Mediocre Man
Mr. SportsTwo
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 44,937
- Likes
- 27,807
- Points
- 113
Sorry. Just turned 24
Learn the age, then post
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry. Just turned 24
Nic's 5th year is a player option.I'd probably ultimately rather have Parsons for 4/94 than Batum for 5/120. Parsons is the better scorer/shooter (defense is more of a wash and Batum is a better playmaker) and both are injury-prone and hard to rely on at the end of a long season.
Batum is staying because they are going to give him a 5y max and he will make a bajillion dollars.
So. He re-signed for way below his max with a small-market team. Huh.
So they can bring in someone else as well? No idea, just guessingHe could have easily gotten the max from Charlotte or another team. Any theories as to why he signed for less than his market value?
So they can bring in someone else as well? No idea, just guessing
How?This makes the Nic trade even worse than it was to begin with.
I doubt Nic was cash strapped before we traded him...he's made a fortune in his career...and we wonder if 120 mil is not enough?How many times has that happened in NBA history? And it has been a superstar who didn't need the money. This is Batum's big payday (which is why we assumed he'd dump us if we didn't pay up so we traded him, and now he doesn't cash in).
One of the main reasons people thought it was a good idea to dump Nic was because he was going to leave us for TOR. Clearly he showed that not only was that not on his mind. Also, he's no more expensive than Parsons.How?
Us does not equal Charlotte.One of the main reasons people thought it was a good idea to dump Nic was because he was going to leave us for TOR. Clearly he showed that not only was that not on his mind. Also, he's no more expensive than Parsons.
That was a BAD trade.
And keeping batum meant 0% chance lma would have considered resigning here.Us does not equal Charlotte.
Nic was ready for a change. I think we would have had a 50/50 chance at best to keep him.
I wouldn't want to pay him 24 million a year. He drove me crazy with his inconsistent bullshit.One of the main reasons people thought it was a good idea to dump Nic was because he was going to leave us for TOR. Clearly he showed that not only was that not on his mind. Also, he's no more expensive than Parsons.
That was a BAD trade.
Defense a wash? Are you kidding?I'd probably ultimately rather have Parsons for 4/94 than Batum for 5/120. Parsons is the better scorer/shooter (defense is more of a wash and Batum is a better playmaker) and both are injury-prone and hard to rely on at the end of a long season.
Only if Nic > Chandler + NoahOne of the main reasons people thought it was a good idea to dump Nic was because he was going to leave us for TOR. Clearly he showed that not only was that not on his mind. Also, he's no more expensive than Parsons.
That was a BAD trade.
You were saying?Only if Nic > Chandler + Noah
Don't rub salt, man.You were saying?
Hey - I'm rubbing it in my own wounds, too.Don't rub salt, man.
It was terrible when it was first made, and terrible now. There was no point in time in which it was a good trade.Captain Hindsight, but this was a horrible trade now.
Defense a wash? Are you kidding?
I see a lot of short memories in this thread ... Nic drove a lot of fans crazy with his lazy passes, inconsistent play, and constant nagging injuries coming from his infatuation for playing overseas during the summer. 5 years/120 million for Nico? NOPE.
I remember batum being very excited about going to minny. He said he thought it was going to be a better fit, more fun, etc. he definitely wanted to leave.I was never in favor of getting rid of Nic. People like to bring up the Minnesota bullshit a while back but that was his agent pushing that one. You could tell he really loved Portland and he would of stayed here. The one dude we got rid of who would of stayed here and we are sitting here in free agency trying to get free agents at the same position just like him. Vonleh isn't a promise. I would of stuck with Batum, kept him on.
Maybe Batum disliked playing with Aldridge more than vice versa?I remember batum being very excited about going to minny. He said he thought it was going to be a better fit, more fun, etc. he definitely wanted to leave.
Maybe, I think that might've been true for dame as well.Maybe Batum disliked playing with Aldridge more than vice versa?
It really bugs me that people state it like it's gospel that trading Batum was an attempt to please LA. Give me ONE source that is remotely reliable for this. And even if it was done for that reason
1. it failed, so it was stupid
2. you don't do that. If your star is that petulant (which I don't actually believe of LA, although we all like to badmouth him now he's gone) he's not worth keeping.
Lol. Dude, multiple members on this board heard that aldridge hated batum.and said he was never gonna play another game with that pussy again after we lost to memphis.Maybe Batum disliked playing with Aldridge more than vice versa?
It really bugs me that people state it like it's gospel that trading Batum was an attempt to please LA. Give me ONE source that is remotely reliable for this. And even if it was done for that reason
1. it failed, so it was stupid
2. you don't do that. If your star is that petulant (which I don't actually believe of LA, although we all like to badmouth him now he's gone) he's not worth keeping.
