Blazers sold on Bayless as PG of the future

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

That doesn't make him a poor sport at all.

Not very professional or intelligent though. Could you see Brandon, Lamarcus, or Greg saying these things about a fellow draftee. This outburst has got to be a red flag for Pritchard, who base their opinions on players on other aspects than basketball skills.

Besides, what Jennings alludes to doesn't even make sense.
 
bayless is NOT a point guard!!!!! He reminds me of a kid I played college basketball with. He has tunnel vision! He just does not see the floor. And I don't think its something you can teach. I'm not saying he can't be a good player but he is 100% NOT a point guard.

Kinda like Roy isnt 100% a Shooting Guard? :clap:
 
Not very professional or intelligent though. Could you see Brandon, Lamarcus, or Greg saying these things about a fellow draftee. This outburst has got to be a red flag for Pritchard, who base their opinions on players on other aspects than basketball skills.

Besides, what Jennings alludes to doesn't even make sense.

I don't think its wrong that he thinks he's a better player than Rubio.
 
You're selecting a few of the greatest floor leaders of all-time. No one is saying Bayless is or will have the almost preternatural ability to sense where the ball should go. But those aren't the only players who can be point guards. Using an analogy, the greatest chess masters in the world may have an innate and unusual pattern-matching ability perfectly tuned for chess (which they have to refine with lots and lots of playing). But even people without that can become great chess players, deriving a high-level pattern-matching ability from lots of work and experience.

So, sure, Bayless may never appear to make magical passes, but if he can draw defenders and find open teammates, he can be a very successful point guard for this team. Roy has plenty of play-making ability too, so Bayless doesn't have to be one of the great play-makers in the league. If he can hit shots when playing off the ball and drive-and-dish when he's playing on the ball, he'll be a great complement to Roy.

Remember, Bayless was a point guard in high school and recruited to Arizona as a point guard. He played shooting guard at Arizona due to injury to their planned shooting guard. He has played the role and was expected to at a high level. I think there's good reason that the Blazers have confidence in him to be their point guard of the future.

Great points.

I'm not sure that the team has put all their eggs into the Bayless basket yet. But I'm sure they'd love to, if everything goes at it could/should during the next 6-12 months.
 
Put it this way. How's Jennings going to handle it if he's beat out of the rotation on a team by another player and he's asked how he feels about that?


That's a fair question. Trash-talking a rival is one thing - but turn that crap against a team-mate and that's a real problem.
 
Well not exactly. LA is paying Odom, a reserve, $14M this season. But that's about the only glaring rich-contract reserve.
Ginobli, Jason Terry, Maggette & Camby all make some healthy scratch off the bench as well... hell, Kirilenko makes even more

STOMP
 
Put it this way. How's Jennings going to handle it if he's beat out of the rotation on a team by another player and he's asked how he feels about that?

He hasn't done that to a team mate and if he does it would be justified to call him a poor sport. Nothing he said about Rubio was even that bad, it was low level trash talk, and to me there is nothing wrong with it. If you are more sensitive to it or dislike it very much, fair enough.
 
I think he's just immature with his emotions...Poor sport probably isn't fair at this point...Emotional about calls from time to time...To me he's a lot like Iverson except left handed and a better flashy passer who is turnover prone...Second best pg I've seen at the high school level. The best was Tywon Lawson, go figure...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top