Bush to use nuclear weapons to stop Iran?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
BrewCityBuck

BrewCityBuck

The guy with 17,000 Posts.
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
17,503
Likes
0
Points
36
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml...xportaltop.htmlMr Bush and others in the White House view him as a potential Adolf Hitler, a former senior intelligence official told Hersh. "That's the name they're using. They say, 'Will Iran get a strategic weapon and threaten another world war?' "Despite America's public commitment to diplomacy, there is a growing belief in Washington that the only solution to the crisis is regime change. A senior Pentagon consultant said that Mr Bush believes that he must do "what no Democrat or Republican, if elected in the future, would have the courage to do," and "that saving Iran is going to be his legacy". OMG...Seymour Hersh is one who uncovered the Abu Grahb scandel...he's very credable...if this is true...OMG.
sad.gif
 
I don't see how President Bush could get the support of using such a weapon on Iran right now. If he really wanted to do use it he would have done it right after 9/11 when he had the support of the nation and congress.They are talking about using nuclear "bunker busting" bombs but those aren't even close to the A-Bomb.
 
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was not President when 9/11 happened, he was just elected last summer, Iran was not a problem until this guy was elected.
 
Well, the talk about Bush using nuclear weapons has dated back to the War in Iraq and even the War on Terror. Bush has wanted to use bunker busting bombs for awhile.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Waqas @ Apr 13 2006, 09:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I hope Iran wins, whatever happens.</div> :brucelee: 🦇
angry.gif
 
Another reason why i despise America. Who are they to decide which country can have nuclear weapons and which can't? Who the <Censored> they think they are? When their great ally in Israel has nuclear weapons and no muslim country can have them unless they are puppets of the US [pakistan].I really believe their is a major conspiracy going on and this nuclear bombs buisness is just a reason to help their cause. There on a mission to reshape the middle east, to install pro american goverments and control the oil flow.Don't think this is the end, America is going to go after syria then lybia and any other regime which isn't a puppet.
 
I read a very good article yesterday that was against the American stance on this issue... it also brought about a great fact. Iran is still 10 years away from being able to have enough uranium to make a nuclear bomb...I'll post the article here if I can find it again.
 
Iran 10 years away? It depends on who you talk to. Some say 2 years some say 10.
 
Why are you guys about when there going to develop it? The real question is who gave the US the right to determine who can have nuclear bombs and who can't.This is all assuming that Iran does indeed want to develop bombs just like Iraq had stockpiles of bombs
rolleyes.gif
.I have to admit, people are naive.
 
Half my family is in Iran... <Censored>. That Ahmadinejad guy...no one really wanted him to win but he sort of won. The president over there has 0 power anyway. I keep thinking about those conspiracy theories as stuff like this comes up.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BCB @ Apr 15 2006, 08:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Iran 10 years away? It depends on who you talk to. Some say 2 years some say 10.</div>True...<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clutch_Melo_061 @ Apr 15 2006, 08:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Why are you guys about when there going to develop it? The real question is who gave the US the right to determine who can have nuclear bombs and who can't.This is all assuming that Iran does indeed want to develop bombs just like Iraq had stockpiles of bombs
rolleyes.gif
.I have to admit, people are naive.</div>I agree 100%.
 
A great majority of the nations have nuclear weapon programs, not just the United States and our allies. Who says who can have nukes and who can't? The United Nations does. It's just a fact that the United States is a part of the U.N. and often is the single body who enforces the sanctions and policies that the U.N. has.I don't know about you, but I don't want guys like Saddam, Kim Jong and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad having their paws on nuclear weapons. There are certain guys who the United Nations (which is a collection of nations) does not allow to have certain weapons.Get your facts straight and stop blaming America for everything.
 
This seems pointless to use Nukes on them.Yes we need to stop them from building it but what can they do with it? NOTHING.They dont have the air crafts to travel all the way to the US to do something. Even if they did they would have to fly over Asia which we would find out about.They cant do anything with them.
 
<Censored> this man, Bush would be a hypycrot and this wont make him have a good legacy, the whole war on Iraq was mainly because of the nucleur weapons but he's going to use them here. and if they do this, other countries around the world may attack the US in anger with nucleur weapons also. so <Censored> this im worried about the safety here. and i live in NY a likely target for any terrorist attack.
 
These freaking morons that are running this country are gonna bring about the end of the world. Do they honestly think, that if we use nukes, another country wont use em on us? Thats basically the end of the world right there, one country sends one one way, the other sends it our way and then the radiation kills every1 else. I dont understand what gives the US the idea that we have the right to use nukes or own nukes and every other country cannot. its this stupid political <Censored> that comes in the way of more important issues. our country spends billions of dollars on the military and we hardly spend anything on more important things like saving the environment or helping the underprivledged or providing free health care. IMPEACH BUSH!!!!!!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BALLAHOLLIC @ Apr 19 2006, 12:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This seems pointless to use Nukes on them.Yes we need to stop them from building it but what can they do with it? NOTHING.They dont have the air crafts to travel all the way to the US to do something. Even if they did they would have to fly over Asia which we would find out about.They cant do anything with them.</div> Huh? You can shoot nuclear missles anywhere in the world, we can hit any spot in the world from our country for example. Iran would never nuke anyone (possibly Israel) because it would end Iran as we know it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Huh? You can shoot nuclear missles anywhere in the world, we can hit any spot in the world from our country for example.Iran would never nuke anyone (possibly Israel) because it would end Iran as we know it.</div>They dont have the missles to do that though. The ones they do have will not reach us.The only way for them to get ahold of those missles is either China or Russia. If we find out they are selling them to Iran there will be problems.I agree with there Attack on Israel but in order to get there they have to cross Jordan which I dont see it being an easy task.
 
Israel is but we are NOT.I agree Israel would be there first target. Israel would own Iran if they did that though.
 
Iran is no threat to us now but in how many years will they be? It's obvious that they don't plan on stopping anytime soon. They will improve their weapons until it does reach us.It's called a pre-emptive strike.
 
Come on, they are not going to go shooting nukes off, the media is giving that impression and nobody seems to be smart enough to understand MAD...eh.
 
If one nuclear weapon is fired then it will set off a chain reaction ultimately resulting in nuclear winter and the possible extinction of the human race, I don't see this happening.
 
I doubt it starts a nuclear world war...If Iran shot one into Israel, Israel would respond and that would probably end it...Countries even in crisis would seriously have to consider each move. Nukes are used for show and tell more than a weapon.
 
No, they're used to balance power. It's like we have nukes and you do too, so we have no advantage. But if we have them and you don't then we have a large advantage, so you better get some so that none of us have to use them. Also, I would think that we would interfere because Israel is our ally, and other countries would come to Iran's aid in an attempt to obliterate Israel once an for all, I think it would cause quite a mess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top