Blazer's edge: "Portland Trail Blazers Free Agent Chase: What's the Story?"

[magnifier661]

http://www.blazersedge.com/2013/7/3...zers-free-agent-chris-kaman-lamarcus-aldridge

The Modest Center Signing

The Blazers have enough cap space to entice players like Chris Kaman, Zaza Pachulia, and Samuel Dalembert into the fold. They can still get a starting center, just not a young, prime one. The interpretation of this kind of move can go either way. It could be seen as tucking tail and slinking out of the free agency period or it could be seen as having so much confidence in the young centers on the roster that you don't need more than a two-year, 25 mpg rental starter before they're ready.

The Less-Modest Guard Signing

O.J. Mayo and Jarrett Jack are still on the board if the Blazers wanted to forget centers entirely and make a run at a point-producing backcourt player with a splashy name. These guys would be more valuable assets than any of the centers mentioned above. At the same time it's hard to see the Blazers cramming another player into a backcourt populated by Damian Lillard, Wesley Matthews, and new draftee C.J. McCollum.

The Little Salary-Dump Trade

If the Blazers can find a taker for Joel Freeland's contract they'd conceivably have enough money to sign two modest veterans (e.g. Kaman and Carl Landry) or one big free agent (like taking a desperate stab at Pekovic).

The Big Trade

The Blazers could still consider trading Wesley Matthews or Nicolas Batum,with or without smaller contracts, to make a run at anybody they desire. These contracts would clear enough cap space for the Blazers to absorb almost any available player whether free agent, sign-and-trade recipient, or just a dude on another team.

Folks might want to keep an eye on Wesley Matthews' situation. Portland has already crowded the shooting guard position by picking up C.J. McCollum and Allen Crabbe to go along with Matthews and Will Barton. If they chase anyone else who leans towards shooting guard you have to believe that somebody's going to get moved.

The Whopper Trade

We talked about LaMarcus Aldridge trade possibilities yesterday. There's no need to rehearse those except to say that every step the Blazers make towards youth and every failure to bring in top-notch veteran talent makes Aldridge less of a fit for this franchise. Surprises are possible, but in general waiting on free agents is not a good sign for those on Aldridge watch.

The Sneaky Sign-and-Trade

Technically the Blazers haven't released J.J. Hickson yet. If another team valued him in a sign-and-trade arrangement because they were over the cap and couldn't sign him outright, the Blazers could still oblige.

Blazer fans can certainly take heart. Options yet abound, at least in terms of executing a move. Potential targets for that move may be another story, so caution is in order too. Striking out in free agency is an ever-present peril especially when you're working from Portland's position, lacking both money and a winning record.

Blazer fans may expect that the team will do something. That something may end up looking like a Chris Kaman signing and not much else. Debate can then ensue whether something was better than nothing.

What's your call? If you were going into free agency hoping for Omer Asik and O.J. Mayo, JaVale McGee and Jarrett Jack, Marcin Gortat and J.J. Redick, would Chris Kaman, Thomas Robinson, and C.J. McCollum be enough of a consolation prize for you? If not, what kind of signing or trade would turn it around in your mind?

 

[Pinwheel1]

"If you were going into free agency hoping for Omer Asik and O.J. Mayo, JaVale McGee and Jarrett Jack, Marcin Gortat and J.J. Redick, would Chris Kaman, Thomas Robinson, and C.J. McCollum be enough of a consolation prize for you? If not, what kind of signing or trade would turn it around in your mind?"
========================================
Most of those he mentioned as top FA targets did not exactly get me excited either. But this part of the article was interesting: " Technically the Blazers haven't released J.J. Hickson yet. If another team valued him in a sign-and-trade arrangement because they were over the cap and couldn't sign him outright, the Blazers could still oblige."

 

[magnifier661]

Most of those he mentioned as top FA targets did not exactly get me excited either. But this part of the article was interesting: " Technically the Blazers haven't released J.J. Hickson yet. If another team valued him in a sign-and-trade arrangement because they were over the cap and couldn't sign him outright, the Blazers could still oblige.

I agree. There is a good opportunity here.

 

[BigGameDamian]

The Milwaukee Bucks are moving closer to a deal with O.J. Mayo.

Mayo spent last season with the Dallas Mavericks.

Mayo would presumably replace free agent Monta Ellis.

Are we really about to lose out to the Bucks?

 

[KeepOnRollin]

The Milwaukee Bucks are moving closer to a deal with O.J. Mayo.

Mayo spent last season with the Dallas Mavericks.

Mayo would presumably replace free agent Monta Ellis.

Are we really about to lose out to the Bucks?

I don't like Mayo but I like him a lot better for the Bucks then having Ellis. And we aren't going to pay someone like Mayo 8+ MIL a year so yes we are going to lose out on him.

 

[HailBlazers]

Mayo? Only on my sandwich please.

 

[BBert]

We aren't going to 'lose out' on a player we aren't after.

 

[magnifier661]

The Milwaukee Bucks are moving closer to a deal with O.J. Mayo.

Mayo spent last season with the Dallas Mavericks.

Mayo would presumably replace free agent Monta Ellis.

Are we really about to lose out to the Bucks?

Next thing you'll say is "We need to get Carter ASAP!" LMAO!

 

[Draco]

Obviously you keep an ear open to any trade possibilities, but I think I like "The Less-Modest Guard Signing" strategy the best.

The main problem with our roster is a lack of talent and depth. If we can sign a guy who is worth more than his contract he will be an asset. Lets build up assets and depth right now, we can worry about consolidation or fit with a later move. If we have 4 rotational worthy guards the coach can reduce minutes and play an up-tempo style. There is also a very real chance one is injured or underperforming and then our depth would be much needed.

 

[Pinwheel1]

The main problem with our roster is a lack of talent and depth. .

They are not far off. If they can get one center and a back up PG, then they have talent and depth IMO at every position. I realize that is a big if, but I am liking the rest of the roster.