5.

Record after the trade: 2-3.

They have played .400 ball since, in spite of only playing two playoff teams and having three games at home.

Your post is actually accurate, if you remove the sarcasm.

Ed O.
 
And while 138 seems like a huge score, last year after the All-Star break the Nuggets had games of 138, 137, 168 and 147.

Also, after the All-Star break they had games where they gave up 135, 132, 136, 132, 151.

Here's the link to their March 16, 2008 168 - 116 win over the Sonics:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200803160DEN.html

What's amazing is that no one for Denver scored more than 26 points in that game. They did have 8 players in double figures. The pace was similar to tonight's Knicks 138 - 125 win over the Warriors (208 total FGA), but the Nuggets managed to shoot 0.604 from the field (compared to 0.514 for the Knicks tonight) and Denver went to the line 14 more times in that game (30 -35 from the line vs. 17 - 21 for the Knicks tonight).

BNM
 
And while 138 seems like a huge score, last year after the All-Star break the Nuggets had games of 138, 137, 168 and 147.

Also, after the All-Star break they had games where they gave up 135, 132, 136, 132, 151.

Here's the link to their March 16, 2008 168 - 116 win over the Sonics:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200803160DEN.html

What's amazing is that no one for Denver scored more than 26 points in that game. They did have 8 players in double figures. The pace was similar to tonight's Knicks 138 - 125 win over the Warriors (208 total FGA), but the Nuggets managed to shoot 0.604 from the field (compared to 0.514 for the Knicks tonight) and Denver went to the line 14 more times in that game (30 -35 from the line vs. 17 - 21 for the Knicks tonight).

Also amazing is how (relatively) few three pointers the Nuggets needed. 31 is obviously a ton for a normal game, but considering they took 101 shots, it doesn't seem like a gigantic proportion. Intuitively (at least to me), it seems that huge scoring games would be most likely fueled by white-hot shooting from three point territory and an enormous amount of three-pointers taken. Denver hit a big percentage from downtown (though not ludicrous...about 50%) but didn't take a huge amount. Their top three scorers only attempted two three-pointers.
 
Record before the trade: 6-5.

Record after the trade: 2-3.

They have played .400 ball since, in spite of only playing two playoff teams and having three games at home.

Your post is actually accurate, if you remove the sarcasm.

Ed O.

Seems like Randolph had a few more active teammates during his tenure. May have impacted some of those outcomes.
 
Record before the trade: 6-5.

Record after the trade: 2-3.

They have played .400 ball since, in spite of only playing two playoff teams and having three games at home.

Your post is actually accurate, if you remove the sarcasm.

Ed O.

Don't forgot about the absence of Crawford. That also plays a big role.
 
Record before the trade: 6-5.

Record after the trade: 2-3.

They have played .400 ball since, in spite of only playing two playoff teams and having three games at home.

Your post is actually accurate, if you remove the sarcasm.

Ed O.

Yep, Z-Bo will make the Clips a winner for sure.
 
Don't forgot about the absence of Crawford. That also plays a big role.

Who is Crawford? Oh, the Knicks' best player before the trade? Nevermind. Harrington >>> Z-Bo in a D' Antoni system. I don't see how it can be argued at this point.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top