OT Aaron Rodgers, a Class Act On and Off the Field......

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Mattingly23NY

Turning Fastballs Into Souveneir's ~
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Messages
20,353
Likes
10,810
Points
113
Growing up the way I did it really tugs at my heart strings when I see things like this. God bless you Aaron & to all the others that reach out to these kids.
 
...and a better QB than ___________ .

lol


By the way....when Wilson MADE that 2pt conversion vs GB.... you said if it were a regular season game ....or something like that......any way, you were trying to make a point that in some other circumstance situation he would've just thrown the ball away.

In any case we can always go back for the EXACT wording if you want....
....my question for clarification is:

Would a GB defensive player been allowed to INT that pass and return it for a score?
Maybe for 2 pts? Which would've given GB the LEAD?

How about it....? Yes/No?
 
lol


By the way....when Wilson MADE that 2pt conversion vs GB.... you said if it were a regular season game ....or something like that......any way, you were trying to make a point that in some other circumstance situation he would've just thrown the ball away.

In any case we can always go back for the EXACT wording if you want....
....my question for clarification is:

Would a GB defensive player been allowed to INT that pass and return it for a score?
Maybe for 2 pts? Which would've given GB the LEAD?

How about it....? Yes/No?



...lol...looks like I was right, I have a stalker.

...but to answer the question that is again about to blow up in your face, ...NO, a defensive player cannot intercept a 2 point conversion and "return it for a score"...that's in college football only. (NCAA Rule 8-3-2-d-1) ...in HS and Pro football the play is dead. This was also stated by me in the thread you are so feebly referencing...go ahead...check.

...it appears you have as much to learn about pro football as you do about baseball...and if you would not try so hard to constantly and obsessively prove me wrong about something, hell anything, maybe you wouldn't look so foolish.
 
Last edited:
lol


By the way....when Wilson MADE that 2pt conversion vs GB.... you said if it were a regular season game ....or something like that......any way, you were trying to make a point that in some other circumstance situation he would've just thrown the ball away.

In any case we can always go back for the EXACT wording if you want....
....my question for clarification is:

Would a GB defensive player been allowed to INT that pass and return it for a score?
Maybe for 2 pts? Which would've given GB the LEAD?

How about it....? Yes/No?


I'm beginning to think that you like pushing things just to get a reaction.
 
...I noticed you avoided replying to my previous reply...lockjaw?...or embarrassment?

...also, I never mentioned Wilson in this thread...you are the one who decided to irrelevantly bring his name up. But thanx again for hijacking yet another thread and taking it off-topic.
 
Last edited:
...I noticed you avoided replying to my previous reply...lockjaw?...or embarrassment?

...also, I never mentioned Wilson in this thread...you are the one who decided to irrelevantly bring his name up. But thanx again for hijacking yet another thread and taking it off-topic.


Never said you mentioned his name.
And thanks for the "clarification" I asked for.

Wilson 9 ______ 0
 
...then why did you feel the need to bring his name up?...he was not a part of the thread topic and you're still talking about him. ...seriously, why did you even bring him up?...what does he have to do with a thread discussing Rodgers doing a good deed on behalf of some youngsters?

...and "clarification"?...lmao...is that what they call it now when someone totally screws the pooch?
 
Cut it out, you know you love to spar with me.

In all seriousness, you're a great conversationalist, poster, and I really welcome and appreciate the opportunities to exchange thoughts,ideas and maybe even a couple of naysay sessions.
 
Last edited:
Cut it out, you know you love spar with me.

In all seriousness, you're a great conversationalist, poster, and I really welcome and appreciate the opportunities to exchange thoughts,ideas and maybe even a couple of naysay sessions.


Forgive me for jumping in but there's a big difference between being a conversationalist & being an antagonist. Lately Blg you've become the latter.

If it is you mission to completely alienate yourself from everyone on this board you're heading in the right direction. Just saying.
 
Forgive me for jumping in but there's a big difference between being a conversationalist & being an antagonist. Lately Blg you've become the latter.

If it is you mission to completely alienate yourself from everyone on this board you're heading in the right direction. Just saying.


Example?
 
...lol...looks like I was right, I have a stalker.

...but to answer the question that is again about to blow up in your face, ...NO, a defensive player cannot intercept a 2 point conversion and "return it for a score"...that's in college football only. (NCAA Rule 8-3-2-d-1) ...in HS and Pro football the play is dead. This was also stated by me in the thread you are so feebly referencing...go ahead...check.

...it appears you have as much to learn about pro football as you do about baseball...and if you would not try so hard to constantly and obsessively prove me wrong about something, hell anything, maybe you wouldn't look so foolish.

I'm stunned blg would bring this back up, like a kid who just won't take no or yes for an answer, always trying to prove He's right; were all wrong, and its only us, who don't know a damn thing about anything, but then He's the expert on all matters..........NOT....!!!!!!!!!!!! NOT on 1 issue at all.

blg, do you NOT SEE this IS the Answer....geezus, are we gonna' resurrect another old post, just for the sake of arguing. Therein lies the difference b/t a healthy debate vs a pompous argument, to try and prove your right......

Lastly, I've been chatting via this board, and the OLD BSPN boards, since 2005, and I don't see anyone here other than yourself, who just wont give it up, and always HAS TO BE RIGHT......

and NO this post does not need hi-jacked over your issues. It all about the Humanitarian Aaron Rodgers IS. Incredible Hospitable Man and QB too.....!
 
Last edited:
See Wednesday nights channel 2 (CBS) 10PM

Thanks Rick, I sure will check out CBS at 10pm, but then it might be 7pm out here....I'll check the Tv guide out, much appreciated....!
 
I'm stunned blg would bring this back up, like a kid who just won't take no or yes for an answer, always trying to prove He's right; were all wrong, and its only us, who don't know a damn thing about anything, but then He's the expert on all matters..........NOT....!!!!!!!!!!!! NOT on 1 issue at all.

blg, do you NOT SEE this IS the Answer....geezus, are we gonna' resurrect another old post, just for the sake of arguing. Therein lies the difference b/t a healthy debate vs a pompous argument, to try and prove your right......

Lastly, I've been chatting via this board, and the OLD BSPN boards, since 2005, and I don't see anyone here other than yourself, who just wont give it up, and always HAS TO BE RIGHT......

and NO this post does not need hi-jacked over your issues. It all about the Humanitarian Aaron Rodgers IS. Incredible Hospitable Man and QB too.....!


Now how about those similar quotes to Hank's from other MLB owners regarding a rival team? .....and I'll even accept those as far back from the age of Bill Veeck....lol....just to make it easier.

YOU were the one who gave an admonishing speech in response to my post about how I liked Hank's comments on "REDSOX NATION".
But you were too busy and preoccupied with attacking Hank instead of putting it into it's proper perspective.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Rick, I sure will check out CBS at 10pm, but then it might be 7pm out here....I'll check the Tv guide out, much appreciated....!


I made the TV reference because of what Ron referred to blg as. You'll see what I mean when you see what show is on at that time.
 
Now how about those similar quotes to Hank's from other MLB owners .....and I'll even accept those from the age of Bill Veeck....lol....just to make it easier.

YOU were the one who gave an admonishing speech in response to my post about how I liked Hank's comment on "REDSOX NATION".

HERE WE GO AGAIN, DO YOU NOT PAY ATTENTION OR DID YOU NOT READ, DO NOT HI-JACK THIS THREAD IT IS RESERVED FOR Aaron Rodgers Humanitarian efforts. That I thought was perfectly clear...?

You obviously were not even sucking on a pacifier when Veeck or Finley were lighting up MLB Owners NOTE: PLURAL or more than half the damned league, and like I said O'Malley and Horace Stoneham certainly had some strong words for each other against both Teams. Obviously these Owners DID NOT go out for Dinner or drinks anytime if at all. Do you really think O'Malley was a Nun when Marichal broke his bat over Roseboro's head. We've already had this discussion, and sadly NOTHING HAS CHANGED......!

You know you are unique and one of a kind in several ways. You hi-jack threads to re-apply your ignorant questions upon people who have lived more than what you've ever read......NOTHING HAS CHANGED, AND YOU STILL INSULT OTHERS BY HI-JACKING, SAD SON SAD....!

2ndly, you insists on being right, NOTHING has changed....!

3rd- Your always asking others to do your Own Homework. If you don't know the answers to the Q's you ask, because you don't know the answers, then GOOGLE YOUR OWN HOMEWORK. IT'S IMPOLITE TO ASK OTHERS TO DO IT FOR YOU. I HAVE NOT SEEN THIS TREND REVERSE ITSELF, SINCE YOU CAME ABOARD. SO PLEASE CHILL OUT.....and take the sucker out of your mouth when you talk, gibberish is NOT spoken here, and there is NO Dictionary for Gibberish.....NOTHING HAS CHANGED....!
 
I made the TV reference because of what Ron referred to blg as. You'll see what I mean when you see what show is on at that time.

And because I thought (in response to your post) that the difference between Gardner stealing 20something bases instead of 30,40 something bases is not as important as him improving on his .327 (2014) OBP and .256 BA?

Is this one of your issues? Sorry, I stand by it.
 
once again, this Post is about Aaron Rodger's Humanitarian Heart, so don't Hi-Jack it......

When you do as much, (HI-JACKING THREADS)......its like letting you in the door, so you can piss on our legs or furniture.....

but then NOTHING HAS CHANGED....!!!

Are you afraid of change or have a phobia over change, as well as you've got to be on the NO FLY lists, as all it seems you do anymore is HI-Jack, insult others intelligence, and bring up old threads onto new threads., Can you not see this Post is NOT About MLB OWNERS????????? Take a look at the Post name or create a new one for a forum you can argue with others, but then few if any would bother to read it....!!!
 
People need to hear more about these kind of acts. Not all athletes are money hungry bastards. Rogers is living proof of that.
 
And because I thought (in response to your post) that the difference between Gardner stealing 20something bases instead of 30,40 something bases is not as important as him improving on his .327 (2014) OBP and .256 BA?

Is this one of your issues? Sorry, I stand by it.


Holy shit! let it go dude. So what do think about the great thing Rogers is doing?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top