crowTrobot
die comcast
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 4,597
- Likes
- 208
- Points
- 63
It's not really as big of a cost as you think though
i'm figuring luxury tax would double the difference in salary no later than 2011.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not really as big of a cost as you think though
Bosh isn't the primary re-bounder. They have O'Neal too you know. Besides that, I agree that rebounding really isn't an issue. That's not what he'd be brought here for though.
He's been injuredO'Neal isn't a starter. He only played 26:55 minutes today and notched 2 rebounds.
The reason he's better at this is because he's a better player than Aldridge. He's more adept in the low post, certainly a better back to the basket AND face up player than Aldridge. Plus he gets to the line more because he's a more aggressive player.
How many times have we seen Aldridge in a perfect position to penetrate, but decides to shoot a jumper or a fade away instead of taking it to the basket?
Getting free throws is also a key component to a winning team. Right now, only Roy and sometimes Bayless can get to the line consistently. You won't have to worry about that with Bosh. (It also helps that Bosh gets superstar calls from time to time)
Bosh isn't the primary re-bounder.
but I don't know if he can be consistently called on to score if he is unwilling to go to the basket and get free throws.
He's been injured
Whatever, it's not even an issue in Portland.
When the hell is the deadline anyways I'm getting antsy!!!
the more he says it, the less i agree with him.The more you say, the more I agree with you.
From what I understand, they are wanting to work Bargnani in as their center of the future.
all of that is true, but the differences in "adeptness" in those areas aren't as substantial as their reputations would indicate IMO. bosh is more aggressive, but a lot of the perceived difference in their abilities are due to bosh being the #1 option on his team and getting a lot more opportunities.
maybe not quite as much, but bosh is guilty of that a lot also. ask toronto fans.
I can't stress how much pressure would be put off of Roy's back if we were to obtain a second go to scorer.agreed that is bosh's primary advantage, but i doubt it's enough for the blazers to justify the cost.
Rebounding is a moot point though. Portland is a good enough rebounding team that the PF won't need to rebound as much. Even still, Bosh is a better rebounder than LA.he certainly is. o'neal might have been at least a "co"-primary rebounder if he could stay healthy, but he's missed 15 games and they've had to limit his minutes somewhat when he does play.
He doesn't need to be posted up to be able to get to the foul line. Facing up and driving is something that Bosh does so much more than Aldridge and it usually leads to an easy bucket or a foul.i think unwilling is overstating the difference. aldridge does get to the basket on a good percentage of his post-ups. we just don't call that many post-up plays for him.
Aldridge gets plenty of opportunities. This year, Aldridge is averaging 15 shots per game, and Bosh is averaging 16. What's accounts for the difference then, from Bosh's 23 PPG to Aldridge's 17.5? Free throws, and that's a whopping 6 points difference in the free throw department. Bosh is averaging 8.1 ftpg, whereas Aldridge is only average 3.8 per game. Plus, he converts them at a higher rate. (81% to 74%) That's a humongous difference which shows the difference in aggressiveness between both players. These numbers are even more in favor of Bosh if you want to look at the last couple of years.
Not nearly as guilty as Aldridge.
I can't stress how much pressure would be put off of Roy's back if we were to obtain a second go to scorer.
He doesn't need to be posted up to be able to get to the foul line. Facing up and driving is something that Bosh does so much more than Aldridge and it usually leads to an easy bucket or a foul.
again while there is a difference in aggressiveness to some extent i think it's being overstated. from what i've seen over the course of a typical game aldridge gets WAY less isolation plays called for him than bosh, and a much higher percentage of his shots come from pick/pops or other plays specifically designed to get him an open perimeter shot. also for some reason we frequently tend to go away from posting aldridge even when he's having success getting to the hoop.
Of course, but this is mainly because Bosh has less motivation to do well. His team is in serious jeopardy of missing the playoffs, and even if they do make it, they're just going to get bounced in the first round. The future in Toronto is much less bright than it is in Portland.i'll let you argue with toronto fans about that one. they seem to think that as good as bosh is he's still lazy at times.
Bosh is better right now. That's what I'm going off of. Will Aldridge get better? Probably, but his ceiling is most likely the current Chris Bosh. I'm going to take the proven product over the developing player.there's no reason to think aldridge won't work in that roll. right now if anything i think nate wants to share the ball too much, developing oden or showcasing outlaw or whatever.
for me it's a cost/benefit thing, and the cost is massive.
Aldridge can easily pass up an open shot and take an open lane to the basket (which he usually has). The facts and stats are there. If you choose to ignore them, then so be it.
Of course, but this is mainly because Bosh has less motivation to do well. His team is in serious jeopardy of missing the playoffs, and even if they do make it, they're just going to get bounced in the first round. The future in Toronto is much less bright than it is in Portland.
Bosh is better right now. That's what I'm going off of. Will Aldridge get better? Probably, but his ceiling is most likely the current Chris Bosh. I'm going to take the proven product over the developing player.
The cost is what, 5-6 million extra a year? That's really not a lot when you take into account the difference between the two players. (I'm going off of Aldridge/RLEC for Bosh) Bosh puts us at a much better position to win the championship, plain and simple.
Hmm, if it's true Toronto is willing to move him...Chris Bosh/Moon/Parker to Miami for Beasley and Marion? You heard it hear first...
Gross. I don't think Beasley has proven anything yet, and Marion is a FA.
Really? It makes sense for both teams, easily. I would do this trade if I was either one of them...
Toronto gets something back for Bosh saying he won't re-up.
Miami gets the obvious..making them instantly better IMO. Plus, what if LeBron wanted to sign with these guys in Miami?
Bosh is very good, but there's no guarantee he sticks around in Portland (same with LA, to some extent, but at least Aldridge has grown here the last few years). Messing with the main 3 is dangerous, too, because they all complement each other so well.
I wouldn't be upset if we traded Aldridge for Bosh in the lineup, but I wouldn't be all too happy about it either. LA's high post ability and willingness to defer to Roy/Outlaw/Oden bodes well for our future. Bosh has never had a chance to show that, true, but he would not be numero uno here and maybe in a year or two wouldn't be numero dos. Can he take that?
Also, I am definitely down on players who talk contract bullshit during the season...during a playoff push. Either keep quiet or deal with it in the offseason!
The cost is what, 5-6 million extra a year?
Well the bigger problem would be if before that happened, Ben Gordon bolted to New York...and then Bosh and Lebron followed him there the next summer. Damn Knicks. They'd be stealing Duhon, Gordon, and Bosh from the Bulls in consecutive summers. Just building their damn team with ex-Bulls. And of course sign Lebron James too, who aspires to be like a guy that used to play for the Bulls.
If I were the Knicks, I would want Bosh and LeBron, or Bosh and Wade. I'm not 100% sold that a Wade/LeBron team could win it all. Bosh and LeBron would be a lethal inside/out combo. How many teams have won (not counting the Bulls) without a dominant big man?

Maybe, maybe not. I'm guessing he's more tired of getting booed by his own fans when the team is trying to mount a fourth quarter comeback than he's worried about going to an immediate contender (although that wouldn't hurt).
If I was Chris Bosh, there's a lot to like about Chicago: a fairly strong history of fan support, a big market, a young stud point guard and a damn good front court mate in Luol Deng (assuming he's not part of the trade) and a chance to help build something in a new place.
I could see it happening and it working out.
Are you saying that KG isn't dominant? Or that he isn't big?
Either way, you are wrong on both counts. KG is a dominant big man.
What I am finding amazing right now is all of you think that Portland is a more attractive place than Toronto. What exactly makes you think he would be any more willing to re-sign here than Toronto? He may just be all about getting his player marketing to make his cash. He might not give a shit about winning at all. If that is the case, there would be no reason for him to come here. If it's not about Bosh making more cash, than he isn't interested.
What I am finding amazing right now is all of you think that Portland is a more attractive place than Toronto.

He has already re-signed once in Toronto, right? I get the feeling he can just see the Raptors heading in the wrong direction. I think he can get plenty of national exposure as a Trailblazer.
I still haven't seen a good comparative analysis of Bosh and Aldridge's games to show why it is that everyone thinks that Bosh is clearly better. Yes, he's a better rebounder. But he's a good deal shorter. Can he guard perimeter players, like Aldridge can? Is his jumper as good as Aldridge's is? Can he co-exist with Oden? (Has he ever played with a dominant center other than last Summer?)
Yes he scores a lot and is a good rebounder. That much he has in common with Zach Randolph (who outscores and outrebounds Aldridge too). What's SO great about him, exactly? I get the impression most people gushing about him haven't seen him play that much.
And yes he is a better rebounder
Relating Bosh to Randolph in any way shape or form is downright laughable, have you watched much of Bosh? These comments make me think you haven't.
