Buh Bye Shawne Williams

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
127,017
Likes
147,627
Points
115
Sam Amick ‏@sam_amick Portland has finalized the buyout agreement with F Shawne Williams, per source. He was owed $3.1 million next season & joins free agent pool
 
So does this increase our cap space by the difference in what was owed and what the buyout was?
 
So does this increase our cap space by the difference in what was owed and what the buyout was?

Yes and Shawne Williams jerseys are now half price at the Blazer fan store.

Win-win!
 
So it should add an extra 1. something to the available money?
 
So does this increase our cap space by the difference in what was owed and what the buyout was?

Yes I belive that has always been the case... I wonder what his buyout was for?

We could've cut him and stretched his salary over 3 years saving cap room this offseason. But that would've possibly put us in a bad luxury tax position in 2 years with a harsh punitive tax so I'm glad instead he will be wiped from the books after this season.
 
Yes I belive that has always been the case... I wonder what his buyout was for?

We could've cut him and stretched his salary over 3 years saving cap room this offseason. But that would've possibly put us in a bad luxury tax position in 2 years with a harsh punitive tax so I'm glad instead he will be wiped from the books after this season.

If they stretch amnestied him it would give Portland about 2 million more in cap room
 
Now, Portland can match Batum whenever, and still have enough to sign Hibbert.
 
Well, with the departure of Williams and Okur before him, this ushers in a new era in Blazerland. The team will have a whole different look next season.

barfo
 
Not sure. How much was Hibberts max offer for in year 1?

12.9 in the first year.

Though I read somewhere a comment about how Minnesota would have to waive Webster and Brad Miller to sign Batum to an offer sheet, and that they would have to clear waivers before they can use the space. So I believe the issue of timing, well, isn't an issue.
 
12.9 in the first year.

Though I read somewhere a comment about how Minnesota would have to waive Webster and Brad Miller to sign Batum to an offer sheet, and that they would have to clear waivers before they can use the space. So I believe the issue of timing, well, isn't an issue.

Isn't it only a 48 hour waiver period? All they'd really have to do is waive them by the 9th, no?
 
Isn't it only a 48 hour waiver period? All they'd really have to do is waive them by the 9th, no?

but with a moratorium on signings, I would imagine claiming someone on waivers would fall under a signing, so I would think they'd have to wait until the 11th, or rather the waivers wouldn't start until then. I could be wrong.
 
but with a moratorium on signings, I would imagine claiming someone on waivers would fall under a signing, so I would think they'd have to wait until the 11th, or rather the waivers wouldn't start until then. I could be wrong.
Well now I have to tweet Jeff and ask
 
The stretch provision takes the amount owed (in this case, 3.135M) and splits it evenly over 3 years. This happens anyway in paying out the cash for 2011 CBA buyouts, but teams can choose to have the cap hit over the original contract length, or 2x the OCL plus one. So in Williams' case, the Blazers can either keep 3.135M on the cap for this year, and be done, or have to have 1.045M each year over the next 3 on their cap. So if they did that, we would have an extra 2.090M under the cap.

The 12.9M max number assumes a 58.0M cap number. Most analysts are saying it's going to be around 61-61.5M, which would make a max offer to Hibbert start at 13.6M or so.
 
The stretch provision takes the amount owed (in this case, 3.135M) and splits it evenly over 3 years. This happens anyway in paying out the cash for 2011 CBA buyouts, but teams can choose to have the cap hit over the original contract length, or 2x the OCL plus one. So in Williams' case, the Blazers can either keep 3.135M on the cap for this year, and be done, or have to have 1.045M each year over the next 3 on their cap. So if they did that, we would have an extra 2.090M under the cap.

The 12.9M max number assumes a 58.0M cap number. Most analysts are saying it's going to be around 61-61.5M, which would make a max offer to Hibbert start at 13.6M or so.

We have moved on to moratoriums
 
Most analysts are saying it's going to be around 61-61.5M, which would make a max offer to Hibbert start at 13.6M or so.

Where did you hear about that? I thought I heard maximum salaries are temporarily a bit higher in terms of percentage of the cap, but they will go back to the permanente % rates in a year or two. So this coming season the max contracts are the amount from a $61million cap but the actual cap is staying the same as last year at $58 million since revenue didn’t go up.

But I don’t really know I’ve heard a lot of stuff, it’s Friday and my head hurts.
 
If they stretch amnestied him it would give Portland about 2 million more in cap room

And it would add the identical "about 2 million" on to the cap half in 2013-14 and half in 2014-15. Then those years have a punitive luxury tax. I would've only considered stretching Williams if that additional cap room this off-season was a worthwhile difference.

But if the team got a reduction from this buyout perhaps the team has some of the advantages of both scenarios.
 
they've been saying 60-61M since November, but this week the 61.5 number was thrown around for the first time.

I'll try to dig up the articles...I don't think I would've trusted tweets on this one, but I've been reading a lot of NBA B.S. recently...
 
And it would add the identical "about 2 million" on to the cap half in 2013-14 and half in 2014-15. Then those years have a punitive luxury tax. I would've only considered stretching Williams if that additional cap room this off-season was a worthwhile difference.

But if the team got a reduction from this buyout perhaps the team has some of the advantages of both scenarios.

From everything I've read (and I haven't seen anything today), Williams wasn't going to take a penny less than what he was owed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top