Politics Birther 2.0?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
julius said:
This guy is such a knob.

Click to expand...

There are so many people with blue check marks that say stupid shit and you’re giving this idiot a whole thread? Interesting choice
 
Cippy91 said:
There are so many people with blue check marks that say stupid shit and you’re giving this idiot a whole thread? Interesting choice
Click to expand...

If you feel there are plenty of people out there with blue check marks who say stupid things and deserve to have a thread made about them, then by all means, go ahead and do it. Or you could just sit on the sidelines, doing no research and just making snide comments thinking you've totally put people in their places.
 
Not only that, but one of the reasons why people post things on here, is to talk about it or expose it to the light. And that's partly what I did here. I know that this is the same idiot who tried to have a press conference to accuse Robert Mueller of raping a woman, and it failed miserably. Like, epic failure bad.

So in a way, it's a Rorschach test.

And before you inquire, that's the royal you, so calm your tits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
julius said:
Not only that, but one of the reasons why people post things on here, is to talk about it or expose it to the light. And that's partly what I did here. I know that this is the same idiot who tried to have a press conference to accuse Robert Mueller of raping a woman, and it failed miserably. Like, epic failure bad.

So in a way, it's a Rorschach test. If you are defending this idiot or think he is telling the truth, it further exposes you as a huge fucking idiot that most of us think you are.

And before you inquire, that's the royal you, so calm your tits.
Click to expand...
My response would be that I had no idea who the guy is. So if you do, you spend too much time on twitter. The royal you obviously
 
Oh and as to Kamala and why she can't be President it is because she is a sleeper cell.
 
julius said:
If you feel there are plenty of people out there with blue check marks who say stupid things and deserve to have a thread made about them, then by all means, go ahead and do it. Or you could just sit on the sidelines, doing no research and just making snide comments thinking you've totally put people in their places.
Click to expand...
No research on what? I’m saying this guy is stupid and you have devoted a whole thread to what he has said. Is this not true? I mean you’re starting a narrative based off one idiot because he as a blue check mark by his name. Would you be posting this if he wasn’t verified? Curious
 
julius said:
Not only that, but one of the reasons why people post things on here, is to talk about it or expose it to the light. And that's partly what I did here. I know that this is the same idiot who tried to have a press conference to accuse Robert Mueller of raping a woman, and it failed miserably. Like, epic failure bad.

So in a way, it's a Rorschach test.

And before you inquire, that's the royal you, so calm your tits.
Click to expand...
Oh so I’m defending him now? Oh okay. You must be doing good. Lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
julius said:
This guy is such a knob.

Click to expand...


If you say so. But his question is valid.

However, It appears her father did in fact legally immigrate and has been here (apparently) for the requisite time for her to be a Natural Born Citizen.
I don't know where the guy got the 5 year requirement prior to her birth. I know of no such requirement.

So unlike Obama, her father did make her a Natural born citizen (near as I can see in a quick research)
 
Cippy91 said:
Oh so I’m defending him now? And I’m a huge fucking idiot? Oh okay. You must be doing good. Lol
Click to expand...

Oh dear God, I even said it was the royal you.
 
According to the United States Constitution, all persons born in the United States are citizens by birth. Even Democrats who are not white.
 
crandc said:
According to the United States Constitution, all persons born in the United States are citizens by birth. Even Democrats who are not white.
Click to expand...


Yes dear! But the requirement for holding the office of President is to be a Natural Born Citizen!

Proud Democrat.jpg
 
Harris's father is a naturalized citizen of the United States. He came here legally in 1961 and became a citizen. His daughter Kamal born in the United States is therefore a natural citizen.
 
Cippy91 said:
No research on what? I’m saying this guy is stupid and you have devoted a whole thread to what he has said. Is this not true? I mean you’re starting a narrative based off one idiot because he as a blue check mark by his name. Would you be posting this if he wasn’t verified? Curious
Click to expand...
Good point.
 
Chris Craig said:
Harris's father is a naturalized citizen of the United States. He came here legally in 1961 and became a citizen. His daughter Kamal born in the United States is therefore a natural citizen.
Click to expand...

As I recall, technically after he was here 15 years, as according to the original naturalization law of 1792 or so that I think would be the logical precedent setting law,
she would indeed become a Natural Born Citizen. Where as she was a mere citizen before that time.
 
MarAzul said:
I would send you some reading, but I know you won't.
Click to expand...

you have readings that show they annulled the 14th amendment? Or that contradicts article II section I?

No where in the constitution does it say anything about a persons being a citizen ONLY if one of their parents is a citizen at the time of that persons birth. Nor does it say anything about the naturalization status of the candidates parents.

These are the requirements:

  • The individual must have been born in the United States or born to a parent who is a citizen of the United States;
  • The individual must be 35 years of age or older;
  • The individual must have been a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.

Also, from the 14th Amendment:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

So, I'm eager to see this reading....
 
julius said:
you have readings that show they annulled the 14th amendment? Or that contradicts article II section I?

No where in the constitution does it say anything about a persons being a citizen ONLY if one of their parents is a citizen at the time of that persons birth. Nor does it say anything about the naturalization status of the candidates parents.

These are the requirements:

  • The individual must have been born in the United States or born to a parent who is a citizen of the United States;
  • The individual must be 35 years of age or older;
  • The individual must have been a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.

Also, from the 14th Amendment:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

So, I'm eager to see this reading....
Click to expand...
Didn't we already have an entire "birthright citizenship" thread about this? The whole claim (spurrious though it may be) was that people who are born citizens of another country (because their parents are citizens of another country) are not "subject to the jurisdiction of" this one, and therefore should not be considered "natural born citizens".

Now as far as I know, that interpretation has never been codified, so it wouldn't/couldn't be applicable to Harris, but as I understand it, that is the basis of the original troll's tweet.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Didn't we already have an entire "birthright citizenship" thread about this? The whole claim (spurrious though it may be) was that people who are born citizens of another country (because their parents are citizens of another country) are not "subject to the jurisdiction of" this one, and therefore should not be considered "natural born citizens".

Now as far as I know, that interpretation has never been codified, so it wouldn't/couldn't be applicable to Harris, but as I understand it, that is the basis of the original troll's tweet.
Click to expand...
This thread can put an end to the " @MarAzul must be racist" crap.
 
julius said:
you have readings that show they annulled the 14th amendment? Or that contradicts article II section I?

No where in the constitution does it say anything about a persons being a citizen ONLY if one of their parents is a citizen at the time of that persons birth. Nor does it say anything about the naturalization status of the candidates parents.

These are the requirements:

  • The individual must have been born in the United States or born to a parent who is a citizen of the United States;
  • The individual must be 35 years of age or older;
  • The individual must have been a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.
Click to expand...

Article II.
Section 1.
Paragraph 5.

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Didn't we already have an entire "birthright citizenship" thread about this? The whole claim (spurrious though it may be) was that people who are born citizens of another country (because their parents are citizens of another country) are not "subject to the jurisdiction of" this one, and therefore should not be considered "natural born citizens".

Now as far as I know, that interpretation has never been codified, so it wouldn't/couldn't be applicable to Harris, but as I understand it, that is the basis of the original troll's tweet.
Click to expand...
I don't know who "the original troll" is.
 
Lanny said:
I don't know who "the original troll" is.
Click to expand...
The author of the tweet quoted in the OP. Apparently some young dude without a fully-formed prefrontal cortex who has a large following for Lord-only-knows what reason.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
The author of the tweet quoted in the OP. Apparently some young dude without a fully-formed prefrontal cortex who has a large following for Lord-only-knows what reason.
Click to expand...
Oh, you're talking about Jacob Wohl. I thought you might be referring to Julius.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top