Bert & Ernie @ Blazers game...+ players don't like 'Hero' ball

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Well if there saying behind closed doors then there fed playing with these 2 guys you can throw in Melo in there too. 3 years Harkless spoke out about and got bench. These guys need have a player meeting and iron this shit out. They tell how they feel about it not running a offense that's involved everyone. If they actually run a offense with player movement and ball movement that double team shit probably will go away.
 
Well if there saying behind closed doors then there fed playing with these 2 guys you can throw in Melo in there too. 3 years Harkless spoke out about and got bench. These guys need have a player meeting and iron this shit out. They tell how they feel about it not running a offense that's involved everyone. If they actually run a offense with player movement and ball movement that double team shit probably will go away.

Too many players on the team don't seem to realize there are 4 other players playing.

Damian is the only one who can get away with doing that.

CJ, Melo? Not on your life
 
Was right there with you. It boggled the mind to duplicate such redundancy when there were so many other gaping issues to address.
Isn't "duplicate redundancy" itself redundant?

One thing I've noticed is that some GMs seem to have that as a positive strategy. Remember when the Knicks signed every PF? And how Detroit last Summer signed a shit ton of centers? I'm guessing the thinking is, if you have a bunch of the same type of player then you will really be able to see the one that's the best and you can flip the rest, whereas if you just sign one, he might be a lemon.

Of course, if that's the strategy, you don't keep re-signing them to massive contracts.
 
Marang is the last reference you should use. Your thoughts are far more credible.

Appreciated...but I didn't see where Marang was incorrect in his assessment in this case.

Isn't "duplicate redundancy" itself redundant?

One thing I've noticed is that some GMs seem to have that as a positive strategy. Remember when the Knicks signed every PF? And how Detroit last Summer signed a shit ton of centers? I'm guessing the thinking is, if you have a bunch of the same type of player then you will really be able to see the one that's the best and you can flip the rest, whereas if you just sign one, he might be a lemon.

Of course, if that's the strategy, you don't keep re-signing them to massive contracts.

Knicks and Detroit....if that is Neil's model, we are in even more serious trouble.
 
Appreciated...but I didn't see where Marang was incorrect in his assessment in this case.



Knicks and Detroit....if that is Neil's model, we are in even more serious trouble.
The dude acts like Stotts is a top-level coach and Aaron Gordon wouldve saved our entire season and won us a championship, so I dont trust a single one of his takes.
 
The dude acts like Stotts is a top-level coach and Aaron Gordon wouldve saved our entire season and won us a championship, so I dont trust a single one of his takes.

That is certainly not what he has said of late.
 
That is certainly not what he has said of late.
What has he said? Is he agreeing with all the people he blatantly insulted for their opinions in the last year? Is he now a "flat-earther", as he would call it?
 
You just completely made that up. Do you write other fiction as well?
Yah, cuz everything on a message board is researched, referenced and based on facts. GTFO here with that weak-ass shit. Maybe time to put your rose coloured glasses back on and continue your unconditional love of Terry Stotts and the team that Olshey has built?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top