Aborted Babies Provide Electricity for Oregonians

[PapaG]

Why? Do you have some sort of emotional attachment to fetal tissue?

Would it matter if I did?

 

[Haakzilla]

UPDATE: LifeSiteNews reports that the Marion County Board of Commissioners have announced that the practice of burning aborted babies for power will be stopped immediately. They claim that they were unaware of the practice, but will now put it to an end.

 

[crandc]

Not suprisingly a lot of vitriol, a lot of personal insults, very few facts.
Fetal tissue can come from: an abortion, a miscarriage, a stillbirth, the placenta of a live birth.
Something has to be done with it.
If a woman has a miscarriage (medical term is spontaneous abortion), what do you think should be done with the fetal tissue?
If a woman has an induced abortion, should the fetal tissue be treated differently than that from a spontaneous?

It's easy to say OUTRAGE, a lot harder to look at facts.

And what is your conclusion?
You don't like the way fetal tissue is disposed of, therefore every woman (and barely pubescent girl) must be forced to carry every pregnancy to term under every circumstance, even if it kills her? And all forms of birth control outlawed? And no sex education? Because that is exactly the position of the organization cited in this thread.

Again, what is the point of the thread except to say Papa G is once again OUTRAGED I TELL YOU

In the films Abortion for Survival, the woman gives consent to have her abortion filmed, it's probably on YouTube and not gruesome at all, if anyone wants to see.

 

[donkiez]

I'm wondering why you would go out of your way to confront a handful of anti-abortion protesters. Whether or not I agree with them (and I don't), it's not like they have some absurd position that needs to be mocked. The pro-abortion side has to construct a new reality in able to morally justify abortion.

The better question is why a handful of abortion protesters would go out of their way to mock the people getting abortions. Its not like the girls heading in for procedures have some absurd position that needs to b mocked. The pro life side has constructed a reality where they need to play the victim and impose their beliefs on everyone else.

Your comment questions sly for participating in the same behavior the protesters are engaging in, when the protesters created the situation by being there and voicing their opinions. Shame on you sly.

 

[BlazerWookee]

That's a very broad stereotype. Anyhow, how about this for the next family photo with Ethan!

I don't know, it's usually dudes, not broads, that fit that stereotype...

 

[Denny Crane]

You think we should have funerals and burials for abortions?

I think we should burn the remains. It's potentially deadly (disease) material.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

I think we should burn the remains. It's potentially deadly (disease) material.

Burning doesn't work, you have to shoot or stab them in the head or else you get zombie babies.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

ULTIMATE POWER

 

[3RA1N1AC]

Women who have miscairages should be charged with manslaughter

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Women who have miscairages should be charged with manslaughter

babyslaughter.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

babyslaughter.

One of the most beautiful things in the world

Or maybe just gas

 

[Sinobas]

Too bad you weren't aborted.

 

[PapaG]

Too bad you weren't aborted.

Many other people, all of them smarter than you, have said, hoped, or wished the same thing many times.

 

[MarAzul]

Not suprisingly a lot of vitriol, a lot of personal insults, very few facts.
Fetal tissue can come from: an abortion, a miscarriage, a stillbirth, the placenta of a live birth.
Something has to be done with it.
If a woman has a miscarriage (medical term is spontaneous abortion), what do you think should be done with the fetal tissue?
If a woman has an induced abortion, should the fetal tissue be treated differently than that from a spontaneous?

It's easy to say OUTRAGE, a lot harder to look at facts.

And what is your conclusion?
You don't like the way fetal tissue is disposed of, therefore every woman (and barely pubescent girl) must be forced to carry every pregnancy to term under every circumstance, even if it kills her? And all forms of birth control outlawed? And no sex education? Because that is exactly the position of the organization cited in this thread.

Again, what is the point of the thread except to say Papa G is once again OUTRAGED I TELL YOU

In the films Abortion for Survival, the woman gives consent to have her abortion filmed, it's probably on YouTube and not gruesome at all, if anyone wants to see.

My dear, the fucking word is gruesome.

 

[MARIS61]

Babies are not mentioned in the article at all. Neither are adults or teens. No human at all. We're talking about medical waste, which is burned by law to protect all live humans, including babies, from disease.

As a bonus, electricity is provided in a safer manner than using a coal or nuclear plant, both of which have actually not only killed babies but also caused many more to be born with unspeakably horrific mutations and diseases.

 

[MarAzul]

Babies are not mentioned in the article at all. Neither are adults or teens. No human at all. We're talking about medical waste, which is burned by law to protect all live humans, including babies, from disease.

As a bonus, electricity is provided in a safer manner than using a coal or nuclear plant, both of which have actually not only killed babies but also caused many more to be born with unspeakably horrific mutations and diseases.

Actually I would much rather see Nuclear Plants a plenty, making so dang much electricity that we could produce Hydrogen by the tanker. Running that stuff to fuel the autos and the only worry
was what to do next after we fill that Mountain in Nevada with waste in about 10000 years down the road.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

What to do after we fill the mountains with toxic waste? Hire poor people to eat it all. Duh.

 

[Denny Crane]

What to do after we fill the mountains with toxic waste? Hire poor people to eat it all. Duh.

Fill the next mountain over. Duh.

I lived about 100 miles from Yucca mountain, where they were going to store the waste. I was 100% in favor of using Yucca mountain, and still am.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

They should fill mt rushmore

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

I BET THESE NON-HUMAN TISSUES MASSES ARE DELICIOUS.

 

[Denny Crane]

Nuclear waste is routinely reprocessed in Europe, but both Carter and Obama refuse to allow it here. We would be able to produce 60x more energy from the same amount of fuel. It would then take 2000 years to fill Yucca Mountain.

 

[MarAzul]

Fill rushmore too, no problem.

 

[MarAzul]

Nuclear waste is routinely reprocessed in Europe, but both Carter and Obama refuse to allow it here. We would be able to produce 60x more energy from the same amount of fuel. It would then take 2000 years to fill Yucca Mountain.

The US Navy has the science down. It's been working well for 60 years.

 

[cmeese47]

Man I just need to figure how to power a car with this.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

It really does cost an arm and a leg for electricity these days. And placentas.

 

[Denny Crane]

Steam power.

See?

 

[3RA1N1AC]

 

[barfo]

Nuclear waste is routinely reprocessed in Europe, but both Carter and Obama refuse to allow it here.

Huh? Carter and Obama? Weren't there some other presidents in between there that could have allowed it? Or are you saying Jimmy Carter currently has some executive power? Or are you talking about somebody else named Carter?

barfo

 

[Denny Crane]

Huh? Carter and Obama? Weren't there some other presidents in between there that could have allowed it? Or are you saying Jimmy Carter currently has some executive power? Or are you talking about somebody else named Carter?

barfo

You are right.

http://www.emagazine.com/earth-talk/reprocessing-nuclear-waste/

More recently, George W. Bush pushed a plan, the Global Nuclear Energy Project (GNEP), to promote the use of nuclear power and subsidize the development of a new generation of “proliferation-resistant” nuclear reprocessing technologies that could be rolled out to the commercial nuclear energy sector. Federal scientists came up with promising spins on reprocessing nuclear fuel while minimizing the resulting waste.

But in June of 2009 the Obama administration cancelled GNEP, citing cost concerns. Proponents of nuclear power—and of reprocessing in particular—were far from pleased with GNEP’s axing, especially in light of Obama’s earlier decision to close Yucca Mountain as the U.S.’s future nuclear waste repository. “GNEP may have gone away, but the need to recycle spent fuel in this country is more important than ever because of the government’s stupid decision to close Yucca Mountain,” said Danny Black of the Southern Carolina Alliance, a regional economic development group, on the Ecopolitology blog. “Without Yucca Mountain, the pressure is on the industry to do more with recycling.”

 

[3RA1N1AC]

More recently, George W. Bush pushed a plan, the Global Nuclear Energy Project (GNEP), to promote the use of nuclear power and subsidize the development of a new generation of “proliferation-resistant” nuclear reprocessing technologies that could be rolled out to the commercial nuclear energy sector.

this must infuriate you! the invisible hand of the free market needs no such intrusions!

But in June of 2009 the Obama administration cancelled GNEP, citing cost concerns.

at least the president gets it, a true fiscal conservative