kreidertime
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2014
- Messages
- 10,396
- Likes
- 569
- Points
- 113
If you are going to give up say, 2 first round picks for a old player like St. Louis. Not to mention Callahan.
Why not just offer a young, talented RFA a 5.4 to 7.3 contract and give up a 1st, 2nd and 3rd if he team doesn't match. At least you can keep the guy around long term and he's young. Essentially, Sather gave that up for Yandle. who probably will be gone after this year. If he's going to do that, throw away all those picks, at least do it with a RFA offer sheet. That player will help the team short and long term. If those deals won a cup, worth it, find a away to build up the farm again. However, as I've said 100 times the past 2 weeks. They didn't win crap.
I've always been pro RFA offer sheets. I think teams don't do that nearly enough. I have no problem giving up a high pick for a young, proven, NHL player. That's a smart move. Given up high picks for rentals and old guys is useless unless you win it all which they did not.
Why not just offer a young, talented RFA a 5.4 to 7.3 contract and give up a 1st, 2nd and 3rd if he team doesn't match. At least you can keep the guy around long term and he's young. Essentially, Sather gave that up for Yandle. who probably will be gone after this year. If he's going to do that, throw away all those picks, at least do it with a RFA offer sheet. That player will help the team short and long term. If those deals won a cup, worth it, find a away to build up the farm again. However, as I've said 100 times the past 2 weeks. They didn't win crap.
I've always been pro RFA offer sheets. I think teams don't do that nearly enough. I have no problem giving up a high pick for a young, proven, NHL player. That's a smart move. Given up high picks for rentals and old guys is useless unless you win it all which they did not.

.