bruins vs rangers

[Pastafazul]

will the rangers have repeat performance after loss to the oilers, this game no doubt has more meaning as far as points go...

guys better play with your heads up 2nite... and for the love of God, shadow lucic and blast him any chance you get.. and watch out for that sneaky marchand bastit..

lets go rangers

 

[Disturbed]

I think Rangers win tonight

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

JT showing patience on that breakaway

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[Pastafazul]

great speed there JT and BANG!!!!!!!!!!!!!


1-0

 

[Pastafazul]

rangers better pour it on

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Nice dive into the goalie by Dom Moore

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[Pastafazul]

man if i was rask i punch boychuk in the nose

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Did I hear boos after cally missed the net?

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Btw very happy to hear kenny albert calling this game

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[Ranger71]

Passing is Kreiders main weakness right now. Either he puts too much on it or is inaccurate.

 

[Disturbed]

Rangers look freaking great in this game. Keep it going

 

[NYNole28]

Rangers look freaking great in this game. Keep it going

Only one goal though to show for it. Not gonna be enough against this Boston team. Need to bury the puck in the net

 

[Disturbed]

Yep Nole we have seen this too many times. 1-1

 

[NYNole28]

Only one goal though to show for it. Not gonna be enough against this Boston team. Need to bury the puck in the net

Told you.

 

[chuckd3534]

And there is the issue right there. The fact that we dominated the period means NOTHING now.

That is why the Bruins beat us. They just pound us in the corners.

 

[NYNole28]

So frustrating. Dominate a team for a whole period, unable to put the puck in the net and that leads to a loss (not saying we lose this game, but that seems to be the blueprint for us the past few seasons.

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Dominate? Because of number of shots? Yeah 20 in goal how many were great scoring chances?

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[chuckd3534]

A bunch of them Al. Not sure what game you were watching.

Anyway, we clearly played well in that period. But it doesn't mean much with the score tied at 1. We'll see how the 2nd goes.

 

[Disturbed]

Nole games not over. Prob should be up 3-1 but they will be fine

 

[NYNole28]

Dominate? Because of number of shots? Yeah 20 in goal how many were great scoring chances?

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

We're you watching the game? Puck was predominantly in the Boston zone for the period. We were getting the puck outta our zone rather quickly and easily. Boston wasn't getting their cycle set up, we were getting our cycle set up. So yes, we did dominate that period, even if we only had 5 shots on goal. We controlled play in that period.

 

[Disturbed]

And they were not just shooting in Rasks pads either. They were going to the net. Score sucks but I like what I have seen so far

 

[NYNole28]

Nole games not over. Prob should be up 3-1 but they will be fine

Game def isn't over and if we play the next two periods that well we should win. But you know what they say about shoulda and coulda.

 

[Pastafazul]

its amazing, 20 freekin shots 1 goal , look dominant, make 1 mistake and they score... how bout a little LUCK for the rangers!!!!

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

I didnt see much panic in the Boston zone by the Bruins. All that domination and it was a breakaway that led go the only goal.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[NYNole28]

I didnt see much panic in the Boston zone by the Bruins. All that domination and it was a breakaway that led go the only goal.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Boston not panicking doesn't mean that we didn't control play in their zone. Boston isn't a team that panics. Not that type of team. And yes, only goal came off a breakaway, which is why I said it was disappointing that we couldn't score more.

 

[chuckd3534]

And we had a couple of great chances on top of that. Nash down low. Kreider down low. Miller had two other good chances. So did Cally on the PP.

Again, not sure what game you were watching Al, but we had many good chances and totally out played them. Score tied at 1 though, so the game starts over in the 2nd.

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Dominating would be up the goals. As see one little hiccup and the pick in or net.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[Ranger71]

I don't think the Rangers have ever had a two goal lead on Boston.

 

[NYNole28]

Dominating would be up the goals. As see one little hiccup and the pick in or net.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

So you didn't watch the game. Ok. Dominating does NOT always equal to goals when a team can't finish properly, like this team can't. The chances were there quite a bit, but as usual, they couldn't finish. Score is not always indicative of how a game is going. That's like using +/- to say how good a player is and use to solely evaluate his value to a team.

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

I did watch the game. One goal. ..yuppie.. great shooting percentage... no morale victories. ..need goals

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk