- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 127,321
- Likes
- 147,837
- Points
- 115
So where does LMA end up on the list?
Has to be 3rd or 4th.
Has to be 3rd or 4th.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So where does LMA end up on the list?
Has to be 3rd or 4th.
Walton, Drexler and Roy are the best players to play for the franchise, though obviously Walton and Roy had short peaks before injuries wrecked their careers. I think Sheed and Aldridge is an interesting comparison, and I'd probably lean to preferring Wallace (and I have no anger towards Aldridge for leaving; I've never felt athletes choosing their own free agent destiny reflects poorly on them). So I'd say that Aldridge is probably at best the fourth-best players in Blazers' history, but I'd place him fifth.
But that's strictly from a basketball standpoint. I would put Grant above him if you look at "best blazer" to include work in the community, teammate, etc.
Yeah, I'm not generally too interested in all of that (even for teams in my area) when ranking "best players," but everyone has a different conception for what that entails. My focus is generally purely on the court/field/diamond.
Well, strictly from a court point of view, I would say that Grant might not have had the numbers, but his defense, his motor, and his energy was inspiring to the team.
Solid!Sam Bowie
Walton, Drexler and Roy are the best players to play for the franchise, though obviously Walton and Roy had short peaks before injuries wrecked their careers. I think Sheed and Aldridge is an interesting comparison, and I'd probably lean to preferring Wallace (and I have no anger towards Aldridge for leaving; I've never felt athletes choosing their own free agent destiny reflects poorly on them). So I'd say that Aldridge is probably at best the fourth-best players in Blazers' history, but I'd place him fifth.
