Interesting logic. A guy is successful, leaves, the team then sucks, and so that doesn't show he was good--that shows he left a "legacy" that forced the team to get worse after his ouster, so it's HIS fault. Okay, I see...Strange they were doing fine till he left, then a couple of years later became the worst team in the league...Right, it's his fault...Many businesses borrow money, so what. The next CEO has to have the talent to sustain the business, not cry about it as you do. Does Obama just give up because of what he inherited?
So you think that every failed moment in history can be blamed on the successful preceding moment, because it set up the failure. Is the Vietnam War the fault of George Washington? Is the Libya War the fault of the dinosaurs for becoming extinct?