Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We took big swings at #3 and last year #7. This late in the draft all you need are players who can be in an 8 man rotation and the picks will be a huge success.OK. An underwhelming pick, but I am cool with it. Hopefully we take a big swing at #43.
Our groupthink mock had him going #19 to Golden State, so OBVIOUSLY the Blazers got a steal at #23ESPN last mock had us picking Murry

Rumor is they were shopping this pick for veterans. Guess they couldn’t find one so they picked someone that can seemingly contribute right away.I'd wonder how likely it is that Portland keeps this pick
I don't agree as a general proposition. That's how you get Dante Cunningham and Jeff Pendergraph in the same draft (upperclassmen who never showed hope of being starting-level NBA guys) ... in this case, though, given (as you noted) we'd already gone young with an earlier pick, going safer makes more sense.We took big swings at #3 and last year #7. This late in the draft all you need are players who can be in an 8 man rotation and the picks will be a huge success.
Actually, Scoot had one of the worst defensive ratings in all of the g-league at 122.Both our draft picks can play defense and that's one thing that we needed.
Keegan is better and *way* more athletic, which is saying a lot, because Keegan isn’t exactly a stellar athleteWhat's the difference between Keegan and Kris? It seems like his twin is a road map.
I think you’ll be disappointed if you think these guys are defender…Both our draft picks can play defense and that's one thing that we needed. Murray can come right in and get minutes right off from the bench.
What's the difference between Keegan and Kris? It seems like his twin is a road map.
I mean... it makes sense. An older guy who can potentially be plugged into the rotation at the 3. It reduces our need to keep Knox/Reddish/Thybulle, but it doesn't address our need for size and I don't see a lot of upside.
Neither of those guys were 8 man rotation players, they were scrubs.I don't agree as a general proposition. That's how you get Dante Cunningham and Jeff Pendergraph in the same draft (upperclassmen who never showed hope of being starting-level NBA guys) ... in this case, though, given (as you noted) we'd already gone young with an earlier pick, going safer makes more sense.
Hopefully we go for upside at #43.
Keegan:Stats wise at Iowa........Kris looks to have better stats



They were drafted as four year seniors, thinking they would be mature players that could slide right into the rotation, just like Murray. They were drafted in spite of their lack of upside because they were considered "safe".Neither of those guys were 8 man rotation players, they were scrubs.
We don't need a star this late, a 5th starter or 6/7th man is fine. Will Murray be that? Maybe or maybe not. I'd think Schmidtz has a reason for drafting him over the upside of Miller though.
Neither of those guys were 8 man rotation players, they were scrubs.
We don't need a star this late, a 5th starter or 6/7th man is fine. Will Murray be that? Maybe or maybe not. I'd think Schmidtz has a reason for drafting him over the upside of Miller though.
Keegan:
View attachment 56280
Kris:
View attachment 56281
Note even close when they were on the same team. Kris played about half as much and was lower on everything other than, like, personal fouls.
Of course, Kris had a very good junior year after Keegan left:
View attachment 56282
Which, I think, demonstrates how much an extra year of maturity can help a player. But his junior year still looks like it was worse than Keegan's sophomore year (look at the FG%, the 3pt%... actually across the board he wasn't as good).
Trust in Schmitz
I was just looking at their last year at Iowa....when each of them was the go-to guy.
Trust in Schmitz
This is not a Schmitz pick.
Yeah but why? Is one twin really that more athletic than the other?pick 23 vs pick 4
