Championship: Huevonkiller vs. DynastYWarrioR6

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Champion?

  • Huevonkiller

    Votes: 26 53.1%

  • DynastYWarrioR6

    Votes: 23 46.9%
  • Total voters
    49
  • Poll closed .

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
huevonkiller said:
Hm, use common sense. I'm talking about people like Celtic Fan who love Iverson's career totals over someone like Paul.
Click to expand...

CF is a smart man. Iverson was a stud back in the day, and he still is, but a very declined him (age kills).
 
huevonkiller said:
The back-up who sees what, 12 minutes a game max as a SG?
Click to expand...

And you are assuming that just cause Monroe is starting means that he'll play majority of the game? You know what assumptions do?

Monroe is a great sparkplug to start games with, a stabilizer like Wilkens is where crunchtime comes into play.

Think of Monroe with that starting lineup like Blitzkrieg.
 
DynastYWarrioR6 said:
And you are assuming that just cause Monroe is starting means that he'll play majority of the game? You know what assumptions do?

Monroe is a great sparkplug to start games with, a stabilizer like Wilkens is where crunchtime comes into play.

Think of Monroe with that starting lineup like Blitzkrieg.
Click to expand...

Do what you want with your backcourt, I'm good over here. 8d
 
huevonkiller said:
I guess Assist turnover ratio doesn't count, only turnovers?

Huh? Nice job selecting one of the stats that wasn't taken into account back in the day. And tell me how these TO's are uncommon for the stars in the league.
Click to expand...

Strawman....you wanted me to educate you on how they force stuff, so I took the TO's from their career years. That's also the problem, you have all stars that will just be a lot of 1-on-1 play rather than great ball movement. Since you don't have ball movement, you team wouldn't be as great as you're playing it off to be. It'd be full of TO's and frustration of people not getting their shots and a lot of complaining. So please lecture me with the 80 shot breakdown that you're avoiding and tell me why you think it would work :clap:
 
J_Ray said:
Strawman....you wanted me to educate you on how they force stuff, so I took the TO's from their career years. That's also the problem, you have all stars that will just be a lot of 1-on-1 play rather than great ball movement. Since you don't have ball movement, you team wouldn't be as great as you're playing it off to be. It'd be full of TO's and frustration of people not getting their shots and a lot of complaining. So please lecture me with the 80 shot breakdown that you're avoiding and tell me why you think it would work :clap:
Click to expand...

It is pure fact Turnovers per game wasn't measured for a variety of old guys.

If anything I have better movement on my team, Robinson averaged almost 5 APG once in this slower league, and my PG initiates the offense better.

My team has amazing ball movement, how doesn't it? VC has a better assist-turnover ratio than various stars, and how did you show my guys turn the ball over more than usual or at a ridiculous rate?
 
Last edited:
Hell as a SG Iverson takes way too many damn shots still. I'd love to have Paul/VC/Pierce over him.
 
Also....Monroe's TS% was at 51.7%
MJ was at 56.9%
Pippen was at 53.6%

I only supplied MJ and Scottie so that people can use that as a gauge.

It really isn't as bad as you make it sound.
 
I can't believe this is even a contest...Huevon's team is superior. That bench is...just..wow..
 
huevonkiller said:
It is pure fact Turnovers per game wasn't measured for a variety of old guys.

If anything I have better movement on my team, Robinson averaged almost 5 APG once in this slower league, and my PG initiates the offense better.

My team has amazing ball movement, how doesn't it? VC has a better assist-turnover ratio than various stars, and how did you show my guys who turn the ball over more than usual or at a ridiculous rate?
Click to expand...

Yeah but the point is he doesn't have a bunch of big time scorers like you have, he has guys that fit together. We're not even talking about his team though, we're talking about your team. You wanted to know why your team would have 10 TO's in a 90 possession game and I was showing you why. Robinson had 4.8 assists once, he wasn't a Vlade Divac in terms of ball movement because of 1 season. Just means he was finding guys off of double teams because he was so dominant compared to C's at that time, he never had to face bigs like DW has. You are also talking about a Robinson, VC, Paul, and whoever else you pick from your team that had the offense ran through them, not them being a secondary guy. So just answer my original question of how you would split up 80 shots.
 
Black Mamba said:
I can't believe this is even a contest...Huevon's team is superior. That bench is...just..wow..
Click to expand...

Would be a contest if you knew who were on my bench. Also if it mattered to anyone that there are better players than those that we get to see on TV nowadays.
 
Lets be honest here: A lot of you people are a little envious of Huevon because of how he got here and who he beat.

Factor in the fact that he is a Laker fan (so is Dynasty); and you're just not going to give him the easy victory.

Huevon's team = Superior.
 
David Robinson. Dwight Howard. Amare Stoudamire. End it.
 
DynastYWarrioR6 said:
Would be a contest if you knew who were on my bench. Also if it mattered to anyone that there are better players than those that we get to see on TV nowadays.
Click to expand...

And you made it to the finals based on the reputation of MJ/Scottie. Huevon's team is just flat out better than yours.
 
Black Mamba said:
Lets be honest here: A lot of you people are a little envious of Huevon because of how he got here and who he beat.

Factor in the fact that he is a Laker fan (so is Dynasty); and you're just not going to give him the easy victory.

Huevon's team = Superior.
Click to expand...

Let's be honest here. I like Huevon more than any of his opponents. And he is a Laker fan like me.

But here, being a Laker fan means jackshit in this.
 
Black Mamba said:
And you made it to the finals based on the reputation of MJ/Scottie. Huevon's team is just flat out better than yours.
Click to expand...

Um, that may be the case because voters stopped looking AFTER MJ and Scottie (Not something I intended). Same way that people didn't look at the other team Huevon was facing cause of the MODERN names on his.
 
DynastYWarrioR6 said:
Let's be honest here. I like Huevon more than any of his opponents. And he is a Laker fan like me.

But here, being a Laker fan means jackshit in this.
Click to expand...

You sound a little hurt? You seem to be taking this a little too serious. So I beg to ask you the question...

WHY SO SERIOUS !?!

574.gif
 
cpawfanS2 (1:41:53 AM): just tell him that vince is a mentally weak little baby that would be intimidated by MJ
 
Black Mamba said:
You sound a little hurt? You seem to be taking this a little too serious. So I beg to ask you the question...

WHY SO SERIOUS !?!

http://www.creepygif.com/images/full/574.gif
Click to expand...

Sorry, I get like this. I like to win and compete til the end. Not out of disrespect or anything cause once this is over, it's just over. But so long as I have a reason and the ability to compete, I will.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top