maxiep
RIP Dr. Jack
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,321
- Likes
- 5,919
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems he could have arranged for someone to cover his shift regardless of socialized medicine.
It seems he could have arranged for someone to cover his shift regardless of socialized medicine.
Someone to cover his shift? There are no backups in socialized medicine. I don't think people realize how the patient to healthcare providers ratios increase. For example, there are roughly six patients for every nurse in hospitals in the US. In Britain, the ratio is 15:1.
I'm not sure how socialized became a bad word in this county.
I'm not sure how socialized became a bad word in this county.
The UK also pays about 1/3 of what the US pays per person and that gap is increasing. The UK also has a longer life expectancy than the US by a significant margin.
In other socialized medicine news, Cuba has the highest doctor to patient ratio in the world.
I'm not sure how socialized became a bad word in this county.
For example, there are roughly six patients for every nurse in hospitals in the US. In Britain, the ratio is 15:1.
The country [U.S.] has fairly low rates of doctors and hospital beds relative to its population.
And the metrics show the US health care system is the best in the world. For example, breast cancer survival rates in the UK are 77%. In the US, it's 94%.
You're using the wrong metric. Life expectancy has too much to do with lifestyle, where what you really want to measure is how a patient does once they enter the system. And the metrics show the US health care system is the best in the world. For example, breast cancer survival rates in the UK are 77%. In the US, it's 94%.
As for Cuba, garbage in, garbage out. It doesn't matter how many medical workers they have.
You're using the wrong metric. Life expectancy has too much to do with lifestyle, where what you really want to measure is how a patient does once they enter the system. And the metrics show the US health care system is the best in the world. For example, breast cancer survival rates in the UK are 77%. In the US, it's 94%.
As for Cuba, garbage in, garbage out. It doesn't matter how many medical workers they have.
It’s no more wrong of a metric to use than your example of one poor decision equating to all of social medicine. And while there are many variables that go into life expectancy I would argue that it is a valuable metric as lifestyle/education and preventative medicine are just as important as reactive medicine.
As for Cuba, they are not a garbage medical system. For a "third world" country they rate equal to or better than many first world countries in medical care.
The point I was trying to make in the article--I lived with VardVal for a few years--was that when you begin to treat health care providers like bureaucrats with rules instead of people hired by the patient and directly responsible for them, you get these kind of outcomes.
One more thing: Preventitive health care is when it gets fucking scary in socialized health care. When health care is collectively paid by the people, your personal health becomes the business of society. Systembolaget (Sweden's liquor store monopoly) tracks your personal purchases and limits them by time and quantity. Who wants to live in a country where you're limited on how much alcohol you choose to purchase for yourself? Not me. If someone wants to drink themselves to death, it's none of my concern (as long as they don't drive). My body and my health is my business. I want yours to be yours. I find it creepy that my health was viewed as the business of complete strangers.
I don't find the argument "Cuban health care sucks less than the rest of Cuba" very convincing.
