- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 126,430
- Likes
- 146,859
- Points
- 115
Check your PMS? How is that not misogynism?
Private Messages.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Check your PMS? How is that not misogynism?
No we do not - maybe you do, but I certainly am tired of the constant trolling. It makes me much less interested in spending time in these threads that get hijacked by idiots.
Nice for you to pretend to speak for the majority. If you're tired of the trolling, be mentally strong enough to ignore it.
I think some of the most vocally outspoken against banning should step up to the plate and be mods.
In my defense, I have begged to be a mod for a long time, but Denny just laughed at me.
In my defense, I have begged to be a mod for a long time, but Denny just laughed at me.
Really? We elect mods in the Blazers forum, so it's not really in my control.
If you want to mod another forum on the site, let me know.
You could mod the soccer forum! We'd be besties!![]()
I only like sports
Well, that rules out hockey, too.
See. I think this is extremely funny, and should in no way ever be edited. However, is this allowed? Is it because it's a picture? Is it because he is a mod? Seems like a personal attack. Sly, where are you?
Nope. Nothing else interests me. Well, maybe baseball, hockey or football?
You can be moderator of the Sarah Hecht forum. That doesn't interest you?
It's a bit different. I would assume the majority of people could see the start of playful banter in the exchanges. Sure, it's often a fine line. But most people can tell when you've crossed a line or you're simply pushing it. In the context of the playful banter going back-and-forth, the pic without the words maybe, at most, pushes the line. With the goofy pic, it's pretty clear it's humor. No pic, and maybe adding "whore" or name-calling to the end of the text would probably be over the line, as it probably clouds up the exchange and makes some posters wonder whether it's still playful banter or whether it's starting to get personal.
Ok, I get it. Two people who have posted for years in a forum and never had an issue can't banter (even though smilies were attached), but someone I have never spoken to before can because the picture.
Cmeese was given a 24hr suspension to cool off. Unfortently there is not a suspension designation in the software. Only bans with different lengths of time. The software says he was given a 24hr ban. We call it suspension.
This is already being discussed in 2 other threads but this is what happened, Cmeese first posted that PapaG had sand in his vagina. I deleted the post and politely asked Cmeese to stop via PM. He replied back and pointed out that PapaG insulted him too. I told him I saw that (I had already deleted the insult) but that he still needed to stop with the personal insults. After that he decided to post that PapaG has aids. Nate saw the post, deleted it and gave him a 24hr suspension.
Ok, I get it. Two people who have posted for years in a forum and never had an issue can't banter (even though smilies were attached), but someone I have never spoken to before can because the picture.
Yes. Fully acceptable. Quality rule following by you.
You are a whore= Not ok
At least Papa's insult was amusing and backhanded; those are just egregiously lazy. I think that's the true offense here: if you're going to spar verbally, try to do a little fencing. Don't just bring a sledgehammer to a sword fight.
See, this is why the forum is moderated by people and not bots. Because people (IE me and Sly) can tell when someone is clearly joking and when someone is actually attacking another poster.
If you can't tell the difference, I don't know what to tell you. Didn't you say you weren't going to post here anymore?
I don't care how you tell her, telling a woman to "Check her Pre-Menstrual Syndrome" at all is just plain wrong.Private Messages.
It's apparent after the million times people have tried to explain it to you that you're not going to understand, or you're just going to keep pushing on it. I have nearly as little filter as anyone on this board, but I can still figure out what pushes the line and what crosses it. Some people don't have that ability I suppose.
This board is getting worse and worse. There's as many posts bashing other posters and complaining about the moderation as there are about all other topics combined. It's funny that the people constantly complaining about people being banned and sent away are the ones whose complaining is actually pushing posters away. Irony at its' finest.
I think some of the most vocally outspoken against banning should step up to the plate and be mods.
Thanks, Nate. I think I'll do what I want.
Anyway, you wouldn't want me to be a mod. I'd never ban anyone and answer most complaints via PM with "grow a pair" (testicles or ovaries depending on your sex).
That's cool man. How about I step down, you take over and you mod how you think it should be done. We'll see how it works out and revisit this discussion in 6-8 months. Deal?