- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,283
- Likes
- 147,787
- Points
- 115
"Will change the way you look at the Blazer's future"
1:30pm
1:30pm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well? it's 1:30 and I'm nowhere near a radio.
Who cares what Vance says? He doesn't work for the Blazers, so he doesn't know shit
Whoo hoo
From Kenny, via two GM's... it's a likely scenario that the amnesty clause will be back into the new bargaining agreement. A team can waive one contract and that contract comes off the books. Team still has to pay the player, but the contract comes off the cap and luxury tax. We used this same clause to waive Derek Anderson many years ago.
old ESPN article about the amnesty clause:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/columns/story?columnist=stein_marc&id=2112912
In the summer of 2005, the new CBA provided an amnesty clause: a one-time opportunity for each team to waive one, and only one, player and avoid having him count against the team's luxury tax calculation. The amnesty provision only affected the team's luxury tax status, though. The waiving team must continue to pay the player, his salary continues to count against their salary cap, and all other salary calculations are unaffected. However, the team may not re-sign or re-acquire the player for the length of the terminated contract. In all other respects, the player is treated just like any other waived player.
The amnesty provision was derisively named the Allan Houston Rule (with Houston being symbolic of a free-agent class that was signed to ill-advised maximum contracts before the luxury tax was initiated), but the Knicks chose not to waive Houston under its terms, instead releasing Jerome Williams. Other players who were waived using the amnesty provision included Michael Finley, Brian Grant and Derek Anderson.
Will the Blazers have the balls to do it is the big question
Can we change the topic of the thread to something like "Amnesty clause - waive Roy" so people know what its about and 10 others dont start new threads on the same topic?
http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2010/02/dwill-unhappy-about-brewer-trade/“I think if we’d make a trade it would be something a little different than that. You look at all the teams that are getting better around the West and we essentially get worse, if you ask me. That’s why I signed a three-year deal.”
DERON WILLIAMS!!!!!!!!!!
http://sportstwo.com/s2/NBASalaries.php
i think he has a player option after this year according to that. and remember when he was pissed when they traded brewer for nothing. he was quoted to say
http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2010/02/dwill-unhappy-about-brewer-trade/
omfg make it happen
williams, mathews, batum, aldridge, oden/???????
Jury's still out on G.O. and B-Roy
yes but both parties like the clause because players can get paid for two contracts. and owners get a mulligan. if we didn't have paul allen no way we could do this. but with CP3 going to NY probably. what other team would have the cap room/talent we have to offer? no one...This, of course, hinges on what comes out of the new CBA.
But that core would be title contenders for years to come.
That would be unbelievably good fortune. Thanks for the info!
I had never even considered a return to the amnesty clause, but it really does make sense for both the owners (you get one contract freebie) and players (waiving a player via the amnesty clause and opening cap space allows for another player to have a large contract).
Vance with some solid info there. Paul Allen, but the votes to get that into the new CBA.
yes but both parties like the clause because players can get paid for two contracts. and owners get a mulligan. if we didn't have paul allen no way we could do this. but with paul going to NY probably. what other team would have the cap room/talent we have to offer? no one...
fuck...well okay but with camby, miller, and pryz gone we should have enough, no?Amnesty does not create cap room it only removes a player's salary for purposes of calculating the luxury tax.
Jury's still out on G.O. and B-Roy
Amnesty does not create cap room it only removes a player's salary for purposes of calculating the luxury tax.
fuck...well okay but with camby, miller, and pryz gone we should have enough, no?
