The original post was difficult to parse with BF's inline comments combined the author's own words and his parenthetical comments. I think those critiquing her post were just letting her know that a different format may make it more readable.
I actually clicked on the link to read the unmodified original and then came back to her post to read her comments. That worked, but I think just quoting the original, followed by her comments would have been easier to parse. I'm not suggesting she dumb down her commentary, just present it in a format others will find easier to read (like Natebisho3, I prefer the tags - helps break things up into easy digested thought bites). The whole point of starting a thread is to present your opinions an solicit others to respond, whether they agree or disagree. That's the lifeblood of online discussion groups. So, the more people read your post, the richer the ensuing discussion.
Personally, I think it's going to come down to Stotts and Vogel. And, while I will be pulling for Stotts, I think if the Pacers end up with the best record in the league, COY will go to Vogel. I've liked him ever since the Pacers lost to the Bulls in the first round three years ago. I loved the way the Pacers played team ball at both ends of the court and Vogel and Thibs both gave great, insightful post game interviews during that series.
BNM
I screwed up I guess, but I fixed it, maybe. lol
