<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ASUFan22 @ Jan 5 2007, 03:19 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Yeah right, Carroll just outcoached Michigan. Michigan's coach just aint good and Michigan was overrated. USC has some of the best talent in the nation, always. Carroll just had them ready to play and they deserved to win. After a beating like that you really can't say that Michigan is better, especially since their schedule was pretty weak and the most impressive thing they did this season was losing to OSU. Well they did beat Wisconsin...</div>Oh I am not saying that Carr is a better coach or anything. I agree he got out coached, completely outcoached. Carr couldn't guard the pass if his life depended on it. Carr had a great team this year and didn't do what he should have with them. USC did deserve that win and I am not saying otherwise. I am saying that Michigan didn't play like they can play. And when I said "If they played again, the game would be completely different" you must have thought I was implying and easy win for Michigan or something. No, I wasn't. Was I saying Carr would have been a better coach? No, not really. I was trying to say however, the score wouldn't have gotten out of hand and the Michigan players would have played different. They would have played with heart and like they actually wanted to win. Because the team you saw out there was different than the team that was out playing the rest of the season. But you are giving USC to much credit. USC already has two losses on the year (to UCLA and Oregon State I might add), and if you put two more seconds on the clock Washington would have beat them. Carroll knew USC was struggling on that last drive and he was fighting to get that clock started so Washington couldn't get off a last play. Washington was on the 20 yard line or so, why not just let your defense fight it out? I mean the clock might have gone off anyways if Carroll wasn't out there screaming his head off. But no, Carroll was scared and which is why he out on the feild yelling at the refs to start the clock. Then there was the Arizona State game. That was a close one, I really thought ASU had a good chance. Then there was the Washington State game. The fact is, USC has struggled this season with their schedule. USC is a good team, but they didn't have a team to get them into first this year. I will admit however I underestimated USC and was wrong about this particular game.I also agree with LC or whoever said it, when he said that Jarrett has a ego. He does. No argueing about that. I can't say he will cause the same problems as T.O. but I can see you catogorizing him as a T.O.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The SEC is 5-3, that's not too bad.Yer sorry ass Big 11 is 2-3.
</div>As for the SEC and Big Ten. Minnesota played an awful game (how do you blow that lead?), Purdue isn't good and Maryland was hot this year, and Iowa played a hard fought game against Texas with a hurt QB in Drew Tate. Not that bad actually. By the way the Big Ten is 2-0 this year in bowl games against the SEC. But you know, the Big Ten is "Sorry ass." What does that make the SEC then? So far, on head-to-head record, Big Ten has beatten SEC big time. I am looking for another win against Florida. So that statement didn't hold up to good when you looked at the head-to-head aspect in the bowls. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying the Big Ten was better this year, you were the one that compared the two conferences with the bowl game records. But when it comes down to it, the Big Ten has actually bested the SEC in bowls this year, and as long as Ohio State wins, that will be a cemented fact.