I don't really have a dog in this fight since I'm not in the anti-Stotts crowd (ambivalent but I do think it might be time for a change)...
...but, I don't think some made FG's by players other than Dame is the gauge that matters, rather what matters is wins. It's the playoffs and there are no moral victories, especially in a sweep. And over the last 4 seasons, in the series when Portland has been eliminated they are 1-16. Sure, 12 of those losses have come against the Warriors (and the single win 4 seasons ago), but Portland has not made any progress against them when it counts and have now lost 10 straight.
And in all of those 17 games, the same template has been used to great success: stop-Dame-stop-the-Blazers. Opponents get a 2-for-1 with that strategy because at the same time they take out Portland's best scorer, they also shut down the only guy capable of consistently running the offense. Double bonus, and the Blazers have the same vulnerability now they had 4 years ago.
and let's set the record straight...you mentioned other guys making shots: against the Warriors, CJ shot 39% on FG's and 35% on three's; Hood shot 40% on FG's and 29% on three's.; Curry shot 35% on FG's and 37% on three's; and Aminu shot 33% on FG's and 17% on three's. And those 4 guys combined for 38 shots a game....yikes!
now, maybe this isn't so much the fault of Stotts. Maybe no coach could scheme his way out of a major roster weakness. In that case it's the fault of management, but then, there have been a whole bunch of people here celebrating the extensions for both Stotts and Olshey while telling critics to eat crow. (in this case I think the sentiment is crow = shit). So then, it's either the stop-Dame-stop-the-Blazers template is a case of don't believe your lying eyes, or one of Olshey/Stotts have dropped the ball big time. I know where I come down in that, but where do you?