Blazers granted injury exception

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

"45-day clock for such exceptions starts when team knows injury likely season-ending. Oden exception expires Dec. 30. "

Trade coming soon...
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

bargaining.jpg
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

miami got one for haslem too

:ohno:
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

Paging Denny Crane, paging Denny Crane.
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

So the Blazers can use the extra $3.4M to make salaries match in a trade right?
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

No, can't be combined in a deal with one of our players. We can use it to acquire a player who makes 3.4 million or under. but we can't, say, use it and a 4 million dollar player to get an 8 million dollar guy.
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

No, can't be combined in a deal with one of our players. We can use it to acquire a player who makes 3.4 million or under. but we can't, say, use it and a 4 million dollar player to get an 8 million dollar guy.

Oh. I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. Do the Blazers have to waive a player to use the exception? Or can you carry a 16-man roster if granted the exception? I suppose I could look up Larry Coon's take, but I'm guessing you know the answer. :)
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

Have to waive someone if they use it to add a player.
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

Hey, I used to have that exact same photo of Emmanuel Lewis as my avatar for a period of time last year. What inspired you to use it?

weird. i just googled webster today for an image and it popped up. Just kind of a funny picture.
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

'Tone just said on the radio they can sign a 16th player, or use it and combine it with another asset to trade for a player.
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

then he doesn't know what he's talking about. Can't combine it, and can't add a spot to the roster, from what I have read.
 
Technically you can combine exceptions with other assets, but it functionally does you no more good than two separate deals. The exception gets its own "bucket" that can only bring back something of the same size in dollars, and the other asset(s) are their own bucket. They don't combine into one "salary bucket" that can bring back their combined dollar value in one asset.
 
Technically you can combine exceptions with other assets, but it functionally does you no more good than two separate deals. The exception gets its own "bucket" that can only bring back something of the same size in dollars, and the other asset(s) are their own bucket. They don't combine into one "salary bucket" that can bring back their combined dollar value in one asset.

Is it basically like a trade exception in terms of "buckets"?
 
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q19

DISABLED PLAYER EXCEPTION -- This exception allows a team which is over the cap to acquire a replacement for a disabled player who will be out for the remainder of that season (if the player is disabled between July 1 and November 30) or the following season (if the player is disabled after November 30). This exception can also be granted in the event of a player's death. This exception can only be used to acquire one player. The maximum salary for the replacement player is 50% of the injured player's salary, or the average salary, whichever is less (see question number 25 for the definition of "average salary"). Approval from the league (based on a determination by an NBA-designated physician) is required for this exception to be used. This exception can be used to sign a free agent, or to create room to accept a salary in trade. When used for trade, the team may acquire a player whose salary (including any trade bonus) is up to 100% of this exception plus $100,000 (not 125%). Also see question number 20 for more information on the availability and use of this exception.

If a player is disabled between July 1 and November 30, the team must acquire the replacement player within 45 days. If the player is disabled between December 1 and June 30, then the team has until October 1 to sign a replacement. If the disabled player comes back sooner than expected, then he may be activated immediately, and the replacement player is not affected. However, if the disabled player comes back before the exception is used, then the exception is lost.

Teams sometimes have had difficulty getting the NBA to approve an injury exception. For example, Danny Manning tore an ACL toward the end of the 1997-98 season, yet the NBA did not approve the Suns for this exception. More recently, the Magic did not receive this exception in 2003 for Grant Hill. However, this exception was granted in the 1999 offseason to San Antonio, so they could replace Sean Elliott, who was disabled due to kidney problems. This exception was also granted to Charlotte soon after Bobby Phills was killed.

Don't confuse this exception with the salary cap relief teams can apply for a year after losing a player to a career-ending injury or death (see question number 55). This exception allows a team to acquire a replacement player. The salary cap relief removes a contract from the books.
 
Re: Blazersx granted injury exception

'Tone just said on the radio they can sign a 16th player, or use it and combine it with another asset to trade for a player.
Yep. I was listening to the pre-game show and Harvey and some other dolt kept going on about how we could add a 16th player; how we could combine the $3.4 million with a player in trade for a higher salaried player; and about how super smart they both were for knowing that. :crazy:
 
1) We're competing with Miami for the few decent players available around the league. 2) We have to waive a player as part of the deal. 3) The deadline to complete negotiations and formalize the trade is only 19 days from now. 4) Many of those days are when other GMs are gone for the holidays. 5) The list of $3.4M players available on such short notice is very short itself.

Don't be surprised if we use only a third of the $3.4M.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top