Politics Bad signs for the Republican Party

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

Good God....who in here wants Hillary to run again or Bernie to take us to the next level?
Be counted...
 
Good God....who in here wants Hillary to run again or Bernie to take us to the next level?
Be counted...

Those aren't the only choices, you know.

barfo
 
I'd rather have a libertarian businessman than a Democrat or Republican politician.
I voted for Gary Johnson last election....I'm done with the Hatfields and McCoys divorce court masquerading as govt..against Trump I'd vote for Pee Wee Herman or Stormy Daniels before I'd vote for him
 
I voted for Gary Johnson last election....I'm done with the Hatfields and McCoys divorce court masquerading as govt..against Trump I'd vote for Pee Wee Herman or Stormy Daniels before I'd vote for him
Non of the far left or right politicians could out manage a results oriented, shake it up, small gov, more business person. Just my opinion.
 
Non of the far left or right politicians could out manage a results oriented, shake it up, small gov, more business person. Just my opinion.

Well, that's me. I'm a businessman, so maybe we should elect me. I've got every bit as much relevant experience as the current occupant, and I believe I could do just as good a job.

I'd be fucking awful, in other words.

I don't understand why people think that success in business predicts success in government. Nobody says "The next Pope should be a businessman" or "My heart surgeon should be a businessman" or "Great sculpture is most likely to be produced by businessmen".

Similarly, no business says "For our next CEO, we should hire someone from government, or maybe a surgeon, or an artist. Just as long as they have no experience at all running a company, or even working for one, it'll be great".

barfo
 
Well, that's me. I'm a businessman, so maybe we should elect me. I've got every bit as much relevant experience as the current occupant, and I believe I could do just as good a job.

I'd be fucking awful, in other words.

I don't understand why people think that success in business predicts success in government. Nobody says "The next Pope should be a businessman" or "My heart surgeon should be a businessman" or "Great sculpture is most likely to be produced by businessmen".

Similarly, no business says "For our next CEO, we should hire someone from government, or maybe a surgeon, or an artist. Just as long as they have no experience at all running a company, or even working for one, it'll be great".

barfo

Agree.
Electing actors as politicians, and hiring actors as NBA gms has worked out much better.

We are so screwed.
 
Well, that's me. I'm a businessman, so maybe we should elect me. I've got every bit as much relevant experience as the current occupant...
barfo

Not even close.

He's got over 1/4th of a term behind him. :cheers:
 
31403942_417218808750085_3137510928698834944_n.jpg
 
I don't understand why people think that success in business predicts success in government.
barfo

Because our Constitution spells out quite clearly that our Government is only meant to be a Small Business that provides Limited Services to US.
 
Well, that's me. I'm a businessman, so maybe we should elect me. I've got every bit as much relevant experience as the current occupant, and I believe I could do just as good a job.

I'd be fucking awful, in other words.

I don't understand why people think that success in business predicts success in government. Nobody says "The next Pope should be a businessman" or "My heart surgeon should be a businessman" or "Great sculpture is most likely to be produced by businessmen".

Similarly, no business says "For our next CEO, we should hire someone from government, or maybe a surgeon, or an artist. Just as long as they have no experience at all running a company, or even working for one, it'll be great".

barfo

I respect your opinion and if you are a successful business guy that can manage & empower people, meet objectives through solid improvement goals, based on objective measurable goals, results oriented and profitable, well organized and can deli-cate/deli-dump, can manage and act proactively in area's that are out of control, have good energy and back bone to compete in a competitive arena that's ruthless, support our troops & vets, and believe in the constitution, then I'd vote you in a nano second over a schooled politician that only wants to be beholden to lobbyist and serve government for the purpose of growing government and tax more, and car out a nice life time career selling bullshit to those in need by convincing them that socialism is your ticket and way out. And who could care less about the constitution and really what government service is all about.
The Greek way of learning is to, learn, learn , learn and get around to doing nothing.
The Hebrew way is to, learn learn learn by doing at the same time.
 
I respect your opinion and if you are a successful business guy that can manage & empower people, meet objectives through solid improvement goals, based on objective measurable goals, results oriented and profitable, well organized and can deli-cate/deli-dump, can manage and act proactively in area's that are out of control, have good energy and back bone to compete in a competitive arena that's ruthless, support our troops & vets, and believe in the constitution, then I'd vote you in a nano second over a schooled politician that only wants to be beholden to lobbyist and serve government for the purpose of growing government and tax more, and car out a nice life time career selling bullshit to those in need by convincing them that socialism is your ticket and way out. And who could care less about the constitution and really what government service is all about.
The Greek way of learning is to, learn, learn , learn and get around to doing nothing.
The Hebrew way is to, learn learn learn by doing at the same time.
My company in Seattle hired an ex high ranking military officer. We lost a big bid and he got fired shortly thereafter. Ex government people are often hired by big business to give the company the inside scoop on who and how to deal with.
 
My company in Seattle hired an ex high ranking military officer. We lost a big bid and he got fired shortly thereafter. Ex government people are often hired by big business to give the company the inside scoop on who and how to deal with.
All the OR/WA Sate agencies/Purchasing Agents I dealt with over the years always told me if they don't spend their budgetary allotment for their fiscal year, they won't get it an increase for the next year. I used to give them a bad time about mis-managing tax payers dollars. In fact most agencies had large surpluses of equipment purchased still in crates and warehoused from years back.
Not sure you ever had to meet a government spec on a bid, lord have mercy. Some State or Fed engineer (lol) was trying to justify their existence by writing specs that no one could meet!
Yep, If I got a purchase order from them for several pieces of equipment, I always felt guilty as Al Capone knowing that its very possible they were stock piling their surplus.
Lanny, you got to agree that large government can get out of control? When they are not accountable or audited for efficiency and performance like the private sector, it's a free ticket for them at tax payers expense.
 
All the OR/WA Sate agencies/Purchasing Agents I dealt with over the years always told me if they don't spend their budgetary allotment for their fiscal year, they won't get it an increase for the next year. I used to give them a bad time about mis-managing tax payers dollars. In fact most agencies had large surpluses of equipment purchased still in crates and warehoused from years back.
Not sure you ever had to meet a government spec on a bid, lord have mercy. Some State or Fed engineer (lol) was trying to justify their existence by writing specs that no one could meet!
Yep, If I got a purchase order from them for several pieces of equipment, I always felt guilty as Al Capone knowing that its very possible they were stock piling their surplus.
Lanny, you got to agree that large government can get out of control? When they are not accountable or audited for efficiency and performance like the private sector, it's a free ticket for them at tax payers expense.
One reason Im a libertarian is Im a believer on being fiscally responsible.
 
Well, that's me. I'm a businessman, so maybe we should elect me. I've got every bit as much relevant experience as the current occupant, and I believe I could do just as good a job.

I'd be fucking awful, in other words.

I don't understand why people think that success in business predicts success in government. Nobody says "The next Pope should be a businessman" or "My heart surgeon should be a businessman" or "Great sculpture is most likely to be produced by businessmen".

Similarly, no business says "For our next CEO, we should hire someone from government, or maybe a surgeon, or an artist. Just as long as they have no experience at all running a company, or even working for one, it'll be great".

barfo

This.

The skills needed to run a business are not the same as the skills needed to run a government. And the goals of a business, to maximize profit, are very different than what a government is supposed to do.

For example, just look at California. Schwarzenegger drove it into a ditch. It took Jerry Brown, a career politician who understood how to pull the reins of government, to fix the state.

This is also why term limits is a horrible idea. You need institutional memory and skills sets.
 
All the OR/WA Sate agencies/Purchasing Agents I dealt with over the years always told me if they don't spend their budgetary allotment for their fiscal year, they won't get it an increase for the next year. I used to give them a bad time about mis-managing tax payers dollars. In fact most agencies had large surpluses of equipment purchased still in crates and warehoused from years back.
Not sure you ever had to meet a government spec on a bid, lord have mercy. Some State or Fed engineer (lol) was trying to justify their existence by writing specs that no one could meet!
Yep, If I got a purchase order from them for several pieces of equipment, I always felt guilty as Al Capone knowing that its very possible they were stock piling their surplus.
Lanny, you got to agree that large government can get out of control? When they are not accountable or audited for efficiency and performance like the private sector, it's a free ticket for them at tax payers expense.

There is no question but what the sort of thing you describe does happen in government.
However, it also happens in industry. Companies have budgets too, and sometimes managers spend their budgets on stuff they don't really need because they have the money now and they might not later. There's plenty of "waste, fraud and abuse" in the private world.
And governments are audited. If they aren't fully accountable, that's on us voters for not demanding more accountability.
Putting incompetents in charge doesn't add accountability, it removes it.

barfo
 
This.

The skills needed to run a business are not the same as the skills needed to run a government. And the goals of a business, to maximize profit, are very different than what a government is supposed to do.

For example, just look at California. Schwarzenegger drove it into a ditch. It took Jerry Brown, a career politician who understood how to pull the reins of government, to fix the state.

This is also why term limits is a horrible idea. You need institutional memory and skills sets.

So you think Jerry Brown “fixed” California? Interesting.
 
Dems shitting the bed in Cali.

#BlueWaveOver
 
One reason Im a libertarian is Im a believer on being fiscally responsible.
I've dealt with plenty of government purchases and yes, they are expensive. However, most people don't realize what's involved with meeting the specs or why they even have such strict specs.
1. Strict Specifications - You have to have these because you don't want components or assemblies failing at critical times in critical situations. My dealings were mostly with the military but also with NASA and required over and above reliability;

2. Specs must be maintained. Again, almost all my specs involved some sort of drawing. Drawings get updated periodically for numerous reasons including increased reliability, increased producibility and improved performance. These updates are done by a qualified engineer and approved at a change board. These actions are not cheap nor is maintaining the drawing so that it isn't sabotaged by changing it without approval by a change board. By the way, we had to be on the look out for such drawing and/or parts sabotage on the Peacekeeper (aka MX) missile, principlally by the Russians. Yes, I had a security clearance. The clearance also adds to the cost of having an engineer do everything.

So, the next time you see a pilot use an on board toilet, you should know that the seat won't suddenly break and incapacitate the pilot or some other necessary crewman.

I might also point out that fasteners are strictly specified so that they don't fail during some critical mission. Yes, nuts, bolts, screws and washers need to be specified for obvious reasons.

I point this out for the benefit of the uniformed reader and not you.
 
I've dealt with plenty of government purchases and yes, they are expensive. However, most people don't realize what's involved with meeting the specs or why they even have such strict specs.
1. Strict Specifications - You have to have these because you don't want components or assemblies failing at critical times in critical situations. My dealings were mostly with the military but also with NASA and required over and above reliability;

2. Specs must be maintained. Again, almost all my specs involved some sort of drawing. Drawings get updated periodically for numerous reasons including increased reliability, increased producibility and improved performance. These updates are done by a qualified engineer and approved at a change board. These actions are not cheap nor is maintaining the drawing so that it isn't sabotaged by changing it without approval by a change board. By the way, we had to be on the look out for such drawing and/or parts sabotage on the Peacekeeper (aka MX) missile, principlally by the Russians. Yes, I had a security clearance. The clearance also adds to the cost of having an engineer do everything.

So, the next time you see a pilot use an on board toilet, you should know that the seat won't suddenly break and incapacitate the pilot or some other necessary crewman.

I might also point out that fasteners are strictly specified so that they don't fail during some critical mission. Yes, nuts, bolts, screws and washers need to be specified for obvious reasons.

I point this out for the benefit of the uniformed reader and not you.

I do software development and some hardware stuff (though that's a whole different branch of engineering) and we deal with the military a ton, this is spot on. Most of our old Tektronic employee's know the drill, but when we get newer people around that have to learn the military specs and all that oh man it's a whole new world for them. The costs are high because the demand on the work is crazy, we're dealing more and more in the space industry and the costs are like 50%+ more than the military too. We had a customer who was literally making us print out certs for every single part we put on their product, and if it didn't have a SN, we had to create serial numbers and a system to track literally everything. It sucked.
 
Back
Top