Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, boring. Antiseptic. Lacks soul. Lacks originality. Lacks feeling. It's so of its time - it's going to be easy to date this logo in the future, just like it's easy to date all the re-brands that took place in the 90s.Really? You think it's boring? I hate the pups but I really like that logo.
Ha - I didn't even remember they already had an updated logo. I was thinking of this, which is TRULY awful:Yuck! That's just a minor variation of the alternate logo they've been using since 2008, but worse in every way:
![]()
I'm fine with mirror imaging the wolf's head, but the use of green in the eye and the star is nauseating. Also what happened to the fucking trees? They are the Minnesota Timberwolves for fuck's sake. They should have just rotated it by 180 degrees, added the Minnesota Timberwolves text around the perimeter and called it done.
If they REALLY wanted to have the green color, make the trees green, because, well trees are actually green:
![]()
I'm fine with the sleeker wolf's head, but I think they should have kept the trees instead of adding the star. They're the Minnesota Timberwolves, not the Minnesota North Stars.
BNM
Yuck! That's just a minor variation of the alternate logo they've been using since 2008, but worse in every way:
![]()
I'm fine with mirror imaging the wolf's head, but the use of green in the eye and the star is nauseating. Also what happened to the fucking trees? They are the Minnesota Timberwolves for fuck's sake. They should have just rotated it by 180 degrees, added the Minnesota Timberwolves text around the perimeter and called it done.
If they REALLY wanted to have the green color, make the trees green, because, well trees are actually green:
![]()
I'm fine with the sleeker wolf's head, but I think they should have kept the trees instead of adding the star. They're the Minnesota Timberwolves, not the Minnesota North Stars.
BNM
Ha - I didn't even remember they already had an updated logo. I was thinking of this, which is TRULY awful:
![]()
![]()
It isn't tough looking, but I miss the early 90s logo.
I guess 80s bleed into 90s - I thought this was from the 80s, and the hideous one I posted was 90s. But I suppose this could be early 90s and the other late 90s? Either way, this one SLAYS all the more modern designs. I hate "mean, tough, extreme" logos - the only thing worse are the Clippers and Thunder "logos", if they can even be called that.![]()
It isn't tough looking, but I miss the early 90s logo.
I guess 80s bleed into 90s - I thought this was from the 80s, and the hideous one I posted was 90s. But I suppose this could be early 90s and the other late 90s? Either way, this one SLAYS all the more modern designs. I hate "mean, tough, extreme" logos - the only thing worse are the Clippers and Thunder "logos", if they can even be called that.
Good >> AWFUL >> Still AWFUL, but at least the typeface isn't quite as awful.
Signing Tavares is a solid move for them. I wish Portland would have had the room to do so.Sounds like Larry Sanders is really impressing teams......
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...ers-plan-waive-larry-sanders-sign-edy-tavares
Kings had 8 players in double figures including 30 points from Buddy Hield in a win tonight. I think their future is bright now tha Cousins is gone. Not sure how things will work out in New Orleans.
Hield should be ROYKings had 8 players in double figures including 30 points from Buddy Hield in a win tonight. I think their future is bright now tha Cousins is gone. Not sure how things will work out in New Orleans.
You might be right.Hield should be ROY
Just about Nurks averagesPlums with a decent game tonight, 16/9 with 4 TO's.
Remember when people were trashing the Kings for the Boogie trade?Hield should be ROY
