Politics AOC At It Again....

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
calvin natt said:
One of my favorite Seinfeld episodes is when George Constanta realizes he needs to do or think the exact opposite of everything his instinct tells him. For some reason this reminds me of you. Like it’s almost if you intentionally write the opposite of what’s true. It’s not like “well that’s a different opinion, ok”. It’s “that is literally the opposite of truth”. This is why I think you are a well designed robot that has been planted here to keep the place going.
Click to expand...
That’s a great episode. I’ve got some friends who should probably take that approach for their love lives. Heh. :)
 
MARIS61 said:
1. What color do you think she is?

2. Nobody in the GOP feels threatened by her. She's the priceless gift that keeps on giving. Pretty sure her emergence has caused several million Dems to consider switching parties before 2020.
Click to expand...
1. It's a scenario that is offered and not a fact;
2. Pretty sure she's attracted Millions of voters both Democratic and other.
 
Lanny said:
If you met him in person you'd be compelled to call him classy regardless of his politics.
Click to expand...
I always liked wook….first time he's insulted me here. AOC is just a young first term freshman and right wingers are stirring up McCarthyistic "find the commie" rhetoric that I think is pretty shallow.
 
Last edited:
riverman said:
really? linked insults? Classy Wook
Click to expand...

riverman said:
first time someone has linked an insult at me here.
Click to expand...

Gee river, it seems just too far. I can't see why you took a personal offense to Wook's post.
I think AOC is sort of and interesting young woman, but I also think it weird as hell that she actually managed to get people to want her to represent them. Really Strange!

Now you might ask, what do I really think? OK, I think she is dumber that a box of rocks, but look! Holy hell, she has all the current Candidates on the Dem side supporting her
Green New deal, pulled straight out of the workings of the wisdom of a rock.

Of course on the, other hand, dumber than a box of rock sit well on other dems also, like the current leader of the Dems, Nancy Box of Rocks.

But take no offense please, I would not ever intend to offend you.
 
MarAzul said:
Gee river, it seems just too far. I can't see why you took a personal offense to Wook's post.
I think AOC is sort of and interesting young woman, but I also think it weird as hell that she actually managed to get people to want her to represent them. Really Strange!

Now you might ask, what do I really think? OK, I think she is dumber that a box of rocks, but look! Holy hell, she has all the current Candidates on the Dem side supporting her
Green New deal, pulled straight out of the workings of the wisdom of a rock.

Of course on the, other hand, dumber than a box of rock sit well on other dems also, like the current leader of the Dems, Nancy Box of Rocks.

But take no offense please, I would not ever intend to offend you.
Click to expand...
This is the way to discuss the OP.....I disagree about your take on intelligence of both those women but at least you made it about them....nothing personal in your post. I'm glad Trump supporters think Pelosi is dumb.....because she's actually very, very smart whether you agree or not.....hope Trump takes her for granted....Trump calls these women "savages"...says a lot about his character....everything I've heard from AOC has come from the right wings insults at her ...she's not getting her policy into law with the current Congress....she's just planting seeds
 
riverman said:
Trump calls these women "savages"
Click to expand...

Perhaps you don't like the savage part. Well Box of Rock is just a little more on target when speaking of people that ignore our system of selecting a leader under our Constitution.

We just experienced a time when the opposition candidate, in 2016 was investigated by the in-power administration for the first time in our history.
Now as we enter a Presidential election year, we have the house majority leaders in the House, talking impeachment instead of defeating the President at the ballot box.
Impeachment without any clear evidence of a crime. Impeachment as an alternative to defeating the person in the election. That certainly is ignoring our rule of law,
our national tradition, totally void of any respect for due process under our Constitution.

However, they may not be quite as dumb as a box of rock, not real smart, but devious. They likely know they can not win against the indomitable Trump, so they hatch the
low life plan of replacing the election with impeachment. We have never seen this before, it is setting a new standard in decorum. A new point in history.

I suspect it shall fail, if not, then we all deserve the leadership, you can expect from a box of Rocks.
 
Last edited:
MarAzul said:
Gee river, it seems just too far. I can't see why you took a personal offense to Wook's post.
I think AOC is sort of and interesting young woman, but I also think it weird as hell that she actually managed to get people to want her to represent them. Really Strange!

Now you might ask, what do I really think? OK, I think she is dumber that a box of rocks, but look! Holy hell, she has all the current Candidates on the Dem side supporting her
Green New deal, pulled straight out of the workings of the wisdom of a rock.

Of course on the, other hand, dumber than a box of rock sit well on other dems also, like the current leader of the Dems, Nancy Box of Rocks.

But take no offense please, I would not ever intend to offend you.
Click to expand...

hypocritical to say the least. Trump is smart?
 
If you think AOC and Pelosi are “dumber than a box of rocks” yet think your guy Trump isn’t...you are worse than all three.
 
calvin natt said:
If you think AOC and Pelosi are “dumber than a box of rocks” yet think your guy Trump isn’t...you are worse than all three.
Click to expand...

I have no idea where I rank in comparison to the others. But you are welcome to give it a go if it amuses you.
 
MarAzul said:
Perhaps you don't like the savage part.
Click to expand...
There's a lot more of that that I don't like...not a fan of his "shithole countries" or name calling period...guy is a real tool as far as I'm concerned and my opinion of him is based on his own conduct..not my need to insult him. How can you still stand behind this cream puff blowhard is beyond me Marz….he's about as mature as a second grader who's raised on sugar
 
riverman said:
How can you still stand behind
Click to expand...

Actually, nothing I posted has to do with standing behind President Trump. It has to do with the behavior of the dem Leaders making a mockery of our Presidential election system and process as defined in the Constitution.
I see nothing good in their despicable disregard for the allowing the electorate, State by State determine whom leads this nation.

However, just to be clear, I see no reason to change my vote. I will as of right now cast another, for Mr. Trump.
 
Last edited:
MarAzul said:
Actually, nothing I posted has to do with standing behind President Trump. It has to do with the behavior of the dem Leaders making a mockery of our Presidential election system and process as defined in the Constitution.
I see nothing good in their despicable disregard for the allowing the electorate, State by State determine whom leads this nation.

However, just to be clear, I see no reason to change my vote. I will as of right now cast another, for Mr. Trump.
Click to expand...
See Alexander Hamilton's writing about impeachment concerning foreign lobbying for political gain.....Trump threw the constitution in the toilet Marz….fact...you should know this if you truly follow the Constitution. This is no longer up for debate...he admitted it..and thinks he can lie his way out of this one. As I said....I'll insult Trump because he's insulted everyone...
 
riverman said:
See Alexander Hamilton's writing about impeachment
Click to expand...

Outstanding suggestion riverman my man!
He is the foremost author and source of original intent on the subject. I have read his papers several times. I suggest all do the same. After doing so, I think any person would have to agree, the process now being deployed, ain't even close.
The high crime is missing. When it comes to nullifying the Presidential election by impeachment, the only due process then becomes those that call for impeachment must answer for their actions to the people that sent them to represent them.
The current mob running the House does not call for impeachment, thereby placing each member on record for their deed. They intent to stall, and delay, expound much but follow no process that Mr Hamilton would possible recognize.
Designed only to make a mockery of a Presidential election. No doubt because they have only losers in-place of contenders in the upcoming process.

They are modern charlatans making a shame of our Republic and our rule of law once cherished by all.
 
MarAzul said:
Outstanding suggestion riverman my man!
He is the foremost author and source of original intent on the subject. I have read his papers several times. I suggest all do the same. After doing so, I think any person would have to agree, the process now being deployed, ain't even close.
The high crime is missing. When it comes to nullifying the Presidential election by impeachment, the only due process then becomes those that call for impeachment must answer for their actions to the people that sent them to represent them.
The current mob running the House does not call for impeachment, thereby placing each member on record for their deed. They intent to stall, and delay, expound much but follow no process that Mr Hamilton would possible recognize.
Designed only to make a mockery of a Presidential election. No doubt because they have only losers in-place of contenders in the upcoming process.

They are modern charlatans making a shame of our Republic and our rule of law once cherished by all.
Click to expand...
I linked an article about Hamilton and the description of the impeachment process concerning foreign lobbies.....it's on your Joe Biden's son is a drug addict thread.
 
MarAzul said:
They intent to stall, and delay,
Click to expand...
This isn't true Marz….Pelosi didn't want to go into impeachment mode this close to an election...she's said that repeatedly...the seriousness of this last blunder by Trump is forcing their hand. Trump has broken the law...impeachment is risky for any party in an election year...they know this. It's not just Dems who are outraged.....44 fired cabinet members ...all republicans are outraged...Mueller is a republican. You can draw a line in the sand but the surf will just wash that away.
 
riverman said:
This isn't true Marz
Click to expand...

It is true.
Not one member is officially on record to proceed or not. Therefore none are accountable to their electorate.
The Presidential election is now sort of a one sided deal, as the Dems are now just throwing rocks in the gears. Biden is toast and the Dems can field nothing but near communist as an alternative.

Their only answer is to fain impeachment, that even they know can not be done. Dishonorable doesn't even describe the low life they are.
 
MarAzul said:
It is true.
Not one member is officially on record to proceed or not. Therefore none are accountable to their electorate.
The Presidential election is now sort of a one sided deal, as the Dems are now just throwing rocks in the gears. Biden is toast and the Dems can field nothing but near communist as an alternative.

Their only answer is to fain impeachment, that even they know can not be done. Dishonorable doesn't even describe the low life they are.
Click to expand...
They got you scared it seems......the election has always been a two sided deal which I have issue with...can you name any non dem or republican candidate? I had to look them up..they're not in the news or on tv in a debate.
 
riverman said:
They got you scared it seems
Click to expand...
Disgusted would be closer to the mark.

"can you name any non dem or republican candidate?"
No, other than Trump, No. Can't name a Dem that has a chance in hell. Neither can the Dems, that is why we are hearing Impeachment, like a cult cry from the leadership.

Holy hell man! Can you imagine how bad it is, when Pocahontas bubbles to the top again? Geez man, everyone thought she was flushed down the drain with the DNA.

But, Some weird stuff is happening, hard to believe but everyday now, we see a bit of Hillary. Like it might be close to Resurrection day. If the House can't stave off a vote on impeachment proceedings, which would likely fail, they do need something new to talk about.

Ha! How rich that would be, Hillary is the new!:blush:
 
MarAzul said:
Disgusted would be closer to the mark.

"can you name any non dem or republican candidate?"
No, other than Trump, No. Can't name a Dem that has a chance in hell. Neither can the Dems, that is why we are hearing Impeachment, like a cult cry from the leadership.

Holy hell man! Can you imagine how bad it is, when Pocahontas bubbles to the top again? Geez man, everyone thought she was flushed down the drain with the DNA.

But, Some weird stuff is happening, hard to believe but everyday now, we see a bit of Hillary. Like it might be close to Resurrection day. If the House can't stave off a vote on impeachment proceedings, which would likely fail, they do need something new to talk about.

Ha! How rich that would be, Hillary is the new!:blush:
Click to expand...

can’t wait. It’s going to make guys like you so mad, when Pocahontas beats the shit out of your lord and savior. It’ll be so nice to have a coherent, well spoken and stable human in the Oval Office. It’ll be strange but we’ll get used to it. When you are finally able to end this whole charade. You won’t have to dig your heels in and defend this pile of shit, I have to believe you’re better than that. Although the more time that goes by, it’s becoming less likely. It is awfully embarrassing to ride-or-die with Trump and Moscow Mitch, but I guess when you are by yourself on a boat who cares?
 
riverman said:
.can you name any non dem or republican candidate?
Click to expand...

calvin natt said:
It’ll be so nice to have a coherent, well spoken and stable human
Click to expand...
Right, a woman of color whom, thinks the world will end in twelve years. Well now, if it going to end in 12 years, why the hell does anyone need their college tuition to be free!
Indeed, why the hell do you need medicare? Shit, you ought to try that before you want it.

Oh by the way, life on the MarAzul is quite nice, thank you.

Hadleys Landing 10-18.jpg
 
MarAzul said:
Right, a woman of color whom, thinks the world will end in twelve years. Well now, if it going to end in 12 years, why the hell does anyone need their college tuition to be free!
Indeed, why the hell do you need medicare? Shit, you ought to try that before you want it.

Oh by the way, life on the MarAzul is quite nice, thank you.

View attachment 27688
Click to expand...
You said Pocahontas. That’s Warren. That’s who I’m talking about.
 
calvin natt said:
You are an embarrassment.
Click to expand...

Well don't hold your breath, I will not be issuing and apology. Never fucking lied to Harvard or any where else either. How the fuck do you apologizes for being such a low life scam artist anyway?
Harvard needs a woman of color. Ta ta here I am, EW. Geez!

I never tried Harvard. But I did get to MIT for a bit. It was simply, highest scores for the gig of 11000plus candidates. No apology needed. It is right in the same neighborhood you know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top