Bank gets Forclosed

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MrJayremmie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
3,438
Likes
27
Points
48
LOL! This is great! Dumb ass banks.

http://www.digtriad.com/news/waterc...orida-Homeowner-Forecloses-On-Bank-Of-America

Collier County, Florida -- Have you heard the one about a homeowner foreclosing on a bank?

Well, it has happened in Florida and involves a North Carolina based bank.

Instead of Bank of America foreclosing on some Florida homeowner, the homeowners had sheriff's deputies foreclose on the bank.

It started five months ago when Bank of America filed foreclosure papers on the home of a couple, who didn't owe a dime on their home.

The couple said they paid cash for the house.

The case went to court and the homeowners were able to prove they didn't owe Bank of America anything on the house. In fact, it was proven that the couple never even had a mortgage bill to pay.

A Collier County Judge agreed and after the hearing, Bank of America was ordered, by the court to pay the legal fees of the homeowners', Maurenn Nyergers and her husband.

The Judge said the bank wrongfully tried to foreclose on the Nyergers' house.

So, how did it end with bank being foreclosed on? After more than 5 months of the judge's ruling, the bank still hadn't paid the legal fees, and the homeowner's attorney did exactly what the bank tried to do to the homeowners. He seized the bank's assets.

"They've ignored our calls, ignored our letters, legally this is the next step to get my clients compensated, " attorney Todd Allen told CBS.

Sheriff's deputies, movers, and the Nyergers' attorney went to the bank and foreclosed on it. The attorney gave instructions to to remove desks, computers, copiers, filing cabinets and any cash in the teller's drawers.

After about an hour of being locked out of the bank, the bank manager handed the attorney a check for the legal fees.

"As a foreclosure defense attorney this is sweet justice" says Allen.

Allen says this is something that he sees often in court, banks making errors because they didn't investigate the foreclosure and it becomes a lengthy and expensive battle for the homeowner.

Sweet Justice indeed.
 

Very minor sweet justice IMO.

All that seems to have happened is Bank of America tried to forclose on a house illegally.

The case amazingly went to court.

The judge ruled for the homeowner and ordered BofA to pay legal fees.

Bank of America stiffed their bill.

The homeowner's attorney "foreclosed" on the branch (for only 1 hour its reported).

Bank of America pays the bill.

Where is the "justice"? I don't see it.

This is really crapy. If folks don't want BofA trampling over the rights of the little people judges need to pull their heads out their ass and do what use to be done, but you don't see much of lately.

How about criminal charges?

How about a RICO lawsuit for serial perjury?

How about Triple damages?

Seems in this case therewas virtually Zero liability for BofAs actions despite reports in the press that BofA and other banks make mistakes like this all of the time.
 
Very minor sweet justice IMO.

All that seems to have happened is Bank of America tried to forclose on a house illegally.

The case amazingly went to court.

The judge ruled for the homeowner and ordered BofA to pay legal fees.

Bank of America stiffed their bill.

The homeowner's attorney "foreclosed" on the branch (for only 1 hour its reported).

Bank of America pays the bill.

Where is the "justice"? I don't see it.

That is actually exactly what happened.

The justice is that the "little guy" finally gave the bank a taste of its own medicine. The branch owner (or someone like that) they said was "visibly shaken". He should be.

Banks gotta pay their bills also.

I'm not against your belief that the Banks should be held more liable though. It is just nice to see things like this every once in a while.
 
I'd sue B of A for damages, not just to recoup costs.
 
Ever been baselessly sued? As a landlord, it happens to me all the time.

Wow, that would suck. Yet another reason I never want to be a landlord.

barfo
 
Wow... second story like this in a year... interesting.
 
The officials at the bank that started and approved this action should forfeit their homes to the victim.
 
The officials at the bank that started and approved this action should forfeit their homes to the victim.

It seems like this family was well off. I wonder if a poor family, struggling to make it in their home would be able to fight the bank on this.
 
It seems like this family was well off. I wonder if a poor family, struggling to make it in their home would be able to fight the bank on this.

This was a fight over legal fees. The family was pretty much irrelevant. This was lawyer vs. bank action. Hot hot hot!

barfo
 
This was a fight over legal fees. The family was pretty much irrelevant. This was lawyer vs. bank action. Hot hot hot!

Right, but initially it got there because the family sued the bank for wrongful foreclosure.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top