Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would not patronize that place and my hope is most people wont. But that’s their right.I'm glad you see both sides of the mental illness sweeping the country.
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-coffee-shop-refuses-to-serve-police-12742145.php
Agreed. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of using one example of a nutjob from one side as a "trump" creation.I would not patronize that place and my hope is most people wont. But that’s their right.
There was another coffee shop in SF that designed their seats (spent a ton of money) so they would be uncomfortable to keep customers from spending too long for the price of s coffee. They went out of business, now they don’t need to worry about it any longer.
Both shops have the right to their stupid decisions and we have the right to laugh at their ineptitude.
You must be a Trump supporter, obviously!
Agreed. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of using one example of a nutjob from one side as a "trump" creation.
As if 2 years ago that crazy fuck was a college professor and now.....psycho.
It reminds me of watching YouTube road rage videos where both drivers act like idiots and then blaming only one when there is a crash.
make America hate again....that's what we got here
They're just hanging on by a thread while they can. I suppose some of their children will be taught this but unless they are home schooled it seems unlikely this shit will die off completely.Yeah racist right wing wacko assholes like that guy were around before Trump, but it is Trump who brought them all out of the woodwork. Because if the president can act that way...and a lot of you guys on here encourage and champion it with your cucks and your snowflakes
They're just hanging on by a thread while they can. I suppose some of their children will be taught this but unless they are home schooled it seems unlikely this shit will die off completely.
They're just hanging on by a thread while they can. I suppose some of their children will be taught this but unless they are home schooled it seems unlikely this shit will die off completely.
Its partly through this ill conceived notion that there can't be any fruitful or meaningful conversation on this forum regarding politics.
Too shallow Chris. The issues, nearly all are divisive, right from the get go.
Most Conservatives respect the founding of this Country as a good beginning. The Creation of the Constitution to protect our God given rights, is an Outstanding concept and the basis for the rule of law.
Almost every Liberal want to day, has sound bytes that denigrate the founding of this country, or is calling for ignoring the Constitution is some way, even the results of our once cherished elections.
Why must you be so close minded to that?
I absolutely am not.
I would point out, there are no Constitutional amendments pending. None submitted for consideration in 40 years or so.
We just bicker over the right judge now, that will make the process unnecessary until the point comes where nobody can make sense of it any longer.
Agreed that we can't judge every person that follows doctrine X by the actions of other supporters. However, I think there is a rise, a steep rise in folks acting like this schmuck. In fact, I see a schmuckdom (new word) on both extremes. The difference is although both extremes are ill conceived, the far right contingent I believe to be more dangerous both currently and especially towards the future strength that is America.Agreed. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of using one example of a nutjob from one side as a "trump" creation.
As if 2 years ago that crazy fuck was a college professor and now.....psycho.
It reminds me of watching YouTube road rage videos where both drivers act like idiots and then blaming only one when there is a crash.
We have talked circles around this subject, but I will reiterate one point. You ascribe ill-will or lack of constitutional respect towards a different interpretation of the constitution than what you hold. Fact is, there are 9 SC justices because the constitution needs interpretation.I absolutely am not.
I would point out, there are no Constitutional amendments pending. None submitted for consideration in 40 years or so.
We just bicker over the right judge now, that will make the process unnecessary until the point comes where nobody can make sense of it any longer.
We have talked circles around this subject, but I will reiterate one point. You ascribe ill-will or lack of constitutional respect towards a different interpretation of the constitution than what you hold. Fact is, there are 9 SC justices because the constitution needs interpretation.
But, thats what happens when the government is controlled by one side.
Disagree. The far right has kept quiet and been left alone for years. Their numbers are miniscule. Now they see the left saying things they think in reverse and being told that they're monsters for saying it and that they can't say what they believe.Agreed that we can judge every person that follows doctrine X by the actions of other supporters. However, I think there is a rise, a steep rise in folks acting like this schmuck. In fact, I see a schmuckdom (new word) on both extremes. The difference is although both extremes are ill conceived, the far right contingent I believe to be more dangerous both currently and especially towards the future strength that is America.
We have talked circles around this subject, but I will reiterate one point. You ascribe ill-will or lack of constitutional respect towards a different interpretation of the constitution than what you hold. Fact is, there are 9 SC justices because the constitution needs interpretation.
That could be the case, I’ll hate it but that law will stand. Let’s fight and do our best to get both houses and the president more left-minded than nowProblem is in a year or two all of them will be conservatives with the same interpretations
Fact is, there are 9 SC justices because the constitution needs interpretation.
That could be the case, I’ll hate it but that law will stand. Let’s fight and do our best to get both houses and the president more left-minded than now
Huh?
It is the Liberals that want what should be done by amendments. They have held the majority several times since the last amendment was submitted.
Never started one. Obama care should have been done that way. But what ever, not one.
There is nothing I think we need an amendment to accomplish right now as a Conservative, so your comment just leaves me wondering what you mean?
That could be the case, I’ll hate it but that law will stand. Let’s fight and do our best to get both houses and the president more left-minded than now
There is your closed and narrow mindedness at work.
If they were doing they're jobs there would be such ammendments.
Naw! I have requested a suggested amendments be posted here on this board on several subjects over the years.
Not one time has it been done.
How can you be more open than that?