Jizzy
Capo Status
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2007
- Messages
- 2,613
- Likes
- 1
- Points
- 38
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 27 2008, 08:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (NetIncome @ Feb 27 2008, 06:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>As Dumpy noted, Boone did a NUMBER on the most dominant big man in the game and in the process tied LaMarcus Aldridge for the most double double by a member of the draft class of 2006.
Yet you "FANS" sit around complain, complain, complain/argue, argue, argue about whether he blew a defensive assignment or whether he or Marcus Williams is better...Williams having averaged 12 and 8 since Kidd left and has helped the Nets open up the offense.
Jesus Christ, does anyone here have ANY perspective...any at all. It appears not. These two kids were drafted #22 and #23.
Get a clue.</div>
The Magic announcers had nice things to say about Boone . . . although conceding that Dwight Howard was not a "boxer-outer," one of the more ridiculous things I've heard an announcer say recently. Anyway, they recognized that Josh was the Nets' best player on the floor; that he was playing Howard about as well as one can play Howard, and that the team seemed to flounder when he left the court.
Josh won't be a star, but that's the wrong standard to hold him to. Historically, the odds of a non-lottery big man becoming a solid rotation contributor are not very good, and Boone is clearly beating those odds. The fact that the Nets have potentially THREE non-lottery big men that are solid rotation guys is statistically improbable, and more than erases the Antoine Wright selection in my mind (especially since the Nets apparently were going to take McCants, and other than Granger, none of the other candidates have really lit it up).
</div>
lets not get crazy here, granger is an all star player in this league, was a potential lottery pick, and played the same position as wright while we draft wright, a scrub who will be out of the league soon. that mistake is still hurting the nets right now and will hurt them until they find a guy who can fill that role for the nets
Yet you "FANS" sit around complain, complain, complain/argue, argue, argue about whether he blew a defensive assignment or whether he or Marcus Williams is better...Williams having averaged 12 and 8 since Kidd left and has helped the Nets open up the offense.
Jesus Christ, does anyone here have ANY perspective...any at all. It appears not. These two kids were drafted #22 and #23.
Get a clue.</div>
The Magic announcers had nice things to say about Boone . . . although conceding that Dwight Howard was not a "boxer-outer," one of the more ridiculous things I've heard an announcer say recently. Anyway, they recognized that Josh was the Nets' best player on the floor; that he was playing Howard about as well as one can play Howard, and that the team seemed to flounder when he left the court.
Josh won't be a star, but that's the wrong standard to hold him to. Historically, the odds of a non-lottery big man becoming a solid rotation contributor are not very good, and Boone is clearly beating those odds. The fact that the Nets have potentially THREE non-lottery big men that are solid rotation guys is statistically improbable, and more than erases the Antoine Wright selection in my mind (especially since the Nets apparently were going to take McCants, and other than Granger, none of the other candidates have really lit it up).
</div>
lets not get crazy here, granger is an all star player in this league, was a potential lottery pick, and played the same position as wright while we draft wright, a scrub who will be out of the league soon. that mistake is still hurting the nets right now and will hurt them until they find a guy who can fill that role for the nets