Rumor BarrShootsDownTrumpgate? (1 Viewer)

[calvin natt]

 

[Lanny]

Won't be enough to stop the impending landslide.

 

[calvin natt]

Predicting the future again?

 

[Minstrel]

"Every President tries to suspend elections if they're at risk of losing, stop pretending Trump is the only one who considers that or does that." #bothsides

 

[Lanny]

"Every President tries to suspend elections if they're at risk of losing, stop pretending Trump is the only one who considers that or does that." #bothsides

He's the only President I've ever heard say that. We did have some fears that Nixon would put off an election unConstitutionally back in the late 60s but he wasn't that stupid. Trump is that stupid. I wouldn't trust that son-of-a-bitch as far as I could throw him and he's pretty fat and pretty disabled so that wouldn't be far not even pico nor femto inches. Might as well measure the gravitational effect of Mt. Hood on a climber.

 

[Lanny]

"Every President tries to suspend elections if they're at risk of losing, stop pretending Trump is the only one who considers that or does that." #bothsides

Name one.

 

[Minstrel]

Name one.

You really struggle with sarcasm, Lanny! I was making fun of the point of view that some have, that anything Trump does or the Republicans do, both sides do. That's why the quotation marks and the hashtag.

 

[Lanny]

You really struggle with sarcasm, Lanny! I was making fun of the point of view that some have, that anything Trump does or the Republicans do, both sides do. That's why the quotation marks and the hashtag.

There has to be even a tiny bit more of a hint. Plus, I still don't understand the part about both sides unless you meant both sides and then it makes sense, wrong sense, but I could then make out what you're saying at least.

 

[Orion Bailey]

Actually its mostly one side.

 

[Lanny]

Actually its mostly one side.

I thought we were talking about Presidents trying to suspend elections.

 

[Orion Bailey]

I thought we were talking about Presidents trying to suspend elections.

I thought it was overall about presidential candidates/parties not accepting defeat?

 

[Lanny]

I thought it was overall about presidential candidates/parties not accepting defeat?

No.
Here's the complete post:
Minstrel - ["Every President tries to suspend elections if they're at risk of losing, stop pretending Trump is the only one who considers that or does that." #bothsides]

 

[Orion Bailey]

No.
Here's the complete post:
Minstrel - ["Every President tries to suspend elections if they're at risk of losing, stop pretending Trump is the only one who considers that or does that." #bothsides]

Well considering that's blatantly not true, I took suspending as not admitting defeat.

 

[Lanny]

Well considering that's blatantly not true, I took suspending as not admitting defeat.

I took suspending as suspending but no big deal. Let's move on.

 

[calvin natt]

Sounds like you’ve got your excuses all queued up. Way to be proactive. Have you tried pitching any of these theories to MSNBC? You’ve got 3 years worth of material here.

Is anyone still doubting whether trump will just walk away from office if he loses? He is getting everything lined up to refuse leaving office/losing the election. It’s now a daily talking point that the election is rigged. If he loses, this country is going to be in turmoil that will make the BLM protests look like Sunday school.

 

[riverman]

Is anyone still doubting whether trump will just walk away from office if he loses? He is getting everything lined up to refuse leaving office/losing the election. It’s now a daily talking point that the election is rigged. If he loses, this country is going to be in turmoil that will make the BLM protests look like Sunday school.

I know 5 fired generals and 73 fired NSA reps that will make damned sure that doesn't happen....contrary to his spin, he doesn't have a lot of friends in the armed forces or the pentagon at this point.
He'll be in the bunker like the first major protest at the WH earlier this year...they'll get him easily and escort him out of office...more likely he'll leave in a huff and start a talk show on Fox

 

[calvin natt]

I know 5 fired generals and 73 fired NSA reps that will make damned sure that doesn't happen....contrary to his spin, he doesn't have a lot of friends in the armed forces or the pentagon at this point.
He'll be in the bunker like the first major protest at the WH earlier this year...they'll get him easily and escort him out of office...more likely he'll leave in a huff and start a talk show on Fox

That sounds great but the guy is Teflon don for a reason. While he has enemies he also has a cult following who I truly believe are willing to die for him. He’s already got people saying shit like get your weapons ready. It’ll be mayhem. As far as legally having to leave office, I think there are ways to make it really difficult to get him out and with guys like Barr around, there is no doubt they will make it a huge issue.

 

[riverman]

That sounds great but the guy is Teflon don for a reason. While he has enemies he also has a cult following who I truly believe are willing to die for him. He’s already got people saying shit like get your weapons ready. It’ll be mayhem. As far as legally having to leave office, I think there are ways to make it really difficult to get him out and with guys like Barr around, there is no doubt they will make it a huge issue.

I think he'll get crushed and blabber about the media and do nothing dems and be gone....he's a fake tough guy...it's an act and not a convincing one from my view...he's done this shit since the 70s and still embarrasses himself..I don't buy any of that bluster..it's all lies...every last word of it

 

[THE HCP]

I hope he DOESN’T leave! I would love for him to lose and then hide out in the WH bunker and be forced out. It would be like some sort of movie!!! Bring his ass out in cuffs!

 

[SlyPokerDog]

I hope he DOESN’T leave! I would love for him to lose and then hide out in the WH bunker and be forced out. It would be like some sort of movie!!! Bring his ass out in cuffs!

I think that would start civil unrest in many cities.

 

[barfo]

I think that would start civil unrest in many cities.

There are cities that don't already have it?

barfo

 

[calvin natt]

Preferably a massive heart attack. Then out in cuffs. Unfortunately neither will happen. Sorry not sorry.

 

[calvin natt]

 

[calvin natt]

@jonnyboy thought it was crazy for me to think Trump wouldn’t leave office if he loses. Here we are months later and it’s becoming more and more clear. Trump is creating a potentially disastrous situation with his followers revolting when he loses. What pieces of shit they all are.

 

[illmatic99]

Why does he want to be president so bad?

WTF is he getting out of this? or more important, what is he trying to hide that would get out after he loses?

 

[THE HCP]

God I hope this really happens. Hope he hides out and doesn't leave the WH........The guys with the khakis and tiki torches would be out front protecting their leader......Send in the troops boys!

 

[ehizzy3]

Barr’s DOJ redacted parts of the mueller report without justifiable reason, they must re-release the report by nov 2

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/judge-orders-more-mueller-report-unredacted

A federal judge has ruled that the Justice Department improperly redacted significant portions of the Mueller report and must release those sections by Nov. 2, just one day before the presidential election.

In a 40-page opinion released Wednesday, US District Court Judge Reggie Walton said the agency violated federal law when it redacted sections of the report dealing with, among other things, discussions within the special counsel’s office about whether to charge certain individuals with crimes. Government attorneys had justified their decision to withhold those portions under a section of law known as the deliberative process privilege, or “Exemption 5,” but Walton wrote that it “failed to show that it appropriately withheld information” under that standard.


At the same time, the judge ruled that the government was right to redact much of the Mueller report under separate exemptions that are designed to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations, law enforcement techniques and procedures, and individuals’ privacy.

The ruling and an accompanying order mean the Justice Department will be obliged to unveil at least 15 previously blacked-out pages from volume one of special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, on or before Nov. 2. In addition to charging decisions, those pages appear to involve discussions related to the hack of emails from the Democratic National Committee in early 2016 and the Trump campaign’s interest in those documents when WikiLeaks released them that June.

 

[jonnyboy]

@jonnyboy thought it was crazy for me to think Trump wouldn’t leave office if he loses. Here we are months later and it’s becoming more and more clear. Trump is creating a potentially disastrous situation with his followers revolting when he loses. What pieces of shit they all are.

Wah.

 

[ehizzy3]

“unmasking” probe is done and they don’t even release the report. It’s probably embarrassing due to lack of evidence

time to hit the drawing board for a new scam

The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing, according to people familiar with the matter.

The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department. The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the “unmasking” of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.

The president in recent days has pressed federal law enforcement to move against his political adversaries and complained that a different prosecutor tapped by Barr to investigate the FBI’s 2016 investigation of his campaign will not be issuing any public findings before the election.

Legal analysts feared that Bash’s review was yet another attempt by Trump’s Justice Department to target political opponents of the president. Even if it ultimately produced no results of consequence, legal analysts said, it allowed Trump and other conservatives to say Obama-era officials were under scrutiny, as long as the case stayed active.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-a...aws.com/public/U2Z5BHQNRQI6XADUB2KDVEN7BA.jpg

https://www.washingtonpost.com/

 

[calvin natt]

I don’t think Trump will leave the office next January. Either the election will be rigged, he will win, or they’ll protest or some other shit. He won’t just go away. There is no chance. If he loses the election they’ll make something up that it’s fake results. It’ll be something.

Sounds like you’ve got your excuses all queued up. Way to be proactive. Have you tried pitching any of these theories to MSNBC? You’ve got 3 years worth of material here.

I was way off base I guess Jboy. This is from May.