ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA! Joined Sep 12, 2008 Messages 31,865 Likes 5,785 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #1 I could see Blake sitting most of the 4th Quarters. So, yeah, might be close.
anonymous gambler Member Joined Oct 15, 2008 Messages 693 Likes 12 Points 18 Oct 24, 2009 #2 A difference is that Stoudamire was actually a superior offensive player. Blake is only better at uncontested 3's.
A difference is that Stoudamire was actually a superior offensive player. Blake is only better at uncontested 3's.
ABM Happily Married In Music City, USA! Joined Sep 12, 2008 Messages 31,865 Likes 5,785 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #3 anonymous gambler said: A difference is that Stoudamire was actually a superior offensive player. Blake is only better at uncontested 3's. Click to expand... I suppose my basic point was, the "overall" better player was successfully coming off the bench.
anonymous gambler said: A difference is that Stoudamire was actually a superior offensive player. Blake is only better at uncontested 3's. Click to expand... I suppose my basic point was, the "overall" better player was successfully coming off the bench.
Wizard Mentor Wizard Mentor Joined Oct 22, 2008 Messages 14,707 Likes 15,005 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #4 I'd trade Blake or Miller for an in his prime Anthony. He could hit the 3, and he played very good defense. Of course, Batum will be better than Augmon (but I did like Augmon).
I'd trade Blake or Miller for an in his prime Anthony. He could hit the 3, and he played very good defense. Of course, Batum will be better than Augmon (but I did like Augmon).
Natebishop3 Don't tread on me! Joined Sep 17, 2008 Messages 94,328 Likes 57,641 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #5 Wizard Mentor said: I'd trade Blake or Miller for an in his prime Anthony. He could hit the 3, and he played very good defense. Of course, Batum will be better than Augmon (but I did like Augmon). Click to expand... Anthony was great at what he did, and I would love to have him, but he was not better than Miller.
Wizard Mentor said: I'd trade Blake or Miller for an in his prime Anthony. He could hit the 3, and he played very good defense. Of course, Batum will be better than Augmon (but I did like Augmon). Click to expand... Anthony was great at what he did, and I would love to have him, but he was not better than Miller.
THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest Joined Sep 16, 2008 Messages 74,157 Likes 64,046 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #6 Miller is a far better PG then Anthony. Greg filled a role perfectly, Andre can lead a team!
RoyIsClutch07 Active Member Joined Aug 15, 2009 Messages 1,116 Likes 2 Points 38 Oct 24, 2009 #7 Natebishop3 said: Anthony was great at what he did, and I would love to have him, but he was not better than Miller. Click to expand... No, no way. Either is Stoudamire.
Natebishop3 said: Anthony was great at what he did, and I would love to have him, but he was not better than Miller. Click to expand... No, no way. Either is Stoudamire.
MARIS61 Real American Joined Sep 12, 2008 Messages 28,007 Likes 5,012 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #8 I'd take Blake over all 3 of them.
Natebishop3 Don't tread on me! Joined Sep 17, 2008 Messages 94,328 Likes 57,641 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #9 MARIS61 said: I'd take Blake over all 3 of them. Click to expand...
Nikolokolus There's always next year Joined Sep 19, 2008 Messages 30,704 Likes 6,198 Points 113 Oct 24, 2009 #10 MARIS61 said: I'd take Blake over all 3 of them. Click to expand... Sure.