Exclusive All Things Rachel Maddow

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
there was a dope Rachel Maddow porn scene on pornhub i think, 3 way lesbo, obviously.
 
I have nothing nice to say about her. Just another ugly, elitist Liberal hag with bad hair.
 
Rachel's ratings are skyrocketing because of her Trump Russia coverage. Rachel is a Real American lesbian!
 
I have a better idea. If you are interested in Rachel Maddow, why not watch her show? Because it's easier to copy and paste? Because you might catch the gay?
 
crandc said:
I have a better idea. If you are interested in Rachel Maddow, why not watch her show? Because it's easier to copy and paste? Because you might catch the gay?
Click to expand...

She doesn't seem very gay.
More like,
she is suffering pain that won't go away.
 
You could have titled this thread "My Scab Collection - Photographed in Detail" and it would have been more interesting to me.
 
Jade Falcon said:
I have nothing nice to say about her. Just another ugly, elitist Liberal hag with bad hair.
Click to expand...
Pardon the PC-ish response, but it's sad to me that of the five elements of your description of her, one is gender-biased and two others focus on her appearance. These are the kinds of comments that lead feminists to continue to bang the sexism drum.
 
What do you expect from Jade Falcon and MarAzul, Platypus? That they would actually watch a television program hosted by a liberal lesbian with a Ph.D.? Hell no. So much easier to insult her.

She is a million miles from Coulter. Coulter throws out insults. Maddow has never used a personal insult on her show against any guest and has in fact been criticized for being too polite to people like Kellyanne Conway. Coulter throws out crap without worrying about facts. Maddow, when she introduces a guest, summarizes the issue and asks if she got it right. She fact-checks herself and issues corrections when need be (she calls it her Department of Corrections). Maddow is capable of humor. Coulter's idea of humor is to insult people whom she considers inferior. Maddow uses precise language. Coulter uses "liberal" as all purpose insult. Maddow rarely if ever raises her voice. Shrieking is the common denominator of right wing talk shows. Maddow is in a long term relationship. Coulter has affairs with married men while claiming to be the world's greatest Christian. Maddow comes off as a genuinely nice person. The kind I'd like to go have a drink or cup of tea with. If I saw Coulter I'd run fast in the other direction.

The only thing they have in common is being on TV and being female.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Pardon the PC-ish response, but it's sad to me that of the five elements of your description of her, one is gender-biased and two others focus on her appearance. These are the kinds of comments that lead feminists to continue to bang the sexism drum.
Click to expand...

Wow, thank you... you are absolutely right! That's exactly what I thought about the original post... it's okay if you don't agree with the reporter's opinion but that kind of description would never be said of a male reporter. It's just silly and petty and not a productive way to have a discussion when all you have to contribute is... She's ugly and gay.
 
Spud147 said:
Wow, thank you... you are absolutely right! That's exactly what I thought about the original post... it's okay if you don't agree with the reporter's opinion but that kind of description would never be said of a male reporter. It's just silly and petty and not a productive way to have a discussion when all you have to contribute is... She's ugly and gay.
Click to expand...

I've got to provide a positive representation for the conservatives in here somehow. :)
 
Rachel is dominating the ratings right now by tearing the Siberian Candidate a new asshole every night. I can't get enough :bwpopcorn:
 
I may not like how she incessantly repeats a point, but that's a minor quibble. She's uber-smart, funny, fair, clever, and well-read. She knows her stuff, and gives guests a fair shot. The problem for many is that she's almost too smart, female, and can back up her opinions with facts.
 
I personally like her roundabout way of leading into a story, especially her top story. I know some people don't like it but that is the way my mind works as well. And it's interesting and often tells me something I did not know or had forgotten (again unlike Coulter, who is hardly educational).

I just wish she'd agree to speak at Castro Valley Pride - for some reason, maybe not happy in her early life, she always says no.

I frankly admit Rachel is one of my crushes (the other is Tara Vander Veer, I seem to like smart athletic ladies, who'd guess?)
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Pardon the PC-ish response, but it's sad to me that of the five elements of your description of her, one is gender-biased and two others focus on her appearance. These are the kinds of comments that lead feminists to continue to bang the sexism drum.
Click to expand...

If factual reporting was one of her "elements" we could refer to that.

Sadly, it is not.

For balance, analyze what elements Maddow and feminists use when describing US President Trump.

Nazi, fascist, clown, misogynist, ORANGE, small hands, necktie hangs too low...
 
crandc said:
What do you expect from Jade Falcon and MarAzul, Platypus? That they would actually watch a television program hosted by a liberal lesbian with a Ph.D.? Hell no. So much easier to insult her.

She is a million miles from Coulter. Coulter throws out insults. Maddow has never used a personal insult on her show against any guest and has in fact been criticized for being too polite to people like Kellyanne Conway. Coulter throws out crap without worrying about facts. Maddow, when she introduces a guest, summarizes the issue and asks if she got it right. She fact-checks herself and issues corrections when need be (she calls it her Department of Corrections). Maddow is capable of humor. Coulter's idea of humor is to insult people whom she considers inferior. Maddow uses precise language. Coulter uses "liberal" as all purpose insult. Maddow rarely if ever raises her voice. Shrieking is the common denominator of right wing talk shows. Maddow is in a long term relationship. Coulter has affairs with married men while claiming to be the world's greatest Christian. Maddow comes off as a genuinely nice person. The kind I'd like to go have a drink or cup of tea with. If I saw Coulter I'd run fast in the other direction.

The only thing they have in common is being on TV and being female.
Click to expand...

I watch both and consider them broadcast clones with total opposite viewpoints, although Maddow resorts to personal insults, already discredited fake news, and stuff she apparently makes up on a daily basis while Coulter more often refers to the actual views and actions of people she is criticizing. Neither makes any attempt to hide or put aside their contempt for the other party, leaving both with 0 credibility as journalists. Neither presents a balanced report. On her show, Maddow often appears to be suffering severe mental illness/depression and I expect her to end up in a hospital soon.
 
MARIS61 said:
If factual reporting was one of her "elements" we could refer to that.

Sadly, it is not.

For balance, analyze what elements Maddow and feminists use when describing US President Trump.

Nazi, fascist, clown, misogynist, ORANGE, small hands, necktie hangs too low...
Click to expand...

Yes Rachel seems to be a good model for the left. Even our own up standing representatives of the progressive righteous mimic her tool act.

Example, a post in another thread.

Spud147 said:
embarrassment to our country, stunning ineptitude, this cannot go on.
Click to expand...

Ominous!
What is the action plan?
 
MarAzul said:
Yes Rachel seems to be a good model for the left. Even our own up standing representatives of the progressive righteous mimic her tool act.

Example, a post in another thread.



Ominous!
What is the action plan?
Click to expand...

Yes, I saw it in your other post and acknowledge that you like the word ominous.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Pardon the PC-ish response, but it's sad to me that of the five elements of your description of her, one is gender-biased and two others focus on her appearance. These are the kinds of comments that lead feminists to continue to bang the sexism drum.
Click to expand...

Then perhaps she shouldn't be a raving stereotype of an elitist Liberal, who snubs her nose at everything that isn't an elitist Liberal like her.

crandc said:
What do you expect from Jade Falcon and MarAzul, Platypus? That they would actually watch a television program hosted by a liberal lesbian with a Ph.D.? Hell no. So much easier to insult her.

She is a million miles from Coulter. Coulter throws out insults. Maddow has never used a personal insult on her show against any guest and has in fact been criticized for being too polite to people like Kellyanne Conway. Coulter throws out crap without worrying about facts. Maddow, when she introduces a guest, summarizes the issue and asks if she got it right. She fact-checks herself and issues corrections when need be (she calls it her Department of Corrections). Maddow is capable of humor. Coulter's idea of humor is to insult people whom she considers inferior. Maddow uses precise language. Coulter uses "liberal" as all purpose insult. Maddow rarely if ever raises her voice. Shrieking is the common denominator of right wing talk shows. Maddow is in a long term relationship. Coulter has affairs with married men while claiming to be the world's greatest Christian. Maddow comes off as a genuinely nice person. The kind I'd like to go have a drink or cup of tea with. If I saw Coulter I'd run fast in the other direction.

The only thing they have in common is being on TV and being female.
Click to expand...

I have nothing against her being female. I have everything against her being biased and self-righteous. And she DOES insult people, and her constant bashing of Trump is proof of this. You really want me to believe she wouldn't insult Trump voters if she thought she could get away with it?

I don't think so.

MARIS61 said:
If factual reporting was one of her "elements" we could refer to that.

Sadly, it is not.

For balance, analyze what elements Maddow and feminists use when describing US President Trump.

Nazi, fascist, clown, misogynist, ORANGE, small hands, necktie hangs too low...
Click to expand...

Yep. Thank you.

MARIS61 said:
I watch both and consider them broadcast clones with total opposite viewpoints, although Maddow resorts to personal insults, already discredited fake news, and stuff she apparently makes up on a daily basis while Coulter more often refers to the actual views and actions of people she is criticizing. Neither makes any attempt to hide or put aside their contempt for the other party, leaving both with 0 credibility as journalists. Neither presents a balanced report. On her show, Maddow often appears to be suffering severe mental illness/depression and I expect her to end up in a hospital soon.
Click to expand...

There you go. Said it better than I could have.
 
Jade Falcon said:
Then perhaps she shouldn't be a raving stereotype of an elitist Liberal, who snubs her nose at everything that isn't an elitist Liberal like her.
Click to expand...
I take no issue with the elitist liberal part of your comment. It's the "ugly" "hag" "with bad hair" parts that smack of sexism, because they have nothing to do with her political opinions or commentary, and everything to do with her conformity to societal gender norms.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
I take no issue with the elitist liberal part of your comment. It's the "ugly" "hag" "with bad hair" parts that smack of sexism, because they have nothing to do with her political opinions or commentary, and everything to do with her conformity to societal gender norms.
Click to expand...

Alright, fair enough.
 
Jade Falcon said:
I have nothing against her being female. I have everything against her being biased and self-righteous. And she DOES insult people, and her constant bashing of Trump is proof of this. You really want me to believe she wouldn't insult Trump voters if she thought she could get away with it?
Click to expand...
Are you biased? Are you self-righteous? Do you insult people? I think you have exhibited all of these things in this very thread.
 
Sedatedfork said:
Are you biased? Are you self-righteous? Do you insult people? I think you have exhibited all of these things in this very thread.
Click to expand...

Insult people? Occasionally. I'm not proud of it, but I'm not perfect. I prefer to try and insult someone's POV or opinion, rather than the person themselves. But I do occasionally insult the person.

Biased? Why; because I don't swallow the Trump hate that Liberals so willingly do? Because I despise Hollywood Liberals and Leftist talk show hosts who cherry-pick stats and facts with Leftist agendas?

Snort. If that makes me biased, then I'll wear that badge proudly.

Self-righteous? Give me a break. There's far more self-righteousness on this forum from others than somebody making a quip about Rachel Maddow.

Now, if you'll excuse me...I have many chores to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top