- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 60,676
- Likes
- 61,190
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not disagreeing, but it's depressing our 2nd best GM on this, drafted Sam Bowie and not some other dude...
No people dont care what the Celtics did because they have 17 championships. People wouldnt care as much about the Blazers missing KD or MJ, Or Barkley, if they had more trophies.Look at the roster sizes of NBA teams and look at how handicapped small market teams are in acquiring talent. That's if big market teams don't steal it first. People remember the mistakes from small market teams because their is so little player movement. The Celtics passed up Kobe Bryant and Steve Nash. Does anybody give a shit? No. Because they are the Celtics. If your team has like two or three options to get better every year and that's it... you aren't to be lie a red headed step child. What? "You made a mistake... you ALWAYS make mistakes."
Didn't most of their championships occur when there were only 8 teams in the entire league?No people dont care what the Celtics did because they have 17 championships. People wouldnt care as much about the Blazers missing KD or MJ, Or Barkley, if they had more trophies.
good write-up CC, and for the most part, I'd agree with it. Maybe a couple of quibbles and of course, quibbling is the lifeblood of the internet
I've never been clear on just how much credit KP should get for the 2006 draft. He certainly wanted credit for it, but KP was always blowing his own horn...there might be video of it on another type of website
maybe an honorable mention for Chad Buchanan? He was the interim GM who traded Crash for the draft pick that brought Dame to Portland, and he was in charge of scouting when 'reportedly' the Blazers zeroed in on Lillard as the primary target
Yes many of them are from a long time ago, but there's a difference in the level of criticism that gets levied at what is looked at as a successful franchise vs what's looked at as an unsuccessful one.Didn't most of their championships occur when there were only 8 teams in the entire league?
No people dont care what the Celtics did because they have 17 championships. People wouldnt care as much about the Blazers missing KD or MJ, Or Barkley, if they had more trophies.
I've heard from the other GM's of the teams they traded with (Boston, Minnesota, and Chicago) that they dealt with Pritchard on the phones for those deals. Patterson tried to take credit for the draft though after the fact.I gave Pritchard credit for the 2006 draft, are you saying he doesn't deserve it.
Thanks for pointing out Chad, I had those tidbits in my note, oh so many notes in my research for this article, forgot to include him as interim after Cho, fixed that!
Yeah, I was talking with a Pistons fan about how Atlanta (and Phoenix and Sacramento) must feel watching Doncic. I brought up that I know exactly how that feels as a Blazer fan.No people dont care what the Celtics did because they have 17 championships. People wouldnt care as much about the Blazers missing KD or MJ, Or Barkley, if they had more trophies.
Yes, but you can claim stupid management and missed opportunitiesYeah, I was talking with a Pistons fan about how Atlanta (and Phoenix and Sacramento) must feel watching Doncic. I brought up that I know exactly how that feels as a Blazer fan.
He was like "me too, we took Darko over Melo, Bosh, and Wade." I said that doesn't count because they won the championship that season. You can't claim hardship when you won it all that same year.


