Harry's Raincoat
Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 926
- Likes
- 620
- Points
- 93
LaRue Martin easily. It's not even close. If you choose someone else your either too young or you don't follow the history of the team very closely.
This makes me feel really old, but tlongII is absolutely correct; you have to look at the whole history of the team, and you have to look at the decision based upon information available on the day of the draft, not hindsight, injuries, contracts, etc..
The answer is LaRue Martin. He played one fantastic game against Bill Walton and UCLA and it gave him a great reputation on the West Coast. We also knew or had been told that McAdoo and Erving wouldn't play for us, and would opt for the ABA if selected. We panicked.
Bowie was the consensus second-best rated big man in 1984. We had just lost the coin flip for getting to draft #1 (Akeem). Yes, in hindsight, drafting Jordan, Barkley, even Perkins would have worked out better (depending on fate/luck). However, we thought we were one big man away from deep playoff contention with our team of All-Star Paxson, All-Star Kiki and emerging Drexler. Drafting Martell (and Jack) instead of at #3, looks bad today, but it also allowed us to remain a bad team longer and because of it we ended up getting Roy, Aldridge and Oden later on. That all may have changed had we taken either DWill or CP3.
My final free lesson of the day is that Chamberlain is the GREATEST NBA PLAYER ever, not Jordan. Wilt, averaged 50 pts per game for a season. Wilt scored 100 pts in a game. The league changed rules to prevent Wilt from dominating more than he did. They did the opposite for Jordan (hand checking, defensive zone rules, etc.). Wilt just happened to play most of his career during the Celtics 15 year Dynasty. Jordan wouldn't have sniffed the Finals if he'd played during that time or against the 80's Lakers/Celtics era.
Last edited:

