TorturedBlazerFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2018
- Messages
- 19,824
- Likes
- 23,357
- Points
- 113
Who else on Boston can create there own shot the way Kyrie can?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LeBron has won his last 5 Game 7s
I understand why people feel that way, but I think Lebron has a better chance to beat Houston or GS (Not that either team have a great shot).
Are Kyrie and Hayward really their two best players? I'd rather have Tatum and Brown and Horford.
I'd take Horford over Hayward, but they're two of the top 3, yes.Yes they are. If Boston had a healthy Irving and Hayward, cavs would already be out.
Kyrie is about as good as Dame. Kyrie is definitely better than those guys. C'mon now.Are Kyrie and Hayward really their two best players? I'd rather have Tatum and Brown and Horford.
Tatum isn't a normal rookie..Again this series has gone as I predicted after game one. I hope I am wrong in game 7, but I will not bet against LBJ in game 7. Not when Boston relies on a rookie in clutch situations.
It's funny how people say they're not gonna bet against LeBron even though this is his worst team since he first left Cleveland.. meanwhile people have consistently bet against Boston and been proven wrong.
LeBron has won his last 5 Game 7s
Nope. Game 7 win at GS in 2016 NBA finals.All of them at home though right?
Too Funny!Westbrook is somewhere laughing at Lebron not getting the triple double.
I actually picked Boston in 6. But that was before I realized they weren’t going to show up on the road.It's funny how people say they're not gonna bet against LeBron even though this is his worst team since he first left Cleveland.. meanwhile people have consistently bet against Boston and been proven wrong.
I was joking but can't help but think if Russ saw the boxscore that he didn't at least think it for a second.Too Funny!
I actually picked Boston in 6. But that was before I realized they weren’t going to show up on the road.
So it’s not like I don’t respect what Boston has done this year, I just think while it’s not impossible that Lebron loses, I believe he’s going to be awesome and he really just needs either one other guy to have a “good” game or a few of them to be average.
"The OKC Warriors"
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2777976
Speaking of Hayward..... down here working our last track event before they tear this historic facility down. 99 years.......I have more respect for Boston than for all other three teams left in the playoffs combined. To get this deep in the playoffs without two of their stars, with a 7-8 man rotation, with such adversity, is very impressive. When Hayward broke his leg at the beginning of the season. I counted them out, but they have played an amazing brand of basketball. I hope the Blazers are watching. The Celtics are the team the Blazers should take note of, not the raptors.
You are working the Pre? Awesome event with world class talent. I will be working with one of the contractors building the new stadium and a couple of the other buildings. Expect an awesome new stadium.Speaking of Hayward..... down here working our last track event before they tear this historic facility down. 99 years.......
View attachment 20829
I understand why people feel that way, but I think Lebron has a better chance to beat Houston or GS (Not that either team have a great shot).
I wouldn’t say I’m a Lebron fan, for one he’s not a Blazer and I am a Blazer fan. I’ve never hated Lebron but his career arc has been fun to see. Young Lebron was just an amazing Athlete, he was a good basketball player, but I think a lot of people looked at him and thought well if I had hit the Genetic lottery I could do what he does. As Lebron has aged and matured though he’s mixed that incredible athleticism with constantly becoming a better and better basketball player.I don't. I don't understand LeBron haters at all.
We don't even know if Hayward fits with this team. Would they be better with him taking Brown and Tatum's minutes? And maybe they're better defensively without Kyrie. They played a lot of their season without either. So it's not like they were the Rockets and then lost Paul and Harden. Boston had a winning identity without their "stars."I have more respect for Boston than for all other three teams left in the playoffs combined. To get this deep in the playoffs without two of their stars, with a 7-8 man rotation, with such adversity, is very impressive. When Hayward broke his leg at the beginning of the season. I counted them out, but they have played an amazing brand of basketball. I hope the Blazers are watching. The Celtics are the team the Blazers should take note of, not the raptors.
More Nance might be a good thing for this matchup. We'll see.OK this changes things. When I chose the Cavs to win game 7 I was banking on a solid game from Love.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/23613755/kevin-love-cleveland-cavaliers-game-7
Lol. You're overthinking this. They're stars. Stars make teams better. Some people think certain guys are stars, but they aren't, because they don't actually make their team better, like Melo. Kyrie amd Hayward do.We don't even know if Hayward fits with this team. Would they be better with him taking Brown and Tatum's minutes? And maybe they're better defensively without Kyrie. They played a lot of their season without either. So it's not like they were the Rockets and then lost Paul and Harden. Boston had a winning identity without their "stars."
Well.. The article says they play better without Love on the court.OK this changes things. When I chose the Cavs to win game 7 I was banking on a solid game from Love.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/23613755/kevin-love-cleveland-cavaliers-game-7
Lol. You're overthinking this. They're stars. Stars make teams better. Some people think certain guys are stars, but they aren't, because they don't actually make their team better, like Melo. Kyrie amd Hayward do.