Blazers impressed with Matthews IQ

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MickZagger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
37,495
Likes
16,463
Points
113
http://www.columbian.com/news/2010/oct/03/blazers-pleased-with-matthews-intensity-and-defens/

“We are talking about a guy who had a good year and has to grow from that,’’ McMillan said. “The potential is there. What we saw last year was Wesley Matthews. I don’t think that was a fluke. I think he’s going to get better and that hard work is what will establish identity in this league.”

But more than anything, McMillan — a Jerry Sloan disciple in coaching philosophies — is eager to have Matthew’s grittiness on defense anchor the Blazers this season.
 
McMillan-trained players are softies. He turns each into a complex of inhibitions, terrified to make a turnover, always looking to Roy to take over.

Cho needs to trade players who started here for players who have already been taught by 1 or 2 NBA coaches, who allowed them to just play.
 
Martell Webster was supposedly intelligent, too. Let's hope Matthews pans out better than he did.
 
"Supposed to be" and "is" are two completely different things
 
We will soon depend as much upon Matthews as Roy to win games. He's less talented, but more tough.

Now that Pritchard's gone, we can lose the goal of being the youngest team in the league, and trade to get experience. By "experience" I mean at least 1 year learning under an NBA coach other than McMillan. That's equivalent to about 5 baby years of being here.
 
listen, i like martells game as a backup but as far as who is smarter between him and wes.....

its not close.

we might have had 2 of the dumbest NBA players in Travis and Martell. Throw in Zach to that mix and its scary as far as tea IQ goes.
 
McMillan-trained players are softies. He turns each into a complex of inhibitions, terrified to make a turnover, always looking to Roy to take over.

Cho needs to trade players who started here for players who have already been taught by 1 or 2 NBA coaches, who allowed them to just play.


Or bring a coach in that will just let them play. I know.......crazy idea, huh?
 
...said head coach Nate McMillan about the Blazers 6-foot-5, 250-pound shooting guard who played last season for the Utah Jazz.

Is he really 250? That's pretty heavy for a 6'5 NBA player.
 
Ah, a praise for Matthews thread turns to rip on coach. Cool. Got it.

I'm excited about Matthews. I think he has a higher upside than most of us realize and I think his contribution is noticed immediately - in over 80 games.

Can I just state, Oden on the other hand....20 games...max. :confused:
 
i just hope oden can play a 5 on 5 pickup game at some point
 
Where does one acquire Tea IQ points?
 
Ah, a praise for Matthews thread turns to rip on coach. Cool. Got it.

I'm excited about Matthews. I think he has a higher upside than most of us realize and I think his contribution is noticed immediately - in over 80 games.

Can I just state, Oden on the other hand....20 games...max. :confused:


What's sad about your number is that I was hoping for 3 times that number, and that is only 60 games.
 
I'm excited about Matthews. I think he has a higher upside than most of us realize and I think his contribution is noticed immediately - in over 80 games.

I was kind of shocked how he came out at the Fan fest. The dude is fearless... exactly what the team needed.
 
Matthews is going to be a great role player. A perfect compliment to Roy, Aldridge, and Batum.
 
It was nice seeing him live, he did a really good job of being in the right place at the right time and seemed to get the concept of spacing on both offense and defense ... but then again he played 4 years at Marquette and a year under Jerry Sloan so it's almost a given. As for the comparison to Martell, I think Marty was plenty smart -- as evidenced by the fact that he became a pretty good defender by the time he was done here -- but his real problem in my opinion is that he's a rhythm shooter who relies on a lot of FGAs to get into that rhythm and he was also prone to get the yips when the pressure was on; I don't know if Matthews is immune to that, but that's not his reported MO.
 
Is he really 250? That's pretty heavy for a 6'5 NBA player.
thats got to be a typo... 220 is what he came in at for his predraft and is his listed weight

STOMP
 
I'm not surprised by Matthews. Our scouts surveyed the whole league and picked this one guy as the best one to fit McMillan's system, of all free agents available this summer. That's why they paid him so much, because they expect him to earn it as a star for this particular team (not necessarily a star for other teams).

Pritchard believed you build through the draft. He was wrong. Especially once you're not getting high picks anymore. Even high picks succeed only 50% of the time (see Bayless). Camby, Miller, Matthews...get us more experience and McMillan will have an easier time. A lot of successful coaches aren't good teachers, and he's one of them.
 
Ah, a praise for Matthews thread turns to rip on coach. Cool. Got it.

I'm excited about Matthews. I think he has a higher upside than most of us realize and I think his contribution is noticed immediately - in over 80 games.

Can I just state, Oden on the other hand....20 games...max. :confused:

yeah, too bad some here have so little I.Q.
 
I'm not surprised by Matthews. Our scouts surveyed the whole league and picked this one guy as the best one to fit McMillan's system, of all free agents available this summer. That's why they paid him so much, because they expect him to earn it as a star for this particular team (not necessarily a star for other teams).

Well put. I couldn't believe how inane the "Blazers don't have a plan" threads were after we picked up Matthews.

Pritchard believed you build through the draft. He was wrong. Especially once you're not getting high picks anymore. Even high picks succeed only 50% of the time (see Bayless). Camby, Miller, Matthews...get us more experience and McMillan will have an easier time. A lot of successful coaches aren't good teachers, and he's one of them.

I don't quite agree with this. I generally ascribe to the conventional wisdom that KP had the right idea of "stockpiling talent", but he fell to in love with the players he drafted and thus was unable to trade them.
 
Wes is not 6'5! He's about as tall as Bayless. When he was standing right next to Rudy, he was way shorter. And I'd say he looks about 210.
 
Wesley Matthews will be John Lund's guest at 1:30 PM today on 95.5 The Game.
 
Wes is not 6'5! He's about as tall as Bayless. When he was standing right next to Rudy, he was way shorter. And I'd say he looks about 210.

6'5'' is not his physical size...it's the size he plays up to, with his intelligence and heart.

He's really just over 5' tall.
 
Wes is not 6'5! He's about as tall as Bayless. When he was standing right next to Rudy, he was way shorter. And I'd say he looks about 210.

Predraft measurements have Wes at 6'5.25" and Rudy at 6'6"
 
That's neat^ He is nowhere near as tall as Rudy!
 
That's neat^ He is nowhere near as tall as Rudy!



So it's either official NBA pre draft measurements, or HCP's post beer drinking eye balling it? This IS a tough choice.

Kidding aside, I believe the pre draft measurements, but when I watched on the justin tv feed, there was a moment that Wes and Rudy were next to each other, and Wes did look shorter. It could have been the angle, or the body shape as well.
 
I'm not surprised by Matthews. Our scouts surveyed the whole league and picked this one guy as the best one to fit McMillan's system, of all free agents available this summer. That's why they paid him so much, because they expect him to earn it as a star for this particular team (not necessarily a star for other teams).

Pritchard believed you build through the draft. He was wrong. Especially once you're not getting high picks anymore. Even high picks succeed only 50% of the time (see Bayless). Camby, Miller, Matthews...get us more experience and McMillan will have an easier time. A lot of successful coaches aren't good teachers, and he's one of them.

Yet KP brought in the three examples you name after we quit getting high picks. Go figure.

Go Blazers
 
I was kind of shocked how he came out at the Fan fest. The dude is fearless... exactly what the team needed.

Damn! He came out at Fan Fest? He sure is fearless! I'll have to tell the guys at outsports.com.

(sorry, Paxil, you walked into that one)
 
I see they started the rookie Johnson over Marty.
 
I saw a picture of Roy standing next to Matthews. They looked like they were the same size.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top