A history making night for RipCityTwo!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
127,139
Likes
147,675
Points
115
As I have mentioned in a few other posts the Blazers have a taken in interest in our forum. Last night this interest took the form of media credentials for Nate and myself. At first my immediate reaction to getting media credentials was akin to winning a golden ticket to Willy Wonka's chocolate factory. I would have a up close and behind the scenes look at this vast and great Blazer basketball factory. After the initial excitement wore off a sort of panic set in. Press credentials also mean I have to write something so incredible that I not only entertain you guys but also make the Blazers want to give us an ongoing presence on press row.

Oh holy hell what have I gotten myself into...


In a 109 to 105 preseason win against the Sacramento Kings the Blazers gave us an exciting insight into what this upcoming season can offer.

While 4 out of the 5 starters remain the same the Blazers are a drastically different team this year. Last year we saw this pattern of playing our starters to near exhaustion and then cringing as we watched some truly not ready for the NBA players be substituted in. It was painful for the fans to watch and I'm sure it was painful for the starters.

This preseason it has been enjoyably different. With the addition of Robin Lopez the Blazers start a traditional NBA unit, PG, SG, SF, PF and CENTER! No more playing a PF out of position as our center. And more importantly when it's time to substitute the Blazers do it cleanly. What I mean by cleanly is that there were so many times last year that one substitution meant up to 3 players on the court having to change positions. This season a pf subs for a pf, a center for a center, a sf for a sf. It's makes it easier for players to stay in their traditional positions but more importantly it makes it clearer to evaluate which bench players work better with the starting unit and which starters work with the backups.

Looking at last night's box score one of the things that jumps out is the 19 turnovers. It's not a giant concern at this time. Most of the turnovers were a result of players lack of familiarity with each other instead of being careless or trying to do too much with the ball.

Batum: First game back after his concussion and had an all around great performance with a team leading 11 rebounds, 5 assists and a very efficient 14 points on 5 of 8 shooting including 3 for 6 from the 3pt line. More importantly when the game was getting close in the 4th quarter he stepped up and hit a clutch 3pt shot with 2 minutes left to give us a 9pt lead.

Lopez: Like Batum he also had an efficient 14 points and 7 rebounds but his contributions go far beyond that. Lopez has an almost Joel Pryzbilla like redass snarl around the basket that instantly transforms into a Patty MIlls like cheerleading for teammates on and off the court. When he's not in the game he's pulling players aside, coaching and talking with them. It's unusual but fun to watch and if he keeps it up he'll quickly become a fan favorite.

Lillard: While leading all players with 28 points some people will focus on his 8 of 19 shooting and only 3 assists . To those people I can only say watch the 3rd quarter of last night's game. Lillard suddenly, effortlessly and amazingly took over the game. He wasn't just the best player on the floor he showed superstar potential.

TRob: See Nate's excellent write up.

Matthews: He's having a puzzling preseason. Not sure if it's injuries, conditioning or what but he's looking a step slow and has no lift.

I'm going to wrap this up for now. Hopefully I'll have time later on to add a little more.

Thanks for reading and Go Blazers!
 
Great job sly. Love it that the blazers are acknowledging our community and letting talented individuals write something about the team we love.
 
Good start for both of you. Just my preference, but the basics are covered all over the place. I like to see more stuff like the following that doesn't show up in the game summary or maybe even on the TV:

Lopez has an almost Joel Pryzbilla like redass snarl around the basket that instantly transforms into a Patty MIlls like cheerleading for teammates on and off the court. When he's not in the game he's pulling players aside, coaching and talking with them. It's unusual but fun to watch and if he keeps it up he'll quickly become a fan favorite.

Keep looking for those interesting angles that others won't cover.
 
And to answer this from nate's thread.

Blazers good.

Didn't have any beer. Funny story, Nate and I watched this lady struggling to push in this cabinet on wheels into the press room after Stott's press conference. It kind of looked like a podium but there was already one in there. After wheeling it into the corner she pulls out a CO2 tank and tap and we quickly realized that it was a keg-orator on wheels. Apparently some of the press (not us) were given free beer tickets. We're not sure what qualifies some of the press for free beer but us and Ben Golliver from Blazers Edge are ones who don't.

We can go 18-0.

Fin.
 
I can't wait to bash on you and Nate like I do canzano and quick!



Just kidding! Awesome write up!
 
And to answer this from nate's thread.

Blazers good.

Didn't have any beer. Funny story, Nate and I watched this lady struggling to push in this cabinet on wheels into the press room after Stott's press conference. It kind of looked like a podium but there was already one in there. After wheeling it into the corner she pulls out a CO2 tank and tap and we quickly realized that it was a keg-orator on wheels. Apparently some of the press (not us) were given free beer tickets. We're not sure what qualifies some of the press for free beer but us and Ben Golliver from Blazers Edge are ones who don't.

We can go 18-0.

Fin.

You should have gotten drunk together and used it as an "excuse" for any down-low action after the game.
 
Did you get to meet the Blazers social media female? :MARIS61:
 
You should have gotten drunk together and used it as an "excuse" for any down-low action after the game.

I did ask Nate if he we should try and use our press credentials to get into the Haunted House at the Memorial Coliseum but we decided that wouldn't be such a good idea.
 
Sly, very good write up. I believe I noticed some grammatical errors. I don't have a solution for said errors, but I wanted to point out your shortcomings. :cheers:
 
Oh snap! How many twitter followers have you gained since writing!??!
 
I won't be impressed till you get your own radio show.
 
I sure hope this shit doesn't get in their heads. I love the non-pot stirring take of the team
 
If the Blazers want to fund it, I would be happy to write a review covering each of the beer stands in the MODA Center.

barfo
 
Ask the blazers if they want a wordy, highly introspective and disorganized recollection analyzing the overstimulating nightmare hellride that is a Blazers game. I'm their man.
 
I can write human interest Canzano-style "there's more to life than basketball" stories about raising a new Blazers fan from an infant due to be born right as the season begins.
 
I can write about ways fans can heckle players from opposing teams so badly that they tell you to fuck off.
 
I ain't writing shit. I just want free tickets.
 
I can write human interest Canzano-style "there's more to life than basketball" stories about raising a new Blazers fan from an infant due to be born right as the season begins.

Sounds more like an episode of the Walking Dead.
 
Lillard: While leading all players with 28 points some people will focus on his 8 of 19 shooting and only 3 assists . To those people I can only say watch the 3rd quarter of last night's game. Lillard suddenly, effortlessly and amazingly took over the game. He wasn't just the best player on the floor he showed superstar potential.

Sly, you should point out that his True Shooting Percentage was 49.2%. This is fantastic for a perimeter player who takes a lot of shots. While the "Eye Test" will convince some, there is some merit to using simple logic. I recommend that for future write-ups.

Congrats on the press pass.
 
Sly, you should point out that his True Shooting Percentage was 49.2%. This is fantastic for a perimeter player who takes a lot of shots. While the "Eye Test" will convince some, there is some merit to using simple logic. I recommend that for future write-ups.

Congrats on the press pass.

I wonder if someday, people will use the ETSP, Eastoff True Shooting Percentage, where all shots are scaled to the 3pt, and thus centers who shoot at 78% from two are actually a 52% ETSP
 
When I look at a box score I may initially look at FG:FGA, but then I pay much more attention to Points Per Shot. FG/FGA underestimates what a player shot while Points Per Shot overestimates. The better thing is TS%, but it is harder to calculate from looking at a box score.

I am actually surprised that more people, especially those in the press don't comment on Points Per Shot.

Quick example:
If a player goes 0 for 3, but has 13 points most people would conclude that the player had a "bad game", when the reality is quite the opposite.

I wonder if someday, people will use the ETSP, Eastoff True Shooting Percentage, where all shots are scaled to the 3pt, and thus centers who shoot at 78% from two are actually a 52% ETSP
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top