- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,117
- Likes
- 10,950
- Points
- 113
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html
Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia
But investigate again, anyway. Why not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, if this outrages you, wait till you hear who's going to be President in January!
so few jedi masters left these daysTo be such a criminal mastermind for so long at so many levels and never get arrested, prosecuted, or even indicted? Very impressive. She clearly missed her calling!
So did Hoover....we've seen 3 anti war leaders assassinated in our lifetime here..John, Bobby and Martin....no cover up there eh? Those guys investigating those crimes were untouchable....but for some reason you find this emailing career Democratic woman to be much scarier even historically dangerous...interesting..anyone who thinks the CIA and FBI have always been good buddies has been asleep at the wheelCapone stayed on top of a similar organization for decades.
So did Hoover....we've seen 3 anti war leaders assassinated in our lifetime here..John, Bobby and Martin....no cover up there eh? Those guys investigating those crimes were untouchable....but for some reason you find this emailing career Democratic woman to be much scarier even historically dangerous...interesting..anyone who thinks the CIA and FBI have always been good buddies has been asleep at the wheel
I don't want someone worse than Nixon to be in any office.
that's fair enough....I don't though. Not threatened at all by her in anyway...not even close to Nixon but when it came to Nixon I had personal reasons...I worked directly through his chain of lies in msg processing. Hillary never got the chance in the end to be as scary as Nixon...now let's hope it doesn't get really scary under the Orange oneI have good reason to hate the woman. It's personal
I don't want someone worse than Nixon to be in any office.
There's also no risk of a bear attack in the ocean. The oceans are dead. Proof: no bears.
There's also no risk of a bear attack in the ocean. The oceans are dead. Proof: no bears.
told you they mated with sharks...
Why do you think the oceans are dead? BECAUSE BEARS KILLED THEM! Wake up, sheeple!!There's also no risk of a bear attack in the ocean. The oceans are dead. Proof: no bears.
Talking of Nixon, a friend of a friend, who lived in Orange County, next to the cemetery they buried Nixon (or so swore the friend whose friend he was), hooked up a megaphone to a tape loop of Nixon saying "You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore" and played it during the funeral. Classless, but totally worth it. I imagine right now somebody is trying to think of a way to do that with "Grab them by the pussy" during the inauguration.
In Niger, the SOF operators ran into an ambush and called for help, French air and helicopters deployed to the scene and American forces "rushed to the scene of the ambush".While people on the ground were fighting for their lives, discussions among U.S. leaders outside Libya "churned on about what we should do," but the military waited for a request for assistance from the State Department, Lovell said.
There were questions about whether the U.S. military could have responded to Benghazi in time, but "we should have tried," Lovell said.
There's a big difference, Rasta. In Benghazi, the American forces called for help, and the help was, charitably speaking, not sent.
In Niger, the SOF operators ran into an ambush and called for help, French air and helicopters deployed to the scene and American forces "rushed to the scene of the ambush".
The difference? One was a military operation. One was an attack on the State Dept. Mikel Jollette, whoever the hell he is, is wrong. 4 days after Niger, there are articles in USA Today, NYT, and others stating who it was that ambushed the team, what the team is doing there, why we're there, etc. 5 days after Benghazi, Susan Rice being ordered by the administration to "underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.", per Ben Rhodes' email.
I didn't see cabinet officials or the UN Ambassador on TV lying about the ambush on the same day.
In the heat of an election campaign, too, when the truth would have hurt Obama's reelection chances.
