Brent Musberger senile?

[blazerboy30]

Don't be fooled by blazerboy30, he didn't even go to Stanford, let alone graduate. He just talks a lot of shit with a tree as his avatar. Be prepared for him to call me out and say I don't know shit about him, etc..., but him and I both know the truth.

Where did I go to school?

Stanford played a great game against us this year, but we'd beat them 8/10 times. And we should have played Alabama for the 'ship, that's the game everyone across the country wanted to see. Stanford/Alabama? Ummm, no.

Perfect example of another butthurt, self-entitled Laker... I mean, Duck fan.

 

[bigbailes]

Am I the only one that didn't see her as that unbelievably hot, I mean she's no Jenn Sterger? I guess Brent had to talk about something with the game such a snoozer but I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

As for UO vs Stan, those are the type of defenses that the ucks struggle with and I'm not sure they win 80% of the time, in Eugene yes but Stanford was a different team with Hogan under center. Then again, they shouldn't have lost the ND game either.

 

[The_Lillard_King]

Where did I go to school?



Perfect example of another butthurt, self-entitled Laker... I mean, Duck fan.

No one is butt hurt, most I think are frustrated because you come in here saying how you think Stanford could be number 2 and owns Oregon when Stanford has 2 losses (including a loss to UW) and barely beat Oregon.

And this argument that Stanford is now a differnt team so don't count those losses is a joke. Anyone who follows college football will tell you it doesn't work that way and you look at the whole season . . . which is why it is ridiculous you think Stanford could end up #2.

Using you analogy, I could have played quaterback on the Ducks and Oregon would have beaten UW.

 

[blazerboy30]

No one is butt hurt, most I think are frustrated because you come in here saying how you think Stanford could be number 2 and owns Oregon when Stanford has 2 losses (including a loss to UW) and barely beat Oregon.

And this argument that Stanford is now a differnt team so don't count those losses is a joke. Anyone who follows college football will tell you it doesn't work that way and you look at the whole season . . . which is why it is ridiculous you think Stanford could end up #2.

Using you analogy, I could have played quaterback on the Ducks and Oregon would have beaten UW.

Yes, many Duck fans here are indeed butthurt. It doesn't get any more butthurt than comments like "we should have played in the 'ship game". Should have? Like you're owed something? Let me guess... it was the refs' fault, right Laker fans?

I never said "don't count the losses". I said they were a completely different team after those losses with the new QB since people were bringing up the ND loss. You Oregon fans seem to think Stanford beating Oregon was a fluke because you watched Stanford's first half of the season when they really weren't impressive.

I'm not saying Stanford should be ranked #2, because we really did have 2 losses. But I think there is a real case for them being the second best team in the country. If I had to put money on the games at this point, I'd put my money on Stanford against KSU, Oregon, ND, Florida... everybody except Alabama.

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

Jim Norton ‏@JimNorton
I'm glad @ESPN apologized for Brent Musburger's VERY offensive compliments about the beauty of a beauty contest winner. A real guys network!

Good stuff!

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT A BEAUTIFUL WOMEN! Stop turning it into a college football thread!

 

[The_Lillard_King]

Yes, many Duck fans here are indeed butthurt. It doesn't get any more butthurt than comments like "we should have played in the 'ship game". Should have? Like you're owed something? Let me guess... it was the refs' fault, right Laker fans?

I never said "don't count the losses". I said they were a completely different team after those losses with the new QB since people were bringing up the ND loss. You Oregon fans seem to think Stanford beating Oregon was a fluke because you watched Stanford's first half of the season when they really weren't impressive.

I'm not saying Stanford should be ranked #2, because we really did have 2 losses. But I think there is a real case for them being the second best team in the country. If I had to put money on the games at this point, I'd put my money on Stanford against KSU, Oregon, ND, Florida... everybody except Alabama.

Well maybe you should make yourself more clear and you might get differnt responses. When someone asks you Why wasn't Stanford rated #2 to end the year? and you respond I actually think they have a case for being #2 at the end of the year. . . . at the very least that imples you think they could be rated #2 and really just flat out says you think there is an arguement for Stanford being rated #2.

If you want to clarify what you meant, I get that. (But I wonder what your response would have been if I said I actually think Oregon has a case for being #1 at the end of the year.) I personally just rolled my eyes but others, rightfully so, decided to fire back at such a silly comment.

The fact posters here think UO would have given a beter fight than ND is not being butt hurt, it's being a Oreogn fan. And I think UO should have played in the title game, IF they didn't shoot themselves in the foot against Stanford. As a duck fan, standford didn't win that game, the Ducks lost it. If that is being butthurt, OK.

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

 

[blazerboy30]

Well maybe you should make yourself more clear and you might get differnt responses. When someone asks you Why wasn't Stanford rated #2 to end the year? and you respond I actually think they have a case for being #2 at the end of the year. . . . at the very least that imples you think they could be rated #2 and really just flat out says you think there is an arguement for Stanford being rated #2.

Both are true. They have a case for being ranked #2 and a case for being the second best team in the country.

There is certainly a case for Stanford to be ranked higher than Oregon after beating them, and playing a MUCH more difficult schedule.

[/quote]

If you want to clarify what you meant, I get that. (But I wonder what your response would have been if I said I actually think Oregon has a case for being #1 at the end of the year.) I personally just rolled my eyes but others, rightfully so, decided to fire back at such a silly comment.

There is nothing to clarify. I stand by my original statement that a case can be made for Stanford being ranked #2 and the second best team in the country.

The fact posters here think UO would have given a beter fight than ND is not being butt hurt, it's being a Oreogn fan. And I think UO should have played in the title game, IF they didn't shoot themselves in the foot against Stanford. As a duck fan, standford didn't win that game, the Ducks lost it. If that is being butthurt, OK.

Yes, it certainly is.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

I actually think they have a case for being #2 at the end of the year.

I don't like making excuses, but did you see how incredibly bad our qb, Nunes, was for the first half of the year when we had our two losses? He was absolutely terrible. Stanford was winning despite him being at qb.

Stanford was a completely different team once Hogan got the start and playing time. There is little doubt they win both the UW and the ND losses with Hogan.

Shoulda coulda woulda. If Mannion doesn't get injured, maybe OSU continues their undefeated roll. If Roy and Oden stay healthy, we'd have 3 championships. You lost. We don't need your hy-pathetic-als!

The world and the media has spoken: Oregon is #2, ahead of Stanford. Get over it.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

I'm surprised that so many UO fans make it down to Palo Alto for the game. I didn't think Walmart would let so many of UO grads have the day off.

Oregon got beat this year the same way they lose every year. They aren't built to handle big, fast, physical defenses. When they face a big, fast, physical defense, the ducks in their little prissy, flashy, overhyped uniforms get manhandled by the real men. Just look at what has happened when Oregon has faced the physical, tough defenses of Auburn, LSU and Stanford lately.

If you had watched the games this year, you wouldn't have been surprised that Stanford's offense was actually legit once they replaced Nunes with Hogan at quarterback. That's unfortunate your team was dumb enough to "look at the 21 point spread" and not look at the actual team that was put on the field.

Super douche-baggery comment, here. You troll harder than the TimberTrolls. Congrats.

 

[The_Lillard_King]

Both are true. They have a case for being ranked #2 and a case for being the second best team in the country.

There is certainly a case for Stanford to be ranked higher than Oregon after beating them, and playing a MUCH more difficult schedule.

There is nothing to clarify. I stand by my original statement that a case can be made for Stanford being ranked #2 and the second best team in the country.




Yes, it certainly is.[/QUOTE]

Man you ar all over the map as you just said: I'm not saying Stanford should be ranked #2, because we really did have 2 losses. But I think there is a real case for them being the second best team in the country.

But big newsflash for you: if you think I'm butthurt with the those thoughts on the Stanford game, you got butthurt x2 for thinking Stanford lost the games because of thier quarterback situation. UW flat out beat Stanford which gives them no chance to be #2, stop being butthurt and giving excuses about the quarterback and get over it.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

Don't be fooled by blazerboy30, he didn't even go to Stanford, let alone graduate. He just talks a lot of shit with a tree as his avatar. Be prepared for him to call me out and say I don't know shit about him, etc..., but him and I both know the truth. Stanford played a great game against us this year, but we'd beat them 8/10 times. And we should have played Alabama for the 'ship, that's the game everyone across the country wanted to see. Stanford/Alabama? Ummm, no.

Doesn't bb30 have a hard-on for Zags and knocks Zags as a braggart? But yet, we constantly read bb30's chippy comments, knocking Oregonians down and raising himself up like he's royalty? Kinda ironic.

 

[blazerboy30]

Man you ar all over the map as you just said: I'm not saying Stanford should be ranked #2, because we really did have 2 losses. But I think there is a real case for them being the second best team in the country.

But big newsflash for you: if you think I'm butthurt with the those thoughts on the Stanford game, you got butthurt x2 for thinking Stanford lost the games because of thier quarterback situation. UW flat out beat Stanford which gives them no chance to be #2, stop being butthurt and giving excuses about the quarterback and get over it.

You don't understand the difference between "they should be ranked" and "a case can be made"? You clearly went to UofO.

 

[blazerboy30]

Shoulda coulda woulda. If Mannion doesn't get injured, maybe OSU continues their undefeated roll. If Roy and Oden stay healthy, we'd have 3 championships. You lost. We don't need your hy-pathetic-als!

The world and the media has spoken: Oregon is #2, ahead of Stanford. Get over it.

I am totally over it. Maybe read the thread before spouting off about your lack of comprehension?

The duck fan is the first one to start throwing out the "we should have seen an Alabama vs UofO championship game".

 

[blazerboy30]

Doesn't bb30 have a hard-on for Zags and knocks Zags as a braggart? But yet, we constantly read bb30's chippy comments, knocking Oregonians down and raising himself up like he's royalty? Kinda ironic.

Silly little guy... I'm an Oregonian myself. I went to OSU for undergrad. No need to feel inferior.

 

[PHXBlazer1]

Both are true. They have a case for being ranked #2 and a case for being the second best team in the country.

There is certainly a case for Stanford to be ranked higher than Oregon after beating them, and playing a MUCH more difficult schedule.

There is nothing to clarify. I stand by my original statement that a case can be made for Stanford being ranked #2 and the second best team in the country.




Yes, it certainly is.[/QUOTE]

The fact of the matter is, Oregon ended the season ranked #2. What was Stanford? Texas A&M beat Alabama, but did they end the season ranked ahead of the Tide? No. The people that make these rankings know a lot more about college football than you or I, right? I've yet to find any analyst that ranks Stanford ahead of Oregon, even though they beat us on that Saturday. Just like no one is ranking Texas A&M above Alabama even though they beat them. The Ducks are a better football team than Stanford. You can have your SAT scores (if you even went there)

 

[blazerboy30]

The fact of the matter is, Oregon ended the season ranked #2. What was Stanford? Texas A&M beat Alabama, but did they end the season ranked ahead of the Tide? No. The people that make these rankings know a lot more about college football than you or I, right? I've yet to find any analyst that ranks Stanford ahead of Oregon, even though they beat us on that Saturday. Just like no one is ranking Texas A&M above Alabama even though they beat them. The Ducks are a better football team than Stanford. You can have your SAT scores (if you even went there)

Really? You're using the same people that had ND ranked ahead of Alabama before the championship game?

Excellent logic. You got me there. There can certainly not be any discussion about the validity of the rankings by the people that "know a lot more".

 

[The_Lillard_King]

You don't understand the difference between "they should be ranked" and "a case can be made"? You clearly went to UofO.

We can split hairs all day, but the reality is the only people in the entire nation making this so called case for Stanford being #2 are Stanford fans . . . and I doubt most of them would say Stanford had a case.

If this was in a court, a judge would throw that case out!

 

[blazerboy30]

We can split hairs all day, but the reality is the only people in the entire nation making this so called case for Stanford being #2 are Stanford fans . . . and I doubt most of them would say Stanford had a case.

If this was in a court, a judge would throw that case out!

Right. Tell me about all of Oregon's wins against quality opponents this year.

 

[PHXBlazer1]

Really? You're using the same people that had ND ranked ahead of Alabama before the championship game?

Excellent logic. You got me there. There can certainly not be any discussion about the validity of the rankings by the people that "know a lot more".

Ya that's the logical comeback that I was expecting, but if you really went to Stanford you must be smart enough to know your argument holds no water. Notre Dame deserved to be there, because they went undefeated, playing a pretty tough schedule, including a win against Stanford.

There's a difference between deserving to be there and belonging there. Oregon belonged there. But Stanford beat us, and I give them credit. So we weren't there. That's college football. Oregon is the better team, and no one is argung that. Except you. You can make your case, but no one is buying it.

 

[speeds]

Between the frozen facial expression and heavy makeup she looks like a replica of a real person.

 

[blazerboy30]

Ya that's the logical comeback that I was expecting, but if you really went to Stanford you must be smart enough to know your argument holds no water. Notre Dame deserved to be there, because they went undefeated, playing a pretty tough schedule, including a win against Stanford.

There's a difference between deserving to be there and belonging there. Oregon belonged there. But Stanford beat us, and I give them credit. So we weren't there. That's college football. Oregon is the better team, and no one is argung that. Except you. You can make your case, but no one is buying it.

Ah, so the rankings only matter and make sense when it benefits Oregon. Gotcha.

There is no such thing as "deserved to be there", unless you're a butthurt Oregon fan. Should I go back and find your posts from previous years where you argued that and undefeated Boise St. should be ranked ahead of Oregon and first in the nation. Did you argue for that back then?

You Oregon fans are hilarious. It's like your entire life worth rests on the ducks football team. It's a lot like the high school athlete who has nothing else to rest his hat on so keeps telling his McDonald's coworkers about how he could have won the state championship.

 

[PHXBlazer1]

Ya you should go back and find my posts from previous years! Please do! It's too bad you can't get a job in this economy with your M.A. from Stanford. And you say you did your undergrad at OSU? Honestly that explains a lot and I'm gonna leave you alone after this post. You're a little Beaver fan masquerading as some Stanford doctor...it's a cute act! Go Ducks!

 

[blazerboy30]

Ya you should go back and find my posts from previous years! Please do! It's too bad you can't get a job in this economy with your M.A. from Stanford. And you say you did your undergrad at OSU? Honestly that explains a lot and I'm gonna leave you alone after this post. You're a little Beaver fan masquerading as some Stanford doctor...it's a cute act! Go Ducks!

It's ok, I know why you get so fired up over this topic. I'm sure you could have won the state championship if coach would have just given you a chance. Keep vicariously living through your ducks football, since you have nothing else. Uncle Rico, is that you?

 

[3RA1N1AC]

Uncle Rico? Is that the uncle who came up to your room during our slumber party?

 

[PHXBlazer1]

It's ok, I know why you get so fired up over this topic. I'm sure you could have won the state championship if coach would have just given you a chance. Keep vicariously living through your ducks football, since you have nothing else. Uncle Rico, is that you?

Shit, you got me. Fuckin Stanford kids are so smart, even the ones that went to Oregon State. Maybe next year you can make the Cotton Bowl!

 

[3RA1N1AC]

Stanford is damn good, 3 bcs games in a row...it can only help the conference to have another perennial top 5 team

 

[blazerboy30]

Shit, you got me. Fuckin Stanford kids are so smart, even the ones that went to Oregon State.

True.

 

[PHXBlazer1]

True.

I would have given up, too. Go Ducks!