Chemistry renewed.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

KingSpeed

Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
63,348
Likes
22,524
Points
113
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/12/portland_102_indiana_91_a_retu.html

Look at these quotes. Subtext: life is easier without Greg in the offense:

"They showed tonight they are our go-to guys. I don't like going back to last year, but that's how we won last year -- them putting us on their shoulders." - Joel Przybilla

"Tonight, it kind of went back to last year. It was like we took turns. We used to always joke that I get it going in the first (quarter), then he gets it in the fourth." - LaMarcus Aldridge
 
And from Roy at NBA.com: "Me and him, we definitely are starting to get into our old rhythm that we had last year."
 
I'm probably the biggest Oden defender out there, but I honestly think Roy and LMA can with a championship together, without Oden. Of course we'd need all the other guys, and a healthy Oden probably translates into MORE titles.
 
Of course it's easier without Oden. They're used to playing without Oden. It's difficult to implement what was essentially a whole new offense without some bumps in the road. The Blazers were actually trying to use Oden as an offensive weapon. Roy and Aldridge have never played with a center who could be considered an offensive threat. They were used to Joel, who rarely scores, and almost never has a play run through him. The problem is, eventually Oden is going to have to be worked into the offense. Not this season, obviously, but hopefully next season.
 
The team may have had trouble working around Greg at times, but they were putting it together. The level of play with Greg after 40 games would be higher than the level of play without Greg after 40 games (even if everyone else was healthy).
 
Having no offensive low post presence isn't how I want to go about these next couple of years.
 
I'm probably the biggest Oden defender out there, but I honestly think Roy and LMA can with a championship together, without Oden. Of course we'd need all the other guys, and a healthy Oden probably translates into MORE titles.

So how exactly did we get our asses kicked in the first round last year?

This team, even with everyone else back, is not going anywhere so long as Oden's injured. We may be perennially good but not championship material.
 
I won't deny the offense runs better right now without Oden, but honestly I think a lot of the blame has to fall on Brandon for being selfish, pouting, and not wanting to change. I love Brandon, but nobody is perfect. I think he could have tried much harder to play his game and make it work with Greg and Miller, but instead refused to change, wasn't nearly as aggressive to prove a point, and is now falling back to what he finds comfortable. Ultimately, this is Brandon's team though, and I most definitely want him as our leader, so if he really doesn't want to play with Oden as part of the offense, I'm at a loss as to what to do.
 
I won't deny the offense runs better right now without Oden, but honestly I think a lot of the blame has to fall on Brandon for being selfish, pouting, and not wanting to change. I love Brandon, but nobody is perfect. I think he could have tried much harder to play his game and make it work with Greg and Miller, but instead refused to change, wasn't nearly as aggressive to prove a point, and is now falling back to what he finds comfortable. Ultimately, this is Brandon's team though, and I most definitely want him as our leader, so if he really doesn't want to play with Oden as part of the offense, I'm at a loss as to what to do.

My opinion is that all talk of BRoy being selfish and unwilling to play with Oden should be put on hold until August 2010...
 
My opinion is that all talk of BRoy being selfish and unwilling to play with Oden should be put on hold until August 2010...

But don't you find it ironic that all the blame was going on Miller, and now that Oden is gone, Roy is playing fine?
 
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2009/12/portland_102_indiana_91_a_retu.html

Look at these quotes. Subtext: life is easier without Greg in the offense:

"They showed tonight they are our go-to guys. I don't like going back to last year, but that's how we won last year -- them putting us on their shoulders." - Joel Przybilla

"Tonight, it kind of went back to last year. It was like we took turns. We used to always joke that I get it going in the first (quarter), then he gets it in the fourth." - LaMarcus Aldridge


That's all well and good for "now", but this team goes nowhere in the playoffs unless we become a more balanced offense with other consistently viable threats. Yes it might be "easy" to go back to last year, and with the injuries we don't have much other choice, buy if you are looking to the Future it will not pay long term dividends. And lets consider just how awful a team we barely beat last night.
 
Last edited:
I won't deny the offense runs better right now without Oden, but honestly I think a lot of the blame has to fall on Brandon for being selfish, pouting, and not wanting to change. I love Brandon, but nobody is perfect. I think he could have tried much harder to play his game and make it work with Greg and Miller, but instead refused to change, wasn't nearly as aggressive to prove a point, and is now falling back to what he finds comfortable. Ultimately, this is Brandon's team though, and I most definitely want him as our leader, so if he really doesn't want to play with Oden as part of the offense, I'm at a loss as to what to do.


Most of the blame goes to the coaching staff for not designing an offensive strategy that better incorporates Oden and selling that to the other players like Roy and LMA. Of course there is going to be an adjustment period but you don't improve without some struggles, keeping the ultimate goal of getting better and having a winning formula in the playoffs.
 
What scares me is that we may see both management and Roy struggling through early playoff exits for 3 or 4 years before it finally clicks that if they want any legitimate shot at a championship then Oden has to be involved. Its almost like when you see you kids go through something the hard way and you try to advise them that there is an easier way but in the end they have to go through it and learn the lesson for themselves.

How many "superstars" and managements went through this pattern before they fianlly got it? Not all of them, but quite a few.
 
Those quotes are really scary, and sad.

Brandon, LaMarcus and the coaching staff need to understand that this team will not be able to take the next step with this offense.


Playing like last year will get our asses booted out of the playoffs early again.
 
Perhaps we can not get our asses handed to us by the Knicks and not have Indiana take us down to the last 3 minutes before we start sucking Brandon and LMA's popsicles for being able to go back to the offense that ensured Roy's "summer training" started early last year.
 
Those quotes are really scary, and sad.

Brandon, LaMarcus and the coaching staff need to understand that this team will not be able to take the next step with this offense.


Playing like last year will get our asses booted out of the playoffs early again.

Its amazing, is it really that hard to figure out? Wow
 
Congratulations Blazers, you beat the 6-13 Pacers without Danny Grainger. Without Oden we are getting killed on the offensive glass and settling for a ton of jumpers. But as long as our "Big 2" are happy then all is well I guess.

"It's a good win for us," said Brandon Roy.

How about beating some teams with winning records before dropping that quote?
 
Once again, what Eric sees as a huge positive I see as a huge red flag. Nate fucked up by not trying to integrate Greg into the offense from the start of training camp and also fucked up by not trying to find a way to put his five best players on the floor, namely his "big" free agent signing of the summer, instead he told Greg to play defense and rebound, and Miller to run the so-called "second unit." To me is this as much about lack of imagination and creativity on offense and inflexibility as it is about recapturing some old way of playing.

Last night, that was a Baaaaaaaaaaaaaad Pacers team, minus it's only go to scorer and was no great defensive squad to begin with, and we were dead-locked with a few minutes to play. This emerging meme that Greg was the problem is fucking bullshit and I'm sick of hearing it.
 
Last edited:
Once again, what Eric sees as a huge positive I see as a huge red flag. Nate fucked up by not trying to integrate Greg into the offense from the start of training camp and also fucked up by not trying to find a way to put his five best players on the floor, namely his "big" free agent signing of the summer, instead he told Greg to play defense and rebound, and Miller to run the so-called "second unit." To me is is as much about lack of imagination and creativity on offense and inflexibility as it is about recapturing some old way of playing.

Last night, that was a Baaaaaaaaaaaaaad Pacers team, minus it's only go to scorer and was no great defensive squad to begin with, and we were dead-locked with a few minutes to play. This emerging meme that Greg was the problem is fucking bullshit and I'm sick of hearing it.

I know, I feel really weird as we won the game but I just have this bad taste in my mouth about this team and how we play and who we play. I don't know if its me or others also feel that way. Just weird
 
The offense was smooth as silk against the Knicks. Thank God Oden wasn't there.

It's unbelievable, too, how the offense was so impressive in the blowout win against the mighty Pacers.

Oden left just in time!

Ed O.
 
I'm encouraged actually...

John Wall will be a Blazer by the end of June :)
 
It sounds like LA was pouting over not getting the ball to start the game. Roy was pouting about not having the ball in his hands. If Joel all of a sudden starts hustling and playing like last year, we will know he was pouting about not starting. It sounds like Blake was our only happy starter.
 
We'll see how our boys look in Cleveland tomorrow night. Why Indiana let Brandon Roy and Lamarcus Alridge beat them is beyond me - I guess that's why they are Indiana. The Blazers have two guys that can score of the 9 they suit up these days - most teams are going to make the other 7 guys try and win the game. Roy is going to get more defensive attention now than he's ever seen. Who else do you have to worry about? Webster? Blake? Miller? I'd take my chances with those guys over Roy & Aldridge.

Andre Miller was 2-5 on 3 pointers last night? Wow. I'm not sure if I'm more surprised that he shot 5 or than he made 2. I'm sure any team we play would be happy to see Andre shoot 5 3's.
 
Nothing at all to do with Oden, who played most of last year.

Miller's presence/Sergio's absence, and Webster's presence/Travis and Nic's absence are the issues.
 
I actually would like to know what people expect to happen, because right now if you look at the team, those two guys have to put up near 60 for the team to even have a chance to win. Look around the team and what other guys are averaging. In order for the Blazers to have a chance most nights the facts are Lamarcus and Broy are going to have to put up near 60 to just keep us in the game.

When Oden went down I fully expected their scoring to go up.

Now the question is, can you live with the lack of defense, the lack of rebounding, the lack of points in the paint. (Outscored by Indiana in the paint last night, and Indiana is 3rd to last in the league in points in the paint.)

This was only one game against one of the worst teams in the league without their main go to guy. Try not to ge too giddy.
 
If the Blazers offense is better without Oden, then the Blazers need a new offense. And a new coach.

Roy and LaMarcus don't know how to play with a dominant center like Greg? Neither does Nate. Miller does though.

And of course their stats are up -- it's now a two man team.

It does appear Joel has been pouting along with them. That surprises me.

Greg Oden makes this team significantly better. That is evident from simply watching the games. Greg could help make Roy and Aldridge better too, if they were willing for it to happen.

Have fun with your personal glory and more money than god, guys.

:sigh:
 
Last edited:
If the Blazers offense is better without Oden, then the Blazers need a new offense. And a new coach.

Roy and LaMarcus don't know how to play with a dominant center like Greg? Neither does Nate. Miller does though.

And of course their stats are up -- it's now a two man team.

Greg Oden makes this team significantly better. That is evident from simply watching the games. Greg could help make Roy and Aldridge better too, if they were willing for it to happen.

Have fun with your personal glory and more money than god, guys.

:sigh:

Since when has Miller ever played with a dominant big man?
 
Would people please stop with the incessant strawman posts? It's obvious that Roy and LMA are going to have to do the heavy lifting with the roster that we now have. Their stats are going to go up. Yeah, they're probably more comfortable with this type of offense just because they're familiar with it. That doesn't mean that they prefer this situation or that they can't play with Oden. Do you really think that they don't know that their chances of winning a title got a lot smaller when Greg was injured? Didn't you see the looks on their faces when he went down?

No Blazer players or fans like what's happened with all of the major injuries. Why does it seem that the way some people around here have of dealing with adversity is to try to kick the rest of our players in the groin?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top